Remember Me
Or use your Academic/Social account:


Or use your Academic/Social account:


You have just completed your registration at OpenAire.

Before you can login to the site, you will need to activate your account. An e-mail will be sent to you with the proper instructions.


Please note that this site is currently undergoing Beta testing.
Any new content you create is not guaranteed to be present to the final version of the site upon release.

Thank you for your patience,
OpenAire Dev Team.

Close This Message


Verify Password:
Verify E-mail:
*All Fields Are Required.
Please Verify You Are Human:
fbtwitterlinkedinvimeoflicker grey 14rssslideshare1
Karlsson, Paula Sonja; Valkama, Pekka; Asenova, Darinka (2015)
Languages: English
Types: Article
This research presents a cross-national comparative review of the institutional arrangements for how local public service partnerships are regulated and governed in Finland and Scotland.Both legal and administrative differences of partnership policies are analysed in order to explain the nature of the incentives and obligations for local governments to collaborate with external partners. Institutional theory and conceptual partnership approaches are utilised in the analysis. The Scottish institutional framework provides defined requirements for public-private partnerships. The partnership term is not recognised in the Finnish legal framework;instead it operates with the general concept of co-operation. Both Scottish and Finnish municipalities have more institutional obligations than incentives for partnerships or collaboration. The Scottish institutional framework requires municipalities to partner with external organisations, while in Finland, the legislature has not been proactive in promoting or encouraging public-private partnership. While the political incentives for partnerships are stronger in Scotland, Scottish municipalities have limited financial incentives to look for budgetary savings from partnership arrangements. In contrast, in Finland such financial incentives exist. However, the fixed forms of municipal-municipal collaboration may inhibit the search for more effective forms of partnerships.
  • The results below are discovered through our pilot algorithms. Let us know how we are doing!

    • Andersson, Kjell & Sjöblom, Stefan (2013). Localism in Finland: The changing role and current crisis of the Finnish municipal system. Local Economy, Vol.
    • (2011). The Local Government System in Finland.
    • Programme, 10.1.2011.
    • Association of Finnish Local and Regional Authorities & The Church Council (2002). Kunta ja seurakunta - yhteistyössä yhteisön hyväksi. http://shop.kunnat.
    • Building Safer Communities (2014). Total Place: Examples of Total Place based approaches in Scotland. http://www.buildingsafercommunities.
    • Choi, Cheon G. & Choi, Sang O. (2012). Collaborative City Council (2015) The Edinburgh Partnership Community Plan 2015/18. http://www.
    • n h s l o t h i a n . s c o t . n h s . u k / O u r O rg a n i s a t i o n / B o a r d C o m m i t t e e s / L o t h i a n N H S B o a r d / Ministry of Finance (2015). Kuntauudistus. http:// Sandford, Mark (2014). Local authorities: the General Power of Competence. SN/PC/05687. Parliament & Constitution Centre.
    • Scotland Office (2015). 5 things you might not know about Scotland's new powers. https://www.gov.uk/ Ministry of Social Affairs and Health (2015). Sotehttp://www.stm.fi/vireilla/ke hittamisNelson, Jane & Zadek, Simon (2000). Partnership alchemy: New Social Partnerships in Europe.
    • Oulasvirta, Lasse & Turala, Maciej (2009). Financial autonomy and consistency of central government policy towards local governments. International Review of Administrative Sciences, Vol. 75(2), pp.
    • Sullivan, Helen & Skelcher, Chris (2002). Working Tynkkynen, Liina-Kaisa, Lehto, Juhani & Miettinen, The Scottish Government (2006). Scotland's Children - The Children (Scotland) Act 1995 Regulations and Guidance: Volume 1 Support and Protection for Children and Their Families. http://www.gov.
    • The Scottish Government (2011). Building a Government in Scotland. http://www.scotland.gov.
    • The Scottish Government (2015a). Integration of Health and Social Care. http://www.gov.scot/ Topics/Health/Policy/Adult-Health-SocialCareThe Scottish Government (2015b). Treatment and Support Services. http://www.gov.scot/Topics/ Health/Services/Alcohol/treatment.
    • Government (2015c). Community Planning in Scotland. http://www.gov.scot/Topics/ Government/PublicServiceReform/CP.
    • Tynkkynen, Liina-Kaisa & Lehto, Juhani (2009). An analysis of ophthalmology services in Finland - has the time come for a Public-Private Partnership? Health Research Policy and Systems, Vol. 7(24).
    • Sari (2012). Framing the decision to contract out elderly care and primary health care services - perspectives of local level politicians and civil Research, Vol. 12(201).
    • Tynkkynen, Liina-Kaisa, Fredriksson, Sami & Lehto, Juhani (2013). Perspectives on Purchaser-Provider Co-Operation in the Local Welfare Regimes in Finland. International Journal of Public and Private Healthcare Management and Economics, Vol. 3(1), pp. 17-32.
    • Valkama, Pekka, Asenova, Darinka & Bailey, Stephen J. (2016) Risk management challenges of shared public services: a comparative analysis of Scotland and Finland. Public Money & Management, Vol.
    • 36(1), pp. 31-38.
    • Valkama, Pekka, Oulasvirta, Lasse, Karlsson, Paula Darinka (2015). Julkisen ja maankäyttöprosessin näkökulmasta. Finnish Urban Studies Days 2015, University of Tampere, pp.
    • Willis, Martin & Jeffares, Stephen (2012). Four Viewpoints of Whole Area Public Partnerships.
    • Local Government Studies, Vol. 38(5), pp. 539- Vangen, Siv (1998). Transferring Doctoral thesis.
  • No related research data.
  • No similar publications.

Share - Bookmark

Download from

Cite this article