Remember Me
Or use your Academic/Social account:


Or use your Academic/Social account:


You have just completed your registration at OpenAire.

Before you can login to the site, you will need to activate your account. An e-mail will be sent to you with the proper instructions.


Please note that this site is currently undergoing Beta testing.
Any new content you create is not guaranteed to be present to the final version of the site upon release.

Thank you for your patience,
OpenAire Dev Team.

Close This Message


Verify Password:
Verify E-mail:
*All Fields Are Required.
Please Verify You Are Human:
fbtwitterlinkedinvimeoflicker grey 14rssslideshare1
Scholte, Jan Aart (2007)
Publisher: University of Warwick. Centre for the Study of Globalisation and Regionalisation
Languages: English
Types: Book
Subjects: JZ
Along with the general intensified globalisation of social relations in contemporary history has come an unprecedented expansion of regulatory apparatuses that cover planetary jurisdictions and constituencies. On the whole, however, this global governance remains weak relative to pressing current needs for global public policy. Shortfalls in moral standing, legal foundations, material delivery, democratic credentials and charismatic leadership have together generated large legitimacy deficits in existing global regimes. This fragile overall legitimacy has in turn constituted a major obstacle to achieving the substantial further growth of global-scale regulation that is required to secure decent human lives for all in a more global world. Insufficient capacities for global governance and insufficient legitimacy of global governance are thus coupled in damaging mutual reinforcement.\ud \ud This paper argues that – although there are of course considerable variations across different global governance institutions and different civil society initiatives – the general picture has been one of but partially realised potentials of legitimacy promotion. Like the tip of the proverbial iceberg, civil society activities concerning global regulation have so far made visible only a fraction of the total mass of possibilities. Hence prescriptions for the future centre on ‘more’ and ‘better’. Regarding more quantity, urgently required greater positive legitimation of global governance can be promoted with more civil society engagement, covering more regulatory institutions and extending through more stages of the policy process. Regarding better quality, to have greater positive legitimation effects civil society relations with global governance generally need to be more inclusive, more competent, more coordinated, and more accountable. Both sides to the interchange – civil society associations on the one hand and global regulatory bodies on the other – can take a range of measures to further these ends.
  • The results below are discovered through our pilot algorithms. Let us know how we are doing!

    • Ahrne, G. (1998) 'Civil Society and Uncivil Organizations', in J.C. Alexander (ed.), Real Civil Societies: Dilemmas of Institutionalization. London: Sage.
    • Batliwala, S. and L.D. Brown (eds) (2006) Transnational Civil Society: An Introduction. Bloomfield, CT: Kumarian Press.
    • Bello, W. (2002) De-Globalization: Ideas for a New World Economy. London: Zed.
    • Blagescu, M. and R. Lloyd (2006) 2006 Global Accountability Report: Holding Power to Account. London: One World Trust.
    • Brown, L.D. et al. (2001) Practice-Research Engagement and Civil Society in a Globalizing World. Cambridge, MA: Hauser Centre for Nonprofit Organizations, Harvard University.
    • Buchanan, A. and R.O. Keohane (2006) 'The Legitimacy of Global Governance Institutions', Ethics and International Affairs, vol. 20, no. 4, pp. 405-38.
    • Bull, B. and D. McNeill (2007) Development Issues in Global Governance: Market Multilateralism and Private-Public Partnerships. London: Routledge.
    • Cardoso, F.H. et al. (2004) We The Peoples: Civil Society, the United Nations and Global Governance. Report of the Panel of Eminent Persons on United Nations-Civil Society Relations. New York: United Nations General Assembly Document A/58/817.
    • Chapman, J. and A. Wameyo (2001) Monitoring and Evaluating Advocacy: A Scoping Study. London: ActionAid.
    • Clark, J.D. (ed.) (2003) Globalizing Civic Engagement: Civil Society and Transnational Action. London: Earthscan.
    • Cohen, J.L. and A. Arato (1992) Civil Society and Political Theory. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
    • CSGR (2007) Centre for the Study of Globalisation and Regionalisation, Globalisation Index, at www.csgr.org, accessed on 9 January.
    • Cutler, A.C. et al. (eds) (1999) Private Authority in International Affairs. Albany, NY: State University of New York Press.
    • Della Porta, D. et al. (2006) Globalization from Below: Transnational Activists and Protest Networks. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
    • Ebrahim, A. and E. Weisband (eds) (2007) Global Accountabilities. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    • Edwards, M. (2000) NGO Rights and Responsibilities: A New Deal for Global Governance. London: Foreign Policy Centre.
    • Edwards, M. (2004) Civil Society. Cambridge: Polity.
    • Edwards, M. and J. Gaventa (eds) (2001) Global Citizen Action. Boulder, CO: Rienner.
    • Eschle, C. and B. Maiguascha (eds) (2005) Critical Theories, International Relations and 'The Anti-Globalisation Movement': The Politics of Global Resistance. London: Routledge.
    • FIM (2007) Website of the Montreal International Forum, www.fimcivilsociety.org, accessed on 17 March.
  • No related research data.
  • No similar publications.

Share - Bookmark

Cite this article