Remember Me
Or use your Academic/Social account:


Or use your Academic/Social account:


You have just completed your registration at OpenAire.

Before you can login to the site, you will need to activate your account. An e-mail will be sent to you with the proper instructions.


Please note that this site is currently undergoing Beta testing.
Any new content you create is not guaranteed to be present to the final version of the site upon release.

Thank you for your patience,
OpenAire Dev Team.

Close This Message


Verify Password:
Verify E-mail:
*All Fields Are Required.
Please Verify You Are Human:
fbtwitterlinkedinvimeoflicker grey 14rssslideshare1
Gitzel, Ralf; Turrin, Simone; Maczey, Sylvia; Wu, Shaomin; Schmitz, Björn (2016)
Languages: English
Types: Unknown
Subjects: HA33
In this paper, we describe an approach to understanding data quality issues in field data used for the calculation of reliability metrics such as availability, reliability over time, or MTBF. The focus lies on data from sources such as maintenance management systems or warranty databases which contain information on failure times, failure modes for all units. We propose a hierarchy of data quality metrics which identify and assess key problems in the input data. The metrics are organized in such a way that they guide the data analyst to those problems with the most impact on the calculation and provide a prioritised action plan for the improvement of data quality. The metrics cover issues such as missing, wrong, implausible and inaccurate data. We use examples with real-world data to showcase our software prototype and to illustrate how the metrics have helped with data preparation. Using this way, analysts can reduce the amount of wrong conclusions drawn from the data to mistakes in the input values.
  • The results below are discovered through our pilot algorithms. Let us know how we are doing!

    • Gitzel, R. (2014) Industrial Services Analytics. Presentation at the 1. GOR Analytics Tagung, Munich, 11.4.2014
    • Gitzel, R., Turring, S., Maczey, S. (2015, July). A Data Quality Dashboard for Reliability Data. In 2015 IEEE 17th Conference on Business Informatics (CBI), Vol. 1, pp. 90-97.
    • Kahn, BK.; Strong, Diane M.; Wang, Richard Y. (2002): Information quality benchmarks: product and service performance. Communications of the ACM 45 (4), pp. 184 192
    • Ballou, D.P., Pazer, H.L. (1985): Modeling data and process quality in multi-input, multi-output information systems. Management Science 31, 2, (1985), 150 162.
    • Borek, A.; Parlikad, AK.; Webb, J.; Woodall, P. (2014): Total information risk management maximizing the value of data and information assets. Morgan Kaufmann
    • Benson, P. (2008): ISO 8000 the International Standard for Data Quality, in MIT Information Quality Symposium, July 16-17, 2008
    • Ban, X., Ning, S., Xu, X.; Cheng, P. (2008): Novel method for the evaluation of data quality based on fuzzy control. Journal of Systems Engineering and Electronics, 19 (3), 606 610.
    • IEEE (2007): IEEE Standard 493 - IEEE Recommended Practice for the Design of Reliable Industrial and Commercial Power Systems.
    • Vadlamani, R. (2007): Modified Great Deluge Algorithm versus Other Metaheuristics in Reliability Optimization, Computational Intelligence in Reliability Engineering, Studies in Computational Intelligence 40, 2007, 21-36
    • Bendell, T. (1988): An overview of collection, analysis, and application of reliability data in the process industries. IEEE Transactions on Reliability 37(2), 132 137.
    • Montgomery, N.; Hodkiewicz, M. (2014): Data Fitness for Purpose. In: Proceedings of the MIMAR 2014 Conference, Oxford, UK.
    • Wu, S. (2013): A review on coarse warranty data and analysis, Reliability Engineering & System Safety, 114, 1-11
    • Alam, M.M.; Suzuki, K. (2009): Lifetime Estimation Using Only Failure Information From Warranty Database, IEEE Transactions on Reliability, 58(4), 573--582
  • No related research data.
  • No similar publications.

Share - Bookmark

Download from

Cite this article