Remember Me
Or use your Academic/Social account:


Or use your Academic/Social account:


You have just completed your registration at OpenAire.

Before you can login to the site, you will need to activate your account. An e-mail will be sent to you with the proper instructions.


Please note that this site is currently undergoing Beta testing.
Any new content you create is not guaranteed to be present to the final version of the site upon release.

Thank you for your patience,
OpenAire Dev Team.

Close This Message


Verify Password:
Verify E-mail:
*All Fields Are Required.
Please Verify You Are Human:
fbtwitterlinkedinvimeoflicker grey 14rssslideshare1
Woodcock, Pete (2008)
Publisher: University of Huddersfield
Languages: English
Types: Part of book or chapter of book
Subjects: BF
Due to its longevity (almost 400 episodes and 18 years), and the sheer number of\ud supporting characters that appear on it, the writers and producers of The Simpsons\ud has created a model of society which can be exploited by the political theorist. This\ud paper aims to explore the social and political ramifications of this model of, especially\ud the accusation that the programme in inherently conservative in its portrayal of\ud gender and the nuclear family.\ud \ud \ud This paper will also look at the depiction of politicians in the programme (for example\ud fictional politicians such as Mayor ‘Diamond’ Joe Quimby and Sideshow Bob as well\ud as real politicians Bill Clinton and George Bush snr), and suggest that whereas The\ud Simpsons may appear to mock all politicians, this is not in fact the case, and that The\ud Simpsons does provide us with examples of the types of qualities that are admirable\ud in a politician. It will be argued that the writers of The Simpsons only mock two types\ud of politicians; actual living politicians (it is from this fact that it gets its reputation for\ud being impartial), and dishonest metropolitan-type politicians. Local, hard working\ud politicians (most notably Governor Mary Bailey and former Sanitation Commissioner\ud Ray Patterson) are exempt from their criticism, suggesting that they prefer local\ud substance over glitz and style.
  • The results below are discovered through our pilot algorithms. Let us know how we are doing!

    • Cantor, Paul A. (1999) 'The Simpsons: Atomistic Politics and the Nuclear Family', Political Theory, Vol. 27, No. 6 (December, 1999), pp.734-749.
    • Gimple, Scott M. (ed.) (1999) The Simpsons Forever! A Complete Guide to Our Family…Continued, London, Harper Collins.
    • Goldberg, Jonah (2000) 'Homer Never Nods', National Review, http://www.nationalreview.com/01may00/goldberg050100.html, accessed 16/10/2006.
    • McCann, Jesse L. (ed.) (2002) The Simpsons Beyond Forever! A Complete Guide to Our Favorite Family…Still Continued, London, Harper Collins.
    • McCann, Jesse L. (ed.) (2005) The Simpsons One Step Beyond Forever! A Complete Guide to Our Favorite Family…Continued Yet Again, London, Harper Collins.
    • McCormick Tribune Freedom Museum (2006) Americans' Awareness of First Amendment Freedoms, http://www.rrmtf.org/mtf/pressroom/2006/Survey_ Results_Report.pdf, accessed Friday, 16 February 2007.
    • Richmond, Ray and Coffman, Antonia (eds.) (1997) The Simpsons: A Complete Guide to Our Family, London, Harper Collins.
    • Singh, Robert (2002) 'Subverting American Values? The Simpsons, South Park and the Cartoon Culture War' in Robert Singh (2002), American Politics and Society Today, Cambridge, Polity, pp.206-229.
    • Snow, Dale E. and Snow, James J. (2001) 'Simpsonian Sexual Politics', in William Irwin, Mark T. Conard and Aeon J. Skoble (2001) The Simpsons and Philosophy: The D'oh! Of Homer, Chicago and La Salle, Illinois, Open Court, pp.126-144.
    • Woodcock, Pete (2006) 'The Polis of Springfield: The Simpsons and the Teaching of Political Theory' in Politics, Vol. 26, No. 3, pp.192-199.
  • No related research data.
  • No similar publications.

Share - Bookmark

Cite this article