Remember Me
Or use your Academic/Social account:


Or use your Academic/Social account:


You have just completed your registration at OpenAire.

Before you can login to the site, you will need to activate your account. An e-mail will be sent to you with the proper instructions.


Please note that this site is currently undergoing Beta testing.
Any new content you create is not guaranteed to be present to the final version of the site upon release.

Thank you for your patience,
OpenAire Dev Team.

Close This Message


Verify Password:
Verify E-mail:
*All Fields Are Required.
Please Verify You Are Human:
fbtwitterlinkedinvimeoflicker grey 14rssslideshare1
Bligh, CA (2015)
Publisher: Taylor & Francis
Languages: English
Types: Article
This paper draws together the research findings from two ethnographic studies (Drury, 2007; Bligh, 2011) as a means to problematize the ‘silent period’ as experienced by young bilingual learners in two English speaking early years settings in England. Most teachers and senior early years practitioners in England are monolingual English speakers. The children (regardless of their mother tongue) are taught through the medium of spoken and written English in and through all subject areas. Bilingual learning through the mother tongue is not only disregarded in most schools in England but is actively discouraged in some.\ud \ud Three emergent bilingual learners were re-examined as case studies. Suki and Adyta (Bligh, 2011) of Japanese and Punjabi decent and Nazma (Drury, 2007) of Kashmiri descent were observed whilst they each negotiated new ways of knowing within and through an English pre-school setting. Sociocultural insights into how these young children employ their silenced mother tongue to negotiate their learning creates a fuller and richer portrait of the emergent bilingual learner both in and outside of preschool.\ud \ud These collaborative research findings present the silent period as agentive (Drury, 2007) and as a crucial time for self-mediated learning (Bligh, 2011) within the early years community of practice.
  • The results below are discovered through our pilot algorithms. Let us know how we are doing!

    • Bligh, C. (2011b) Early Years and Children's Rights. Cited in: Jones, P. and Walker, G.
    • Babbie, E. (2009) The practice of social research, 12th ed. California: Wadsworth.
    • Braun, V. and Clarke, V. (2006) Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3, pp.77-101.
    • British Council (2005) Teaching English: Non-verbal communication. London: BBC.
    • Available from: www.teachingenglish.org.uk/.../non-verbal-communication. [Accessed on 12 November 2008]
    • Clarke, P. (1997) Principles of second language learning. Unpublished paper, FKA Multicultural Resource Centre, Melbourne, Victoria.
    • Dasgupta, P. (1993) The Otherness of English: India's Auntie Tongue Syndrome. New Dehli: Sage.
    • Department for Education (DfE) (2012a) Statutory Framework for the Early Years Foundation Stage (2012) Department for Education (DFE-00023-2012) Available from: https://www.education.gov.uk/publications/standard/AllPublications/Page1/ [Accessed on 10 December 2012].
    • Trochim, W. (2006) Descriptive statistics Available from: http://www.socialresearchmethods.net/kb/statdesc.php [accessed April 23, 2013].
    • Vygotsky, L. (1986) Thought and Language. In: Kozulin, A. (Translated and Edited) Thought and language. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
    • Vytgotsky, L. (1978) Mind in Society: the development of higher psychological processes.
    • Wenger, E. (1998) Communities of Practice: Learning, Meaning and Identity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • No related research data.
  • No similar publications.

Share - Bookmark

Download from

Cite this article