LOGIN TO YOUR ACCOUNT

Username
Password
Remember Me
Or use your Academic/Social account:

CREATE AN ACCOUNT

Or use your Academic/Social account:

Congratulations!

You have just completed your registration at OpenAire.

Before you can login to the site, you will need to activate your account. An e-mail will be sent to you with the proper instructions.

Important!

Please note that this site is currently undergoing Beta testing.
Any new content you create is not guaranteed to be present to the final version of the site upon release.

Thank you for your patience,
OpenAire Dev Team.

Close This Message

CREATE AN ACCOUNT

Name:
Username:
Password:
Verify Password:
E-mail:
Verify E-mail:
*All Fields Are Required.
Please Verify You Are Human:
fbtwitterlinkedinvimeoflicker grey 14rssslideshare1
Sinnicks, Matthew (2014)
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Languages: English
Types: Article
Subjects: N100, N200, V500
This paper argues that attempts to apply Alasdair MacIntyre’s positive moral theory to business ethics are problematic, due to the cognitive closure of MacIntyre’s concept of a practice. I begin by outlining the notion of a practice, before turning to Moore’s attempt to provide a MacIntyrean account of corporate governance. I argue that Moore’s attempt is mismatched with MacIntyre’s account of moral education. Because the notion of practices resists general application I go on to argue that a negative application, which focuses on regulation, is more plausible. Large-scale regulation, usually thought antithetical to MacIntyre’s advocacy of small-scale politics, has the potential to facilitate practice-based work and reveals that MacIntyre’s own work can be used against his pessimism about the modern order. Furthermore, the conception of regulation I defend can show us how management is more amenable to ethical understanding than MacIntyre’s work is often taken to imply.
  • The results below are discovered through our pilot algorithms. Let us know how we are doing!

    • Aristotle. 1999. Nicomachean Ethics, Indianapolis: Hackett.
    • ________. 2008. “How Aristotelian Can Become Revolutionary: Ethics, Resistance, Utopia', Philosophy of Management, 7: 3-7.
    • ________. 2010. 'Two Kinds of Political Reasoning', lecture presented at London Metropolitan University.
    • ________. 2011. “Where We Were, Where We Are, Where We Need To Be” in P.
    • Blackledge and K. Knight, 2011, 307-334.
    • Mintzberg, H. 2009. Managing, San Francisco: Berrett-Koehler.
    • Moore, G. 2002. “On the Implications of the Practice-Institution Distinction: MacIntyre and the Application of Modern Virtue Ethics to Business”, Business Ethics Quarterly, 12(1): 19-32.
    • ________. 2005a. “Humanizing Business: A Modern Virtue Ethics Approach”, Business Ethics Quarterly, 15(2): 659-685.
    • ________. 2005b. “Corporate Character: Modern Virtue Ethics and the Corporation”, Business Ethics Quarterly, 15(4): 237-255.
    • ________. 2012. “The Virtue of Governance, the Governance of Virtue”, Business Ethics Quarterly, 22(2): 293-318.
    • Whetstone, T. 2003. “The Language of Managerial Excellence: Virtues as Understood and Applied”, Journal of Business Ethics 44: 343-57.
  • No related research data.
  • Discovered through pilot similarity algorithms. Send us your feedback.

Share - Bookmark

Cite this article