Remember Me
Or use your Academic/Social account:


Or use your Academic/Social account:


You have just completed your registration at OpenAire.

Before you can login to the site, you will need to activate your account. An e-mail will be sent to you with the proper instructions.


Please note that this site is currently undergoing Beta testing.
Any new content you create is not guaranteed to be present to the final version of the site upon release.

Thank you for your patience,
OpenAire Dev Team.

Close This Message


Verify Password:
Verify E-mail:
*All Fields Are Required.
Please Verify You Are Human:
fbtwitterlinkedinvimeoflicker grey 14rssslideshare1
Spence, Alexa; Townsend, Ellen (2006)
Publisher: Blackwell-Synergy
Languages: English
Types: Article
This study examined behaviour towards genetically modified (GM) food in a British community-based sample. We used an equivalent gain task in which participants actually received the options they chose to encourage truthful responding. In conjunction with this, theory of planned behaviour (TPB) components were evaluated so as to examine the relative importance of behavioural influences in this domain. Here the TPB was extended to include additional components to measure self-identity, moral norms and emotional involvement. Results indicated that the monetary amounts participants accepted in preference to GM food were significantly lower than those accepted in preference to non-GM food. However, the vast majority of participants were indifferent between GM and non-GM food options. All TPB components significantly predicted behavioural intentions to try GM food, with attitudes towards GM being the strongest predictor. Self-identity and emotional involvement were also found to be significant predictors of behavioural intentions but moral norms were not. In addition, behavioural intentions significantly predicted behaviour, however, PBC did not. An additional measure of participants’ propensity to respond in a socially desirable manner indicated that our results were not influenced by self presentation issues giving confidence to our findings. Overall, it appears that the majority of participants (74.5%) would purchase GM food at some price.
  • The results below are discovered through our pilot algorithms. Let us know how we are doing!

    • Haahr, M. (2000). True Random Number Service. www.Random.org [13th October 2005].
    • Lahteenmaki, L., Grunert, K., Ueland, O., Astrom, A., Arvola, A. and Bech-Larson, T. (2002). Food Quality and Preference. 13: 523-533.
    • Magnusson, M. K. and Hursti, U. K. (2002). Consumer attitudes towards genetically modified foods. Appetite. 39, 9-24.
  • No related research data.
  • No similar publications.

Share - Bookmark

Cite this article