Remember Me
Or use your Academic/Social account:


Or use your Academic/Social account:


You have just completed your registration at OpenAire.

Before you can login to the site, you will need to activate your account. An e-mail will be sent to you with the proper instructions.


Please note that this site is currently undergoing Beta testing.
Any new content you create is not guaranteed to be present to the final version of the site upon release.

Thank you for your patience,
OpenAire Dev Team.

Close This Message


Verify Password:
Verify E-mail:
*All Fields Are Required.
Please Verify You Are Human:
fbtwitterlinkedinvimeoflicker grey 14rssslideshare1
El-Howayek, G.; Zhang, C.; Li, Y.; Ng, J.S.; David, J.P.R.; Hayat, M.M. (2014)
Publisher: IEEE
Languages: English
Types: Article
The analytical calculation of the bit error rate (BER) of digital optical receivers that employ avalanche photodiodes (APDs) is challenging due to 1) the stochastic nature of the avalanche photodiode's impulse-response function and 2) the presence of intersymbol interference (ISI). At ultrafast transmission rates, ISI becomes a dominant component of the BER, and its effect on the BER should be carefully addressed. One solution to this problem, termed the bit-pattern-dependent (PD) approach, is to first calculate the conditional BER given a specific bit pattern and then average over all possible bit patterns. Alternatively, a simplifying method, termed the bit-pattern-independent (PI) approach, has been commonly used whereby the average bit stream is used to calculate the distribution of the receiver output, which, in turn, is used to calculate the BER. However, when ISI is dominant, the PI approximation is inaccurate. Here, the two approaches are analytically compared by analyzing their asymptotic behavior and their bounds. Conditions are found to determine when the PI method overestimates the BER. The BER found using the PD method exponentially decays with the received optical power, whereas for the PI approach, the BER converges to a constant, which is unrealistic. For an InP-based APD receiver with a 100-nm multiplication layer, the PI method is found to be inaccurate for transmission rates beyond 20 Gb/s.
  • The results below are discovered through our pilot algorithms. Let us know how we are doing!

    • [1] G. P. Agrawal, Fiber-Optic Communication Systems, 3rd ed. New York, NY, USA: Wiley, 2002.
    • [2] Y. Kang, H.-D. Liu, M. Morse, M. J. Paniccia, M. Zadka, S. Litski, G. Sarid, A. Pauchard, Y.-H. Kuo, H.-W. Chen, W. S. Zaoui, J. E. Bowers, A. Beling, D. C. McIntosh, X. Zheng, and J. C. Campbell, BMonolithic germanium/silicon avalanche photodiodes with 340 GHz gain-bandwidth product,[ Nature Photon., vol. 3, pp. 59-63, Jan. 2009.
    • [3] M. M. Hayat and D. A. Ramirez, BMultiplication theory for dynamically biased avalanche photodiodes: New limits for gain bandwidth product,[ Opt. Exp., vol. 20, no. 7, pp. 8024-8040, Mar. 2012.
    • [4] G. El-Howayek and M. M. Hayat, BMethod for performance analysis and optimization of APD optical receivers operating under dynamic reverse bias,[ in Proc. IEEE IPC, Bellevue, WA, USA, Sep. 2013, pp. 362-363.
    • [5] F. Davidson and X. Sun, BGaussian approximation versus nearly exact performance analysis of optical communication systems with PPM signaling and APD receivers,[ IEEE Trans. Commun., vol. 36, no. 11, pp. 1185-1192, Nov. 1988.
    • [6] P. Sun, M. M. Hayat, and A. K. Das, BBit error rates for ultrafast APD based optical receivers: Exact and large deviation based asymptotic approaches,[ IEEE Trans. Commun., vol. 57, no. 9, pp. 2763-2770, Sep. 2009.
    • [7] D. S. G. Ong, J. S. Ng, M. M. Hayat, P. Sun, and J. P. R. David, BOptimization of InP APDs for high-speed lightwave systems,[ J. Lightw. Technol., vol. 27, no. 15, pp. 3294-3302, Aug. 2009.
    • [8] D. S. G. Ong, M. M. Hayat, J. P. R. David, and J. S. Ng, BSensitivity of high-speed lightwave system receivers using InAlAs avalanche photodiodes,[ IEEE Photon. Technol. Lett., vol. 23, no. 4, pp. 233-235, Feb. 2011.
    • [9] A. Papoulis, BHigh density shot noise and Gaussianity,[ J. Appl. Probability, vol. 8, no. 1, pp. 118-127, Mar. 1971.
    • [10] S. D. Personick, P. Balaban, J. Bobsin, and P. Kumar, BA detailed comparison of four approaches to the calculation of the sensitivity of optical fiber system receivers,[ IEEE Trans. Commun., vol. 25, no. 5, pp. 541-548, May 1977.
    • [11] P. Sun, M. M. Hayat, B. E. A. Saleh, and M. C. Teich, BStatistical correlation of gain and buildup time in APDs and its effects on receiver performance,[ J. Lightw. Technol., vol. 24, no. 2, pp. 755-768, Feb. 2006.
    • [12] J. B. Abshire, BPerformance of OOK and low-order PPM modulations in optical communications when using APDbased receivers,[ IEEE Trans. Commun., vol. 32, no. 10, pp. 1140-1143, Oct. 1984.
    • [13] H. M. H. Shalaby, BEffect of thermal noise and APD noise on the performance of OPPM-CDMA receivers,[ J. Lightw. Technol., vol. 18, no. 7, pp. 905-914, Jul. 2000.
    • [14] L. C. Andrews, Special Functions of Mathematics for Engineers, 2nd ed., Bellingham, WA, USA: SPIE, 1992.
  • No related research data.
  • No similar publications.

Share - Bookmark

Funded by projects

  • NSF | Collaborative Research: Imp...

Cite this article