Remember Me
Or use your Academic/Social account:


Or use your Academic/Social account:


You have just completed your registration at OpenAire.

Before you can login to the site, you will need to activate your account. An e-mail will be sent to you with the proper instructions.


Please note that this site is currently undergoing Beta testing.
Any new content you create is not guaranteed to be present to the final version of the site upon release.

Thank you for your patience,
OpenAire Dev Team.

Close This Message


Verify Password:
Verify E-mail:
*All Fields Are Required.
Please Verify You Are Human:
fbtwitterlinkedinvimeoflicker grey 14rssslideshare1
Bhaskaran, Krishnan; Hajat, Shakoor; Haines, Andy; Herrett, Emily; Wilkinson, Paul; Smeeth, Liam (2010)
Publisher: BMJ Publishing Group Ltd.
Journal: The BMJ
Languages: English
Types: Article
Subjects: Drugs: Cardiovascular System, Epidemiologic Studies, Ischaemic Heart Disease, Research
OBJECTIVE: To examine the short term relation between ambient temperature and risk of myocardial infarction. DESIGN: Daily time series regression analysis. SETTING: 15 conurbations in England and Wales. PARTICIPANTS: 84 010 hospital admissions for myocardial infarction recorded in the Myocardial Ischaemia National Audit Project during 2003-6 (median 57 events a day). MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Change in risk of myocardial infarction associated with a 1 degrees C difference in temperature, including effects delayed by up to 28 days. RESULTS: Smoothed graphs revealed a broadly linear relation between temperature and myocardial infarction, which was well characterised by log-linear models without a temperature threshold: each 1 degrees C reduction in daily mean temperature was associated with a 2.0% (95% confidence interval 1.1% to 2.9%) cumulative increase in risk of myocardial infarction over the current and following 28 days, the strongest effects being estimated at intermediate lags of 2-7 and 8-14 days: increase per 1 degrees C reduction 0.6% (95% confidence interval 0.2% to 1.1%) and 0.7% (0.3% to 1.1%), respectively. Heat had no detrimental effect. Adults aged 75-84 and those with previous coronary heart disease seemed more vulnerable to the effects of cold than other age groups (P for interaction 0.001 or less in each case), whereas those taking aspirin were less vulnerable (P for interaction 0.007). CONCLUSIONS: Increases in risk of myocardial infarction at colder ambient temperatures may be one driver of cold related increases in overall mortality, but an increased risk of myocardial infarction at higher temperatures was not detected. The risk of myocardial infarction in vulnerable people might be reduced by the provision of targeted advice or other interventions, triggered by forecasts of lower temperature.

Share - Bookmark

Funded by projects

Cite this article