Remember Me
Or use your Academic/Social account:


You have just completed your registration at OpenAire.

Before you can login to the site, you will need to activate your account. An e-mail will be sent to you with the proper instructions.


Please note that this site is currently undergoing Beta testing.
Any new content you create is not guaranteed to be present to the final version of the site upon release.

Thank you for your patience,
OpenAire Dev Team.

Close This Message


Verify Password:
Verify E-mail:
*All Fields Are Required.
Please Verify You Are Human:

OpenAIRE is about to release its new face with lots of new content and services.
During September, you may notice downtime in services, while some functionalities (e.g. user registration, login, validation, claiming) will be temporarily disabled.
We apologize for the inconvenience, please stay tuned!
For further information please contact helpdesk[at]openaire.eu

fbtwitterlinkedinvimeoflicker grey 14rssslideshare1
Cheeseman, Keely
Languages: English
Types: Doctoral thesis

Classified by OpenAIRE into

mesheuropmc: respiratory system, respiratory tract diseases
Hand hygiene is the most important measure for reducing healthcare associated infections. Previous in-vitro testing of alcohol hand rubs AHR has not reflected conditions found in practice therefore little is known about their true efficacy. This study aimed to discover how effective AHRs are when used in local intensive therapy Units ITU against Staphylococcus aureus clinical isolates and their mode of action. The AHRs were unable to achieve significant bactericidal effect 4 log reduction against S. aureus within the time healthcare workers HCW took to rub AHR into their hands, particularly when tested against bacterial cells on the surface of excised skin. The AHRs had no residual effect and the mechanical action of hand rubbing only increased bacterial cell death by approximately 1 log. The AHRs demonstrated varying efficacies against the isolates and variation in susceptibility to the AHRs was also observed among the isolates. AHR damaged the cytoplasmic membrane, but this was not the cause of the bactericidal effect, nor a reason for the differences in susceptibility observed among the strains. The cell wall and/or outer layers of the bacterial cell were found to most likely be the main target of AHR, most likely due to protein denaturation, although this study was unable to confirm this hypothesis. Virulence gene expression, cell surface charge and cell surface hydrophobicity was not affected by exposure of bacterial cells to AHR and were not responsible for varying AHR susceptibility among the isolates. This study determined the quality of AHR application amongst HCWs in the ITU and the potential cross-contamination resulting from failure to perform hand hygiene before and after certain activities. It can be concluded from this study that AHRs are unlikely to kill all microbial flora on HCWs hands. Recommendations have been made to improve hand hygiene practices and the efficacy of AHRs used in ITUs.
  • The results below are discovered through our pilot algorithms. Let us know how we are doing!

    • Larson, E.L. (1995) APIC Guidelines for Handwashing and Hand Antisepsis in Health Care Settings. American Journal o f Infection Control. 23(4):251-269
    • Lilly, H.A., Lowbury, E J., Wilkins, M.D. & Zaggy, A. (1979) Delayed Antimicrobial Effects o f Skin Disinfection by Alcohol. Journal o f Hygiene (London). 82(3):497-500
    • Lin, B., Hollingshead, S.K., Coligan, J.E., Egan, M.L., Baker, J.R. & Pritchard, D.G. (1994) Cloning and Expression o f the Gene for Group B Streptococcal Hyaluronate Lyase. The Journal o f Biological Chemistry. 269(48):30113-30116
    • & Etienne, J. (1999) Involvement o f Panton-Valentine Leukocidin-Producing Staphylococcus aureus in Primary Skin Infections and Pneumonia. Clinical Infectious Diseases. 29(5): 1128-1132
    • Lindahl, M., Faris, A., Wadstrom, T. & Hjerten, S. (1981) A N ew Test Based on 'Salting Out' to Measure Relative Surface Hydrophobicity o f Bacterial Cells. Biochimica et Biophysica Acta. 677(3-4):471-476
    • Lindsay, D. & von Holy, A. (1999) Different Responses o f Planktonic and Attached Bacillus subtilis and Pseudomonas fluorescens to Sanitizer Treatment. Journal o f Food Protection.
    • Littlejohn, T.G., DiBerardino, D., Messerotti, L J., Spiers, S.J. & Skurray, R.A. (1991) Structure and Evolution o f a Family o f Genes Encoding Antiseptic and Disinfectant Resistance in Staphylococcus aureus. Gene. 101(l):59-66 Murray, P.R., Rosenthal, K.S., Kobayashi, G.S. & Pfaller, M.A (1998) Medical Microbiology 3rdEdition. London: Mosby
    • Naffa, R.G., Bdour, S.M., Migdadi, H.M. & Shehabi, A.A. (2006) Enterotoxicity and Genetic Variation among Clinical Staphylococcus aureus Isolates in Jordan. Journal o f M edical Microbiology. 55(2): 183-187
    • Naimi, T.S., LeDell, K.H., Como-Sabetti, K., Borchardt, S.M., Boxrud, D J ., Etienne, J., Johnson, S.K., Vandenesch, F., Fridkin, S., O 'Boyle, C., Danila, R.N. & Lynfield, R. (2003) Comparison o f Community- and Health Care-Associated Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus Infection. The Journal o f the American Medical Association.
    • Narui, K., Takano, M., Noguchi, N. & Sasatsu, M. (2007) Susceptibilities o f MethicillinResistant Staphylococcus aureus Isolates to Seven Biocides. Biological & Pharmaceutical Bulletin. 30(3):585-587
    • Winn, W.C., Koneman, E.W., Allen, S.D., Janda, W.M., Schreckenberger, P.C., Procop, G.W. & Woods, G.L. (2005) Koneman's Color Atlas and Textbook o f Diagnostic Microbiology. London: Lipincott, Williams & Wilkins
  • No related research data.
  • No similar publications.

Share - Bookmark

Cite this article

Cookies make it easier for us to provide you with our services. With the usage of our services you permit us to use cookies.
More information Ok