Remember Me
Or use your Academic/Social account:


Or use your Academic/Social account:


You have just completed your registration at OpenAire.

Before you can login to the site, you will need to activate your account. An e-mail will be sent to you with the proper instructions.


Please note that this site is currently undergoing Beta testing.
Any new content you create is not guaranteed to be present to the final version of the site upon release.

Thank you for your patience,
OpenAire Dev Team.

Close This Message


Verify Password:
Verify E-mail:
*All Fields Are Required.
Please Verify You Are Human:
fbtwitterlinkedinvimeoflicker grey 14rssslideshare1
Geric, M. (2014)
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Languages: English
Types: Article
Subjects: UOW10
As Tennyson's “little Hamlet ,” Maud (1855) posits a speaker who, like Hamlet, confronts the ignominious fate of dead remains. Maud's speaker contemplates such remains as bone, hair, shell, and he experiences his world as one composed of hard inorganic matter, such things as rocks, gems, flint, stone, coal, and gold. While Maud's imagery of “stones, and hard substances” has been read as signifying the speaker's desire “unnaturally to harden himself into insensibility” (Killham 231, 235), I argue that these substances benefit from being read in the context of Tennyson's wider understanding of geological processes. Along with highlighting these materials, the text's imagery focuses on processes of fossilisation, while Maud's characters appear to be in the grip of an insidious petrification. Despite the preoccupation with geological materials and processes, the poem has received little critical attention in these terms. Dennis R. Dean, for example, whose Tennyson and Geology (1985) is still the most rigorous study of the sources of Tennyson's knowledge of geology, does not detect a geological register in the poem, arguing that by the time Tennyson began to write Maud, he was “relatively at ease with the geological world” (Dean 21). I argue, however, that Maud reveals that Tennyson was anything but “at ease” with geology. While In Memoriam (1851) wrestles with religious doubt that is both initiated, and, to some extent, alleviated by geological theories, it finally affirms the transcendence of spirit over matter. Maud, conversely, gravitates towards the ground, concerning itself with the corporal remains of life and with the agents of change that operate on all matter. Influenced by his reading of geology, and particularly Charles Lyell's provocative writings on the embedding and fossilisation of organic material in strata in his Principles of Geology (1830–33) volume 2, Tennyson's poem probes the taphonomic processes that result in the incorporation of dead remains and even living flesh into the geological system.
  • The results below are discovered through our pilot algorithms. Let us know how we are doing!

    • Cecil Y Lang ., and Edgar F.Shannon Jr., eds. The Letters of Alfred Lord Tennyson II 1851- 1870. 3 vols. Oxford: Clarendon, 1987.
    • Deborah Lutz . “The Dead Still Among Us: Victorian Secular Relic, Hair Jewellery, and Death Culture.” Victorian Literature and Culture39.1 (2011): 127-42.
    • Charles Lyell . Elements of Geology. London: John Murray, 1838.
    • Charles Lyell . Principles of Geology.1830-33. Rpt. 1st ed. 3 vols. Chicago: U of Chicago P, 1990.
    • James Henry Mangles . Tennyson at Aldworth: the Diary of James Henry Mangles. Ed. Earl A.Knies. Athens: U of Ohio P, 1984.
    • Robert James Mann . Tennyson's 'Maud' Vindicated: An Explanatory Essay. London: Jarrold & Sons, 1856.
    • Gideon Mantell . The Wonders of Geology: Or, A Familiar Exposition of Geological Phenomena. London: Relfe and Fletcher, 1838. Vol. 1.
    • Nancy Rose Marshall . “A Dim World, Where Monsters Dwell”: The Spatial Time of the Sydenham Crystal Palace Dinosaur Park.” Victorian Studies 49. 2 (2007): 286-301.
    • Richard Owen . Geology and Inhabitants of the Ancient World. London: Crystal Palace Library and Bradbury & Evans, 1854.
    • Richard Owen . Lectures on the Comparative Anatomy and Physiology of the Vertebrate Animals. London: Longman, Brown, Green and Longmans, 1846. Vol. 2.
    • Richard Owen . The Life of Richard Owen. London: John Murray, 1894. Vol. 1
    • Jan Piggott . Palace of the People: The Crystal Palace at Sydenham 1854- 1939. London: Hurst, 2004.
    • Christopher Ricks . Tennyson. Basingstoke: McMillan, 1989.
    • Martin Rudwick . Georges Cuvier, Fossil Bones, and Geological Catastrophes. Chicago: U of Chicago P, 1997.
    • Martin Rudwick . The Meaning of Fossils: Episodes in the History of Palaeontology. Chicago: U of Chicago P, 1985.
    • Martin Rudwick . Scenes From Deep Time. Chicago: U of Chicago P, 1992.
    • Nicolaas Rupke . Richard Owen: Biology Without Darwin, a Revised Edition. 2009. Chicago: U of Chicago P, 1994.
    • Susan Shatto , ed. Tennyson's Maud: The Definitive Edition. London: Athlone, 1986.
    • Linda M Shires . “Maud, Masculinity and Poetic Identity.” Criticism: A Quarterly for Literature and the Arts 29.3 (1987): 269-90.
    • E. Warwick Slinn, The Discourse of Self in Victorian Poetry. London: Macmillan, 1991.
    • Alfred Tennyson . Tennyson's Maud: The Definitive Edition. Ed. SusanShatto. London: Athlone, 1986.
    • Charles Tennyson . Alfred Tennyson. London: Macmillan, 1949.
    • Hallam Tennyson, Alfred Lord Tennyson: A Memoir by his Son. 2 vols. London: Macmillan, 1897.
    • Hallam Tennyson , ed. Tennyson and his Friends. London: Macmillan: 1911.
    • William B Thesing . “Tennyson and the City: Historical Tremors and Hysterical Tremblings.” Tennyson Research Bulletin 3.1 (1977): 14-22.
    • Michael Timko . Carlyle and Tennyson. Iowa City: Iowa UP, 1987.
    • Michael Tomko . “Varieties of Geological Experience: Religion, Body, and Spirit in Tennyson's In Memoriam and Lyell's Principles of Geology.” Victorian Poetry 2.2 (2004): 113-33.
    • John M Ulrich . “Thomas Carlyle, Richard Owen, and the Paleontological Articulation of the Past.” Journal of Victorian Culture 11.1(2006): 30-58.
    • Jonathan Wordsworth . “'What is it, that has been done?': the Central Problem of Maud.” Essays in Criticism 24 (1974): 356-62.
    • Virginia Zimmerman . Excavating Victorians. New York: New York State UP, 2008.
  • No related research data.
  • No similar publications.

Share - Bookmark

Cite this article