LOGIN TO YOUR ACCOUNT

Username
Password
Remember Me
Or use your Academic/Social account:

CREATE AN ACCOUNT

Or use your Academic/Social account:

Congratulations!

You have just completed your registration at OpenAire.

Before you can login to the site, you will need to activate your account. An e-mail will be sent to you with the proper instructions.

Important!

Please note that this site is currently undergoing Beta testing.
Any new content you create is not guaranteed to be present to the final version of the site upon release.

Thank you for your patience,
OpenAire Dev Team.

Close This Message

CREATE AN ACCOUNT

Name:
Username:
Password:
Verify Password:
E-mail:
Verify E-mail:
*All Fields Are Required.
Please Verify You Are Human:
fbtwitterlinkedinvimeoflicker grey 14rssslideshare1
Publisher: Elsevier
Languages: English
Types: Article
Subjects:
Compensatory health beliefs (CHBs) - beliefs that an unhealthy behaviour can be compensated for by healthy behaviour - are hypothesised to be activated automatically to help people resolve conflicts between their desires (e.g. eat chocolate) and their long-term goals (e.g. dieting). The aim of the present research was to investigate diet-specific CHBs within the context of a theoretical framework, the Health Action Process Approach (HAPA), to examine the extent to which diet-specific CHBs contribute to dieting intentions and dietary intake. Seventy five dieting women were recruited in Switzerland and England and were asked to complete measures of diet-specific CHBs, risk perception, outcome expectancies, self-efficacy, intention, and behaviour. Path modelling showed that, overall, diet-specific CHBs were not related to dieting intentions (ß = .10) or behaviour (ß = .06) over and above variables specified in the HAPA. However, risk perception moderated the relationship between diet-specific CHBs and intention (ß = .26). Diet-specific CHBs positively predicted intention in women with high risk perception, but not in women with low risk perception. This positive relationship might be explained by the assumption that CHBs play different roles at different stages of the health-behaviour change process. Future studies should further examine moderators and stage-specific differences of the associations between CHBs, intention and health-behaviour change.
  • The results below are discovered through our pilot algorithms. Let us know how we are doing!

    • Aiken, L. S., & West, S. G. (1991). Multiple regression: Testing and interpreting interactions. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
    • Baumeister, R. F., & Heatherton, T. F. (1996). Self-regulation failure: An overview. Psychological Inquiry, 7(1), 1-15. doi:10.1207/s15327965pli0701_1
    • Baumeister, R. F., Heatherton, T. F., & Tice, D. M. (1994). Losing control: How and why people fail at self-regulation. San Diego, CA: Academic.
    • Bollen, K., & Long, J. (Eds.) (1993). Testing structural equation models. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
    • Bray, G. (1978). Definition, measurement, and classification of the syndromes of obesity. International Journal of Obesity, 2, 99-112.
    • Bundesamt für Sport (Eds.) (2009). Gesundheitswirksame Bewegung [Health benefits of physical activity]. Magglingen: Bundesamt für Sport.
    • Carver, C. S., & Scheier, M. F. (1998). On the self-regulation of behavior. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
    • Cortina, J. M. (1993). What is coefficient alpha? An examination of theory and applications. Journal of Applied Psychology, 78, 98-104. doi:10.1037/0021- 9010.78.1.98
    • Dawson, J. F., & Richter, A. W. (2006). Probing three-way interactions in moderated multiple regression: Development and application of a slope difference test. Journal of Applied Psychology, 91(4), 917-926. doi:10.1037/0021-9010.91.4.917
    • The Department of Health (2012). About the eatwell plate. Retrieved 12, 2012, from http://www.dh.gov.uk/health/2012/06/about-the-eatwell-plate/ 21
    • Radtke, T., Scholz, U., Keller, R., Knäuper, B., & Hornung, R. (2011). Smokingspecific Compensatory Health Beliefs and the readiness to stop smoking in adolescents. British Journal of Health Psychology, 16(3), 610-625. doi:10.1348/2044-8287.002001
    • Renner, B., Hahn, A., & Schwarzer, R. (1996). Risiko- und Gesundheitsverhalten. Dokumentation der Meßinstrumente des Forschungsprojekts „Berlin risk appraisal and health motivation study“ (BRAHMS) [Risk and health behaviours documentation of the scales of the research project: „Berlin risk appraisal and health motivation study“ (BRAHMS)]. Berlin, DE: Freie Universität Berlin.
    • Renner, B., Schwarzer, R., Kwon, S., Spivak, Y., & Panzer, M. (2005). Risk and health behaviors documentation of the scales of the research project: “Risk appraisal consequences in Korea” (RACK) 2nd edition. Retrieved from http://www. gesundheitsrisiko.de/docs/RACKEnglish.pdf
    • Scholz, U., Nagy, G., Göhner, W., Luszczynska, A., & Kliegel, M. (2009). Changes in self-regulatory cognitions as predictors of changes in smoking and nutrition behaviour. Psychology and Health, 24(5), 545-561. doi:10.1080/08870440801902519
    • Schwarzer, R. (1992). Self-efficacy in the adoption and maintenance of health behaviors. Theoretical approaches and a new model. In R. Schwarzer (Ed.), Selfefficacy: thought control of action (pp. 217-242). Washington, DC: Hemisphere.
    • Schwarzer, R. (2008). Modelling health behaviour change: how to predict and modify the adoption and maintenance of health behaviour. Applied Psychology: An International Review, 57(1), 1-29. doi:10.1111/j.1464-0597.2007.00325.x 24
  • No related research data.
  • Discovered through pilot similarity algorithms. Send us your feedback.

Share - Bookmark

Cite this article