Remember Me
Or use your Academic/Social account:


Or use your Academic/Social account:


You have just completed your registration at OpenAire.

Before you can login to the site, you will need to activate your account. An e-mail will be sent to you with the proper instructions.


Please note that this site is currently undergoing Beta testing.
Any new content you create is not guaranteed to be present to the final version of the site upon release.

Thank you for your patience,
OpenAire Dev Team.

Close This Message


Verify Password:
Verify E-mail:
*All Fields Are Required.
Please Verify You Are Human:
fbtwitterlinkedinvimeoflicker grey 14rssslideshare1
Publisher: Elsevier BV
Languages: English
Types: Article
Subjects: TL
Full cost accounting has been applied in many industrial settings that include the oil and gas, energy, chemical and waste management industries. Presently, it is not known how it can be applied in an automotive industry context. Therefore, the objective of this paper is to review existing full cost accounting methods and identify an appropriate approach for the automotive sector. This literature review of 4381 papers extracted ten full cost accounting methods with a diverse level of development and consistency in application. Based on a careful examination and critical analysis of each approach and existing automotive sustainability measures, the Sustainability Assessment Model developed by British Petroleum and Aberdeen University has been proposed as a well-developed and potentially practical tool for automotive applications. The Sustainability Assessment Model can be used by both academics and practitioners to translate a range of conflicting sustainability information into a monetary unit score. This is an effective way of communicating trade-offs and outcomes for complex and multi-disciplinary sustainable decisions in the automotive sector. It measures a broad range of economic, environmental, resource and social effects (internal and external), which is currently lacking in existing automotive systems. Its other strengths are the ability to provide both monetary and physical metrics for sustainability assessment, its flexibility and the ability to combine multiple sustainability dimensions. Furthermore, this paper provides helpful clues for researchers interested in exploring full cost accounting in the future by reviewing, analysing and synthesising the broad range of relevant sources from diverse fields in this topic area.
  • The results below are discovered through our pilot algorithms. Let us know how we are doing!

    • Antheaume, N., 2004. Valuing external costsefrom theory to practice: implications for full cost environmental accounting. Eur. Account. Rev. 13, 443e464.
    • Antheaume, N., 2007. Full cost accounting: Adam Smith meets Rachel Carson. In: Unerman, J., Bebbington, J., O'Dwyer, B. (Eds.), Sustainability Accounting and Accountability. Routledge, London, New York, pp. 211e225.
    • Atkinson, G., 2000. Measuring corporate sustainability. J. Environ. Plan. Manag. 43, 235e252.
    • Atrill, P., McLaney, E., 2006. Accounting and Finance for Non-specialists. Prentice Hall, Harlow.
    • Baxter, T., Bebbington, J., Cutteridge, D., 2004. Sustainability assessment model: modelling economic, resource, environmental and social flows of a project. In: Henriques, A., Richardson, J. (Eds.), The Triple Bottom Line: Does it All Add up. Earthscan, London, pp. 113e120.
    • Baxter, T., Bebbington, J., Cutteridge, D., Harvey, G., 2003. The Sustainability Assessment Model (SAM): Measuring Sustainable Development Performance. Offshore Europe, 2.
    • Bebbington, J., 2007. Accounting for Sustainable Development Performance. CIMA, Oxford.
    • Bebbington, J., Brown, J., Frame, B., 2007. Accounting technologies and sustainability assessment models. Ecol. Econ. 61, 224e236.
    • Bebbington, J., Frame, B., 2003. Moving from SD reporting to evaluation: the sustainability assessment model. Chart. Account. J. N. Z. 82, 11e13.
    • Bebbington, J., Gray, R., 2001. An account of sustainability: failure, success and a reconceptualization. Crit. Perspect. Account. 12, 557e588.
    • Bebbington, J., Gray, R., Hibbitt, C., Kirk, E., 2001. Full Cost Accounting: an Agenda for Action. Certified Accountants Educational Trust, London, UK.
    • Bebbington, J., Macgreagor, B., 2005. Modelling and Accounting for Sustainable Development. RICS Fundation, London.
    • Bent, D., 2006. Towards a monetised triple bottom line for an alcohol producer. Using stakeholder dialogue to Negotiate a 'Licence to Operate' by constructing an account of social performance. In: Schaltegger, S., Bennett, M., Burritt, R. (Eds.), Sustainability Accounting and Reporting. Springer, pp. 61e82.
    • Bent, D., Richardson, J., 2003. The SIGMA Guidelines-toolkit: Sustainability Accounting Guide. Singma Project, London.
    • Bickel, P., Friedrich, R., 2004. ExternE: Externalities of Energy: Methodology 2005 Update. European Commission, Luxemburg.
    • Bickel, P., Schmid, S., Krewitt, W., Friedrich, R., 1997. External Costs of Transport in ExternE. The European Commission, Brussels.
    • Bogesk€ar, M., Carter, A., Neven, C.-,O., Nuij, R., Schmincke, Eva, Stranddorf, Heidi, 2002. Evaluation of Environmental Product Declaration Scheme. European Commission DG Environment.
    • Booth, A., Papaioannou, D., Sutton, A., 2011. Systematic Approaches to a Successful Literature Review. Sage, London.
    • Burritt, R.L., Hahn, T., Schaltegger, S., 2002. Towards a comprehensive framework for environmental management accountingdLinks between business actors and environmental management accounting tools. Aust. Account. Rev. 12, 39e50.
    • Canadian Institute of Chartered Accountants (CICA), 1997. Full Cost Accounting from an Environmental Perspective. The Canadian Institute of Chartered Accountants, Toronto.
    • Cavanagh, J., 2005. Assessment of Waste Disposal Vs. Resource Recovery. Landcare Research, Lincoln.
    • Cavanagh, J.-A.E., Frame, B., Lennox, J., 2006. The sustainability assessment model (SAM): measuring sustainable development performance. Australas. J. Environ. Manag. 13, 142e145.
    • Cavanagh, J., Frame, B.R., Fraser, M., Gabe, G., 2007. Experiences of applying a sustainability assessment model. International conference on whole life urban sustainability and its assessment. In: SUE-MoT Conference Proceedings. Glasgow, 2007.
    • Center for Waste Reduction Technologies (CWRT), 1999. Total Cost Assessment Methodology: Internal Managerial Decision Making Tool. American Institute of Chemical Engineers, USA.
    • Centre for Reviews and Dissemination (CRD), 2009. Systematic Reviews: CRD's Guidance for Undertaking Reviews in Health Care. University of York: CRD.
    • Ceulemans, K., Molderez, I., Van Liedekere, L., 2014. Sustainability reporting in higher education: a comprehensive review of the recent literature and paths for further research. J. Clean. Prod. (in press).
    • Davies, J., 2009. The application of full cost accounting in a higher education context-development of a methodological approach. In: 1st International Conference on Sustainable Management of Public and Not for Profit Organisations, University of Bologna, 2009.
    • Debnath, S., Bose, S., 2014. Exploring full cost accounting approach to evaluate cost of MSW services in India. Resour. Conserv. Recycl. 83, 87e95.
    • Denyer, D., Tranfield, D., 2009. Producing a systematic review. In: Buchanan, D., Bryman, A. (Eds.), Organisational Research Methods. SAGE Publications Ltd, London, pp. 671e690.
    • Elkington, J., 1999. Cannibals with Forks the Triple Bottom Line of 21st Century Business. Capstone, Oxford.
    • Enderle, P., Nowak, O., Kvas, J., 2012. Potential alternative for water and energy savings in the automotive industry: case study for an Austrian automotive supplier. J. Clean. Prod. 34, 146e152.
    • Epstein, M.J., 1996. Improving environmental management with full environmental cost accounting. Environ. Qual. Manag. 6, 11e22.
    • Epstein, P.R., Buonocore, J.J., Eckerle, K., Hendryx, M., Stout III, B.M., Heinberg, R., Clapp, R.W., May, B., Rinhart, N.L., Ahern, M.M., 2011. Full cost accounting for the life cycle of coal. Annu. N. Y. Acad. Sci. 1219, 73e98.
    • Figge, F., Hahn, T., 2004. Sustainable value addeddmeasuring corporate contributions to sustainability beyond eco-efficiency. Ecol. Econ. 48, 173e187.
    • Figge, F., Hahn, T., 2005. The cost of sustainability capital and the creation of sustainable value by companies. J. Industrial Ecol. 9, 47e58.
    • Figge, F., Hahn, T., Barkemeyer, R., Liesen, A., 2008. Sustainable Value in Automobile Manufacturing. Sustainable Value Research Ltd, Berlin.
    • Fiksel, J.R., 2009. Design for Environment : a Guide to Sustainable Product Development. McGraw-Hill, New York.
    • Fink, A., 2014. Conducting Research Literature Reviews: from the Internet to Paper. SAGE Publications Ltd, London.
    • Forum for the Future (FFF), 2003. The Sigma Guidelines - Toolkit: Sigma Environmental Accounting Guide. Forum for the Future, London.
    • Frame, B., Cavanagh, J., 2009. Experiences of sustainability assessment: an awkward adolescence. Account. Forum 195e208.
    • Fraser, M., 2012. “Fleshing out” an engagement with a social accounting technology. Account. Auditing Account. J. 25, 508e534.
    • Friedrich, R., Bickel, P. (Eds.), 2001. Environmental External Costs of Transport. Springer Science & Business Media.
    • Geels, F., Kemp, R., Dudley, G., Lyons, G., 2011. Automobility in Transition?: a Sociotechnical Analysis of Sustainable Transport. Routledge, New York.
    • Graedel, T., Allenby, B., 1998. Industrial Ecology and the Automobile. Prentice Hall, New Jersey.
    • Gray, R., 1992. Accounting and environmentalism: an exploration of the challenge of gently accounting for accountability, transparency and sustainability. Accounting, Organ. Soc. 17, 399e425.
    • Guinee, J., Gorree, M., Heijungs, R., Huppes, G., Kleijn, R., 2002. Handbook on Life Cycle Assessment: Operational Guide to the ISO Standards. Kluwar Academic, Dordrecht, Netherlands, 2002.
    • Hendrickson, C., Horvath, A., Joshi, S., Lave, L., 1998. Economic input-output models for environmental life cycle assessment. Environ. Sci. Technol. (April), 184e191.
    • Howes, R., 2000. Corporate environmental accounting: accounting for environmentally sustainable profit. In: Simon, S., Proops, J. (Eds.), Greening the Accounts. Edward Elgar, Cheltenham, pp. 223e246.
    • Howes, R., 2002. Environmental Cost Accounting: an Introduction and Practical Guide. CIMA, London.
    • Howes, R., 2004. Environmental cost accounting: coming of age? Tracking organisational performance towards environmental sustainability. In: Henriques, A., Richardson, J. (Eds.), The Triple Bottom Line: Does it All Add up. Earthscan, London, 99-112-120.
    • Huizing, A., Dekker, H.C., 1992. Helping to pull our planet out of the red: an environmental report of BSO/Origin. Accounting. Organ. Soc. 17, 449e458.
    • Jasch, C., 2003. The use of Environmental Management Accounting (EMA) for identifying environmental costs. J. Clean. Prod. 11, 667e676.
    • Jasch, C., Savage, D.E., 2009. The IFAC international guidance document on environmental management accounting. In: Schaltegger, S., Bennett, M., Burritt, R., Jasch, C. (Eds.), Environmental Management Accounting for Cleaner Production. Springer, pp. 321e336.
    • Jesson, J., Matheson, L., Lacey, F., 2011. Doing Your Literature Review: Traditional and Systematic Techniques. SAGE, Los Angeles, London.
    • Joshi, S., 1999. Product environmental life cycle assessment using input-output techniques. J. Industrial Ecol. 2e3, 95e120.
    • Karagiannidis, A., Xirogiannopoulou, A., Tchobanoglous, G., 2008. Full cost accounting as a tool for the financial assessment of Pay-As-You-Throw schemes: a case study for the Panorama municipality, Greece. Waste Manag. 28, 2801e2808.
    • Khan, F., Sadiq, R., Veitch, B., 2004. Life cycle iNdeX (LInX): a new indexing procedure for process and product design and decision-making. J. Clean. Prod. 12, 59e76.
    • Kitchenham, B., Charters, S., 2007. Procedures for Performing Systematic Literature Reviews in Software Engineering. Keele University and University of Durham, Keele and Durham.
    • Klewitz, J., Hansen, E.G., 2014. Sustainability-oriented innovation of SMEs: a systematic review. J. Clean. Prod. 65, 57e75.
    • Krewitt, W., 2002. External costs of energydDo the answers match the questions?: looking back at 10 years of ExternE. Energy Policy 30, 839e848.
    • Luo, L., van der Voet, E., Huppes, G., de Haes, H.A.U., 2009. Allocation issues in LCA methodology: a case study of corn stover-based fuel ethanol. Int. J. Life Cycle Assess. 14, 529e539.
    • Lynch, R.L., Cross, K.F., 1995. Measure up!: Yardsticks for Continuous Improvement. Blackwell Publishers Ltd, Oxford.
    • Maclean, H.L., Lave, L.B., 2003. Life cycle assessment of automobile/fuel options. Environ. Sci. Technol. 37, 5445e5452.
    • Makhsous, M., Hendrix, R., Crowther, Z., Nam, E., Lin, F., 2005. Reducing whole-body vibration and musculoskeletal injury with a new car seat design. Ergonomics 48, 1183e1199.
    • Mayyas, A., Qattawi, A., Omar, M., Shan, D., 2012. Design for sustainability in automotive industry: a comprehensive review. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 16, 1845e1862.
    • Mayyas, A., Shen, Q., Mayyas, A., Shan, D., Qattawi, A., Omar, M., 2011. Using quality function deployment and analytical hierarchy process for material selection of body-in-white. Mater. Des. 32, 2771e2782.
    • Mayyas, A.T., Qattawi, A., Mayyas, A.R., Omar, M., 2013. Quantifiable measures of sustainability: a case study of materials selection for eco-lightweight autobodies. J. Clean. Prod. 40, 177e189.
    • Mildenberger, U., Khare, A., 2000. Planning for an environment-friendly car. Technovation 20, 205e214.
    • Milne, M.J., 1991. Accounting, environmental resource values, and non-market valuation techniques for environmental resources: a review. Account. Auditing Account. J. 4.
    • Orsato, R.J., Wells, P., 2007. U-turn: the rise and demise of the automobile industry. J. Clean. Prod. 15, 994e1006.
    • Petticrew, M., Roberts, H., 2008. Systematic Reviews in the Social Sciences: a Practical Guide. Blackwell Publishing, Oxford.
    • Pickering, C., Byrne, J., 2013. The benefits of publishing systematic quantitative literature reviews for PhD candidates and other early-career researchers. High. Educ. Res. Dev. 1e15.
    • Pinault-Printemps-Redoute (PPR), 2012. An Expert Review of the Environmental Profit & Loss Account. Kering, Germany.
    • PUMA, 2010. PUMA's Environmental Profit and Loss Account for the Year Ended 31 December 2010. PUMA, Germany.
    • Qian, W., Burritt, R., 2009. The development of environmental management accounting: an institutional view. In: Schaltegger, S., Bennett, M., Burritt, R., Jasch, C. (Eds.), Environmental Management Accounting for Cleaner Production. Springer, pp. 233e248.
    • Resetar, S., Camm, F., Drezner, J., 1998. Environmental Management in Design Lessons from Volvo and Hewlett-Packard for the Department of Defense. National Defense Research Institute, Washington D.C.
    • Roth, I.F., Ambs, L.L., 2004. Incorporating externalities into a full cost approach to electric power generation life-cycle costing. Energy 29, 2125e2144.
    • Rubenstein, D.B., 1992. Bridging the gap between green accounting and black ink. Account. Organ. Soc. 17, 501e508.
    • Rubenstein, D.B., 1994. Environmental Accounting for the Sustainable Corporation: Strategies and Techniques. Quorum Books, Westport, Connecticut.
    • Russell, D., 2011. The sustainability debate and accounting. In: Critical Studies on Corporate Responsibility, Governance and Sustainability, vol. 3, pp. 193e218.
    • Schaltegger, S., Burritt, R., 2000. Contemporary Environmental Accounting: Issues, Concepts and Practice. Greenleaf Publishing Limited, Sheffield.
    • Schmidt, W.-P., 2006. Life cycle tools within Ford of Europe's product sustainability Index. Case study Ford S-MAX & Ford Galaxy (8 pp). Int. J. Life Cycle Assess. 11, 315e322.
    • Schmidt, W.-P., 2007. Product Sustainability Index. Ford, Germany.
    • Schmidt, W.-P., Sullivan, J., 2002. Weighting in life cycle assessments in a global context. Int. J. Life Cycle Assess. 7, 5e10.
    • Schmidt, W.-P., Taylor, A., 2006. Ford of Europe's product sustainability index. In: Proceedings of 13th CIRP International Conference on Life Cycle Engineering. Leuven May 31steJune 2nd, 2006, pp. 5e10.
    • Stechemesser, K., Guenther, E., 2012. Carbon accounting: a systematic literature review. J. Clean. Prod. 36, 17e38.
    • Steen, B., 1999. A Systematic Approach to Environmental Priority Strategies in Product Development (EPS): Version 2000-General System Characteristics. Centre for Environmental Assessment of Products and Material Systems.
    • Steen, B., Garling, A., Imrell, A.-M., Sanne, K., 2008a. Development of interpretation keys for environmental product declarations. J. Clean. Prod. 16, 598e604.
    • Steen, B., Holger, R.,H., Hunkeler, D., Lichtenvort, K., Schmidt, W.-P., Spindler, E., 2008b. Integrating external effects into life cycle costing. In: Hunkeler, D.J., Lichtenvort, K., Rebitzer, G., Ciroth, A. (Eds.), Environmental Life Cycle Costing. SETAC in collaboration with CRC Press, Pensacola, Boca Raton, pp. 59e76.
    • Taplin, J.R., Bent, D., Aeron-Thomas, D., 2006. Developing a sustainability accounting framework to inform strategic business decisions: a case study from the chemicals industry. Bus. Strategy Environ. 15, 347e360.
    • The International Federation of Accountants (IFAC), 1998. Environmental Management in Organisations: the Role of Management Accounting. IFAC, New York.
    • Tol, R.S., 2009. The economic effects of climate change. J. Econ. Perspect. 29e51.
    • United States Environment Protection Agency (USEPA), 1996. Full Cost Accounting for Decision Making at Ontario Hydro. DIANE Publishing.
    • United States Environment Protection Agency (USEPA), 1997. Full Cost Accounting for Municipal Solid Waste Management: a Handbook. DIANE Publishing.
    • United States Environment Protection Agency (USEPA), 1998. Full Cost Accounting in Action: Case Studies of Six Solid Waste Management Agencies. DIANE Publishing.
    • United States Environment Protection Agency (USEPA), 2008. Average Annual Emissions and Fuel Consumption for Gasoline-fueled Passenger Cars and Light Trucks. Office of Transportation and Air Quality.
    • Wiedmann, T., Lenzen, M., 2009. Unravelling the impacts of Supply Chainsda new triple-bottom-line accounting approach and software tool. In: Schaltegger, S., Bennett, M., Burritt, R., Jasch, C. (Eds.), Environmental Management Accounting for Cleaner Production. Springer, pp. 65e90.
    • Wilson, P., 1992. Searching: strategies and evaluation. In: White, D., Bates, M., Wilson, P. (Eds.), For Information Specialists: Interpretations of Reference and Bibliographic Work. Ablex, New Jersey, pp. 153e181.
    • Woodward, D.G., 1997. Life cycle costingdtheory, information acquisition and application. Int. J. Proj. Manag. 15, 335e344.
    • Xing, Y., Horner, R.M.W., El-Haram, M.A., Bebbington, J., 2007. A framework model for assessing sustainability impacts of a built environment. In: International Conference on Whole Life Urban Sustainability and its Assessment, 2007 Glasgow.
    • Xing, Y., Horner, R.M.W., El-Haram, M.A., Bebbington, J., 2009. A framework model for assessing sustainability impacts of urban development. Account. Forum 33, 209e224.
    • Zokaei, K., Lovins, H., Wood, A., Hines, P., 2013. Creating a Lean and Green Business System: Techniques for Improving Profits and Sustainability. CRC Press, Boca Raton.
  • No related research data.
  • No similar publications.

Share - Bookmark

Cite this article