Remember Me
Or use your Academic/Social account:


Or use your Academic/Social account:


You have just completed your registration at OpenAire.

Before you can login to the site, you will need to activate your account. An e-mail will be sent to you with the proper instructions.


Please note that this site is currently undergoing Beta testing.
Any new content you create is not guaranteed to be present to the final version of the site upon release.

Thank you for your patience,
OpenAire Dev Team.

Close This Message


Verify Password:
Verify E-mail:
*All Fields Are Required.
Please Verify You Are Human:
fbtwitterlinkedinvimeoflicker grey 14rssslideshare1
Cabrero, Daniel G.; Winschiers-Theophilus, Heike; Abdelnour-Nocera, Jose; Kapuire, Gereon Koch (2016)
Languages: English
Types: Unknown
Subjects: Information-management, Innovation-and-user-experience

Classified by OpenAIRE into

Persona is a tool broadly used in technology design to support communicational interactions between designers and users. Different Persona types and methods have evolved mostly in the Global North, and been partially deployed in the Global South every so often in its original User-Centred Design methodology. We postulate persona conceptualizations are expected to differ across cultures. We demonstrate this with an exploratory-case study on user-created persona co-designed with four Namibian ethnic groups: ovaHerero, Ovambo, ovaHimba and Khoisan. We follow a hermeneutic inquiry approach to discern cultural nuances from diverse human conducts. Findings reveal diverse self-representations whereby for each ethnic group results emerge in unalike fashions, viewpoints, recounts and storylines. This paper ultimately argues User-Created Persona as a potentially valid approach for pursuing cross-cultural depictions of personas that communicate cultural features and user experiences paramount to designing acceptable and gratifying technologies in dissimilar locales.
  • The results below are discovered through our pilot algorithms. Let us know how we are doing!

    • [1] Bidwell, N. J. & Winschiers-Theophilus, H. (2012). Extending Connections Between Land and People Digitally: Designing with Rural Herero Communities in Namibia. In Giaccardi, E., Heritage and Social Media: Understanding heritage in a participatory culture, (pp. 197- 216). Routledge.
    • [2] Bødker, S., Christiansen, E., Nyvang, T., & Zander, P.-O. (2012). Personas, people and participation: challenges from the trenches of local government. In Proc. of the PDC'12 (Vol. 1, pp. 91-100). Roskilde, Denmark: ACM Press.
    • [3] Cabrero, D. G. (2014). Participatory design of persona artefacts for user eXperience in non-WEIRD cultures. In Proc. of the PDC'14 (Vol. 2, pp. 247-250). Windhoek, Namibia: ACM Press.
    • [4] Cabrero, D. G. (2015). User-Created Persona: Namibian rural Otjiherero speakers. In Proc. of the SIGDOC'15. Limerick, Ireland: ACM Press.
    • [5] Chavan, A. L., & Prabhu, G. V. (Eds.). (2011). Innovative Solutions: What Designers Need to Know for Today's Emerging Markets. Boca Raton, London: CRC Press.
    • [6] Cooper, A. (1998). The Inmates Are Running the Asylum: Why High Tech Products Drive Us Crazy and How to Restore the Sanity. Indianapolis, USA: Sams Publishing.
    • [7] Davies, G. (1994). The Ovambo in Context: The People, Their Land and European Colonisation, Chap 1.
    • [8] Dearden, A., Lauener, A., Slack, F., Roast, C., & Cassidy, S. (2006). Make it so! Jean-Luc Picard, Bart Simpson and the Design of E-Public Services. In Proc. of the PDC'06 (Vol. 1, pp. 67-76). Trento, Italy: ACM Press.
    • [9] Dearden, A., & Rizvi, H. (2008). Adapting participatory and agile software methods to participatory rural development. In Proc. of the PDC'08 (pp. 221-225). Florence, Italy: Indiana University.
    • [10] Dourish, P., & Mainwaring, S. D. (2012). Ubicomp´s Colonial Impulse. In Proc. of the UbiComp' 12 (pp. 133- 142). ACM Press.
    • [11] Escobar, A. (1995). Encountering development. Princeton, New Jersey: Princeton University Press.
    • [12] Friess, E. (2012). Personas and decision making in the design process: an ethnographic case study. In Proc. of the SIGCHI Conference (pp. 1209-1218). Austin, USA: ACM Press.
    • [13] Geertz, C. (1974). "From the Native's Point of View": On the Nature of Anthropological Understanding. Bulletin of the American Academy of Arts and Sciences, 28(1), 26-45.
    • [14] Getto, G., & Amant, K. S. (2014). Designing globally, working locally. Communication Design Quarterly Review, 3(1), 24-46.
    • [15] Grudin, J. (2003). The west wing: fiction can serve politics. Scandinavian Journal of Information Systems,15(1),73-77.
    • [16] Grudin, J., & Pruitt, J. (2002). Personas, participatory design and product development: An infrastructure for engagement. In Proc. PDC '02 (pp. 144-152). Malmo.
    • [17] Heidegger (1962). Being and Time.
    • [18] Hisham, S. (2009). Experimenting with the use of persona in a focus group discussion with older adults in Malaysia. In Proc. OZCHI'09 (pp. 333-336). Melbourne, Australia: ACM Press.
    • [19] Kapuire, G. K., Winschiers-Theophilus, H., & Blake, E. (2014). An insider perspective on community gains: A subjective account of a Namibian rural communities׳ perception of a long-term participatory design project. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 1-20.
    • [20] Lecomte, C., Blanco, E., Trompette, P., & Cholez, C. (2013). Towards a Better Frugal Design using Persona: issues and insights from an ethnography on prosthetics in Vietnam. In Proc. 1st IICCI (pp. 1-19). Paris, France.
    • [21] Light, A. (2011). Democratising technology: making transformation using designing, performance and props. In Proc. of the CHI'11 (pp. 2239-2242). ACM Press.
    • [22] Light, A., Brereton, M., & Roe, P. (2015). Some Notes on the Design of 'World Machines'. In Proc. of the OzCHI'15 (pp. 289-293). Melbourne, VIC, Australia: ACM Press.
    • [23] Light, A., Simpson, G., Weaver, L., & Healey, P. G. (2009). Geezers, turbines, fantasy personas: making the everyday into the future. In Proc. of the C&C'09 (pp. 39- 48). Berkeley, California, USA: ACM Press.
    • [24] Madu, R. O. (1992). African symbols, proverbs, and myths: the hermeneutics of destiny. P. Lang, New York.
    • [25] Nghiulikwa, R. V. (2008). Re-situating and shifting cultural identity in contemporary Namibia. University of the Western Cape, South Africa.
    • [26] Nielsen, L. (2009). Personas in Cross-Cultural Projects. In D. Katre, R. Orngreen, P. Yammiyavar, & T. Clemmensen (Eds.), Proc. of the HWID'09 (pp. 76-82). India: Springer.
    • [27] Nielsen, L. (2012). Acting as Someone Like Me: Personas in Participatory Innovation. In Proc. of the PIN-C 2012 (pp. 1-7). Melbourne, Australia.
    • [28] Nielsen, L. (2013). Personas: User Focused Design. Springer, London, Heidelberg, New York. 2012.
    • [29] Nielsen, L., & Hansen, K. S. (2014). Persona is Applicable: A Study on the Use of Personas in Denmark. In Proc. of the CHI '14 (pp. 1665-1674). Toronto, Canada: ACM Press.
    • [30] Packer, M. J. (1985). Hermeneutic Inquiry in the Study of Human Conduct. American Psych, 40(10), 1081-1092.
    • [31] Pruitt, J., & Grudin, J. (2006). Personas: Practice and Theory. Design Studies: Human-Centered Design (313- 334).
    • [32] Putnam, C., Kolko, B., & Wood, S. (2012). Communicating about users in ICTD: leveraging HCI personas. Proc. of the ICTD'12 (pp. 338-349). Atlanta, Georgia, US, ACM Press.
    • [33] Ricoeur, P. (1995). Oneself as another. University of Chicago Press.
    • [34] Rodil, K., Winschiers-Theophilus, H., & Jensen, K. L. (2012). Enhancing cross-cultural participation through creative visual exploration. In Proc. of the PDC'12 (Vol. 1, pp. 81-90). Roskilde, Denmark: ACM Press.
    • [35] Rönkkö, K., Hellman, M., Kilander, B., & Dittrich, Y. (2004). Personas is not applicable: local remedies interpreted in a wider context. Proc. of the PDC'04 (Vol. 1, pp. 112-120). ACM Press.
    • [36] Sanders, E. B.-N. (2002). From User-Centered to Participatory Design Approaches, Design and the Social Sciences: Making Connections (pp. 1-8). Taylor & Francis.
    • [37] Sarat St. Peter, H. A. (2015). Communicating User Experience: 'Wicked' Problems, Patchwork Personas, and the ICTD Project Lifecycle. International Journal of Sociotechnology and Knowledge Development, 7(2),14-26.
    • [38] Sarkin-Hughes, J. (2009). Colonial Genocide and Reparations Claims in the 21st Century: The Socio-Legal Context of Claims under International Law by the Herero against Germany for Genocide in Namibia, 1904-1908. Westport, Connecticut and London: Praeger Security International.
    • [39] Stanley, C., Winschiers-Theophilus, H., Blake, E., & Rodil, K. (2015). Ovahimba community in Namibia ventures into crowdsourcing design. In Proc. of the IFIP WG 9.4. Negombo, Sri Lanka.
    • [40] Stell, G., Fox, T. (2015). Ethnicity in discourse: the interactional negotiation of ethnic boundaries in postapartheid Namibia. Ethnic & Racial Studies.38(6),976-992
    • [41] Suzman, J. (2001) Regional Assessment of the Status of the San in Southern Africa, Report Series in Suzman, J., Legal Assistance Centre (LAC), Windhoek.
    • [42] Tötemeyer, G. (2014). Namibia Today: Challenges and Obstacles to Reconciliation and Stability. Namibia Institute for Democracy.
    • [43] van Doorn, F., Stappers, P. J., & Gielen, M. (2013). Design research by proxy: using children as researchers to gain contextual knowledge about user experience. Proc. of the CHI'13 (pp. 2883-2892). Paris, France: ACM Press.
    • [44] Vestergaard, L., Hauge, B., Thorp Hansen, C. (2016). Almost like being there: the power of personas when designing for foreign cultures. CoDesign. 1-18.
    • [45] Walker, K., Underwood, J., Waema, T., Dunckley, L., Abdelnour-Nocera, J., Luckin, R., Camara, S. (2008). A resource kit for participatory socio-technical design in rural Kenya. Proc. of CHI'08 (pp. 2709-2714). Florence, Italy: ACM Press.
    • [46] Williams, I., Brereton, M., Donovan, J., & McDonald, K. (2014). A Collaborative Rapid Persona-Building Workshop: Creating Design Personas with Health Researchers. International Journal of Sociotechnology and Knowledge Development, 6(2), 17-35.
    • [47] Winschiers-Theophilus, H. (2006). Being participated: a community approach. In Proc. of the PDC'10 (pp. 1-10). Sydney, Australia: ACM Press.
    • [48] Winschiers-Theophilus, H. (2009). The Art of CrossCultural Design for Usability. In Universal Access in HCI (C. Stephanidis (Ed.), pp. 665-671). Springer, Berlin.
    • [49] Zaman, T., & Winschiers-Theophilus, H. (2015). Penan's Oroo' Short Message Signs (PO-SMS): Co-design of a Digital Jungle Sign Language Application. In Proc. of the INTERACT'15. Bamberg, Germany: ACM Press.
  • No related research data.
  • No similar publications.

Share - Bookmark

Download from

Cite this article