LOGIN TO YOUR ACCOUNT

Username
Password
Remember Me
Or use your Academic/Social account:

CREATE AN ACCOUNT

Or use your Academic/Social account:

Congratulations!

You have just completed your registration at OpenAire.

Before you can login to the site, you will need to activate your account. An e-mail will be sent to you with the proper instructions.

Important!

Please note that this site is currently undergoing Beta testing.
Any new content you create is not guaranteed to be present to the final version of the site upon release.

Thank you for your patience,
OpenAire Dev Team.

Close This Message

CREATE AN ACCOUNT

Name:
Username:
Password:
Verify Password:
E-mail:
Verify E-mail:
*All Fields Are Required.
Please Verify You Are Human:
fbtwitterlinkedinvimeoflicker grey 14rssslideshare1
Languages: English
Types: Article
Subjects: HD28, LB2300
There is a large literature on the productivity of universities. Little is known, however, about how different types of leader affect a university's later performance. To address this, I blend quantitative and qualitative evidence. By constructing a new longitudinal dataset, I find that on average the research quality of a university improves some years after it appoints a president (vice chancellor) who is an accomplished scholar. To try to explain why scholar-leaders might improve the research performance of their institutions, I draw from interview data with 26 heads in universities in the United States and United Kingdom. The findings have policy implications for governments, universities, and a range of research and knowledge-intensive organizations.
  • The results below are discovered through our pilot algorithms. Let us know how we are doing!

    • Adams, J. D., Black, G. C., Clemmons, J. R. & Stephan, P. E. 2005. Scientific teams and institutional collaborations: Evidence from US universities, 1981-1999. Research Policy, 34, 259-285.
    • Adams, J. D., & Clemmons, J. R. 2011. The role of search in university productivity: inside, outside, and interdisciplinary dimensions. Industrial and Corporate Change, 34, 259-285.
    • Agrawal, A., McHale, J. & Oettl, A. 2013. Why stars matter. NBER Working Paper 20012.
    • Andrews, F. 1979. Scientific productivity: The effectiveness of research groups in six different countries. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
    • Andrews, F. M. & Farris, G. F. 1967. Supervisory practices and innovation in scientific teams.
    • Personnel Psychology, 20, 497-515.
    • Antonakis, J., Bendahan, S., Jacquart, P. & Lalive, R. 2010. On making causal claims: A review and recommendations. Leadership Quarterly, 21 (6), 1086-1120.
    • Azoulay, P., Zivin, J. S. G., & Wang, J. 2010. Superstar extinction. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 125(2), 549-589.
    • Azoulay, P., Zivin, J. S. G. & Manso, G. 2011. Incentives and creativity: Evidence from the academic life sciences. RAND Journal of Economics, 42 (3), 527-554.
    • Barnowe, J.T. 1975. Leadership and performance outcomes in research organizations.
    • Organizational Behavior and Human Performance, 14, 264-280.
    • Beerkens, M. 2013. Facts and fads in academic research management: The effect of management practices on research productivity in Australia. Research Policy, 42(9), 1679-1693.
    • Bloom, N. & J. Van Reenen 2007. Measuring and explaining management practices across firms and countries. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 122(4), 1351- 1408.
    • Blume, S.S. & Sinclair, R. 1973. Chemists in British universities: a study of the reward system in science. American Sociological Review, 38 (1), 126-138.
    • Carroll, J. B., & Wolverton, M. 2004.
    • Education, 126, 3-10.
    • Laband, D.N. 1986. Article popularity. Economic Inquiry, 24, 173-180.
    • Laband, D.N. 2013. On the use and abuse of economics journal rankings. Economic Journal, 123, F223-F 254.
    • Laband, D.N., & Sophocleus, J.P. 1985. Revealed preference for economics journals - citations as dollar votes. Public Choice, 46, 317-324.
    • McAuley, J. Duberley, S. & Cohen, L. 2000. The meaning professional give to management and strategy. Human Relations, 53, 87-116.
    • McCormack, J., Propper , C. & Smith, S. 2013. Herding cats? Management and university performance. Working Paper No. 13/308, Centre for Market and Public Organisation, Bristol University (June).
    • McDowell, J., Singell, L. D., & Stater, M. 2009. Congratulations or condolences? The role of human capital in the cultivation of a university administrator. Economics of Education Review, 28 (2), 258-267.
    • McDowell, J., Singell, L., & Stater, M. 2011. On (and off) the hot seat: An analysis of entry into and out of university administration. Industrial & Labour Relations Review, 64 (5), 889-909.
    • Moore, W. J., Newman, R. J., & Turnbull, G. K. 2003. Internal markets for department chairs: Comparative advantage, life-cycle, and jury duty. Journal of Labor Research, 24 (4), 669-682.
    • Mumford, M. D., Marks, M. A., Connelly, M. S., Zaccaro, S. J., & Reiter-Palmon, R. 2000.
    • Development of leadership skills: experience, timing, and growth. Leadership Quarterly, 11, 87- 114.
    • Mumford, M. D., Scott, G. M., Gaddis, B., & Strange, J. M. 2002. Leading creative people: Orchestrating expertise and relationships. Leadership Quarterly, 13(6), 705-750.
    • Ness, R. B. & Samet, J. M. 2010. How to be a department chair of epidemiology: a survival guide. American Journal of Epidemiology, 172 (7), 747-51.
    • Oettl, A. 2012a. Reconceptualizing stars: Scientist helpfulness and peer performance.
    • Management Science, 58(6), 1122-1140.
    • In All Years 1995 through 2010 0.081 0.126 0.224
  • No related research data.
  • No similar publications.

Share - Bookmark

Download from

Cite this article