LOGIN TO YOUR ACCOUNT

Username
Password
Remember Me
Or use your Academic/Social account:

CREATE AN ACCOUNT

Or use your Academic/Social account:

Congratulations!

You have just completed your registration at OpenAire.

Before you can login to the site, you will need to activate your account. An e-mail will be sent to you with the proper instructions.

Important!

Please note that this site is currently undergoing Beta testing.
Any new content you create is not guaranteed to be present to the final version of the site upon release.

Thank you for your patience,
OpenAire Dev Team.

Close This Message

CREATE AN ACCOUNT

Name:
Username:
Password:
Verify Password:
E-mail:
Verify E-mail:
*All Fields Are Required.
Please Verify You Are Human:
fbtwitterlinkedinvimeoflicker grey 14rssslideshare1
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Languages: English
Types: Article
Subjects: BF

Classified by OpenAIRE into

ACM Ref: GeneralLiterature_INTRODUCTORYANDSURVEY
While flirting is a relatively under-researched area within psychology, we know even less about how people cyber-flirt. This paper explores how often individuals flirt offline compared to online. Moreover, it attempts to examine how men and women flirt within these different spaces. Five thousand, six hundred and ninety seven individuals, of which 3554 (62%) were women and 2143 (38%) were men, completed a survey about their flirting behaviour both in face-to-face interactions and in Chat Rooms. The first hypothesis, which stated that the body would be used to flirt with as frequently online as offline, was partly supported. However, it was found that individuals downplayed the importance of physical attractiveness online. Women flirted by displaying non-verbal signals (offline) or substitutes for non-verbal cues (online), to a greater extent than men. In Chat Rooms men were more likely than women to initiate contact. It was concluded that cyber-flirting is more than simply a meeting of minds and that future research needs to consider the role of the body in online interactions.
  • The results below are discovered through our pilot algorithms. Let us know how we are doing!

    • Buss, D. M. (1988). The evolution of human intrasexual competition: Tactics of mate attraction. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 54 (4), 616-628.
    • Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
    • Feinberg, L. S. (1996). Teasing: Innocent fun or sadistic malice? Far Hills, NJ, US: New Horizon Press.
    • Givens, D. (1978). The nonverbal basis of attraction: Flirtation, courtship, and seduction. Psychiatry, 41, 346-359.
    • Hall, J. A. (1984). Nonverbal sex differences: Communication accuracy and expressive style. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.
    • Harrison, A. & Saeed, L. (1977). Let's make a deal: An analysis of revelations and stipulations in lonely hearts advertisements. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 38, 604-617.
    • Kenrick, D. T., Groth, G. E., Trost, M. R., & Sadalla, E. K. (1993). Integrating evolutionary and social exchange perspectives on relationships: Effects of gender, selfappraisal, and involvement level on mate selection criteria. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 64(6), 951-969.
    • Kenrick, D. T., Sadalla, E. K., Groth, G., & Trost, M. R. (1990). Evolution, traits, and the stages of human courtship: Qualifying the parental investment model. Journal of Personality, 58(1), 97-116.
    • Koeppel, L. B., Montagne Miller, Y., O'Hair, D., & Cody, M. J. (1993). Friendly? Flirting? Wrong?, In P. J. Kalbfleisch (Ed). (1993). Interpersonal communication: Evolving interpersonal relationships. Communication. (pp. 19-45). Hillsdale, N. J.: Erlbaum.
    • Koestner, R., & Wheeler, L. (1988). Self-presentation in personal advertisements: The influence of implicit notions of attraction and role expectations. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 5(2), 149-160.
    • McCormick, N. B., & Jones, A. J. (1989). Gender differences in nonverbal flirtation. Journal of Sex Education and Therapy, 15(4), 271-282.
    • McCown, J. A., Fischer, D., Page, R., & Homant, M. (2001). Internet relationships: People who meet people. CyberPsychology and Behavior, 4(5), 593-596.
    • McKenna, K. Y. A., Green, A. S., and Gleason, M. E. J. (2002). Relationship formation on the Internet: What's the big attraction? Journal of Social Issues, 58, 659- 671.
    • McRae, S. (1996). Coming apart at the seams: Sex, text and the virtual body. In L. Cherny & E. R. Weise (Eds.), Wired women: Gender and new realities in cyberspace (pp. 242-263). New York: Seal Press.
    • Moore, M. M. (1985). Nonverbal courtship patterns in women: Context and consequences. Ethology and Sociobiology, 6(4), 237-247.
    • Muehlenhard, C. L., Koralewski, M. A., Andrews, S. L., & Burdick, C. A. (1986). Verbal and nonverbal cues that convey interest in dating: Two studies. Behavior Therapy, 17(4), 404-419.
    • Parks, M. R., & Floyd, K. (1996). Making friends in cyberspace. Journal of Communication, 46(1), 80-97.
    • Parks, M. R., & Roberts, L. D. (1998). "Making MOOsic": The development of Personal Relationships on-line and a comparison to their off-line counterparts. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 15, 517-537.
    • Scharlott, B. W. & Christ, W. G. (1995). Overcoming relationship-initiation barriers: The impact of a computer-dating system on sex role, shyness, and appearance inhibitions. Computers in Human Behavior, 11 (2), 191-204.
    • Simmel, G. (1984). Georg Simmel: On women, sexuality, and love. Translated and edited by Kurt H. Wolff. New York: The Free Press.
    • Smith, J. E., Waldorf, V. A. & Trembath, D. L. (1990). "Single white male looking for thin, very attractive…" Sex Roles, 23 (11/12), 675-685.
    • Travis, C. (1977). Men and women report their views on masculinity. Psychology Today, 10, 34-42.
    • Trost, M. R., & Alberts, J. K. (1998). An evolutionary view on understanding sex effects in communicating attraction. In D. J. Canary (Ed.), Sex differences and similarities in communication. Critical essays and empirical investigations of sex and gender in interaction (pp. 233-255). Mahwah, NJ, US: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Inc Publishers..
    • Turkle, S. (1995). Life on the screen: Identity in the age of the Internet. London: Weidenfeld & Nicolson.
    • Whitty, M. T. (2002). Liar, Liar! An examination of how open, supportive and honest people are in Chat Rooms. Computers in Human Behavior, 18(4), 343-352.
    • Whitty, M. T. (2003). Cyber-flirting: Playing at love on the Internet. Theory and Psychology, 13 (3), 339-357.
    • Whitty, M.T. (2004). Peering into online bedroom windows: Considering the ethical implications of investigating Internet relationships and sexuality. In E. Buchanan (Ed.), Readings in Virtual Research Ethics: Issues and Controversies (pp. 203-218). Hershey, USA: Idea Group Inc.
    • Whitty, M.T. & Carr, A.N. (2003). Cyberspace as potential space: Considering the web as a playground to cyber-flirt. Human Relations, 56 (7), 861-891.
    • Whitty, M. T., & Gavin, J. K. (2001). Age/Sex/Location: Uncovering the social cues in the development of online relationships. CyberPsychology & Behavior, 4(5), 623- 630.
  • No related research data.
  • Discovered through pilot similarity algorithms. Send us your feedback.

Share - Bookmark

Cite this article