LOGIN TO YOUR ACCOUNT

Username
Password
Remember Me
Or use your Academic/Social account:

CREATE AN ACCOUNT

Or use your Academic/Social account:

Congratulations!

You have just completed your registration at OpenAire.

Before you can login to the site, you will need to activate your account. An e-mail will be sent to you with the proper instructions.

Important!

Please note that this site is currently undergoing Beta testing.
Any new content you create is not guaranteed to be present to the final version of the site upon release.

Thank you for your patience,
OpenAire Dev Team.

Close This Message

CREATE AN ACCOUNT

Name:
Username:
Password:
Verify Password:
E-mail:
Verify E-mail:
*All Fields Are Required.
Please Verify You Are Human:
fbtwitterlinkedinvimeoflicker grey 14rssslideshare1
Publisher: Taylor & Francis
Languages: English
Types: Article
Subjects: Education
In this paper, we discuss the characteristics of a form of pedagogy capable of addressing difference across nations and cultures in ways that do not inflate difference. We suggest that those conceptual insights are particularly relevant to the teaching of ‘global citizenship’. We have labelled this a ‘worldly’ pedagogy, because of the connection to teaching in a global context, and with reference to Arendt’s concept of ‘worldliness’ and the ‘worldly’ experience of human beings in their plurality sharing a ‘common world’ (Arendt 1958). Our conceptual framework results from our analysis of a specific educational environment which we investigated through a small grant obtained from the Higher Education Academy (UK) that examined the pedagogies used to promote learning amongst two polarised (Palestinian and Israeli) communities. We carried out eight interviews with participants to this programme, and report on the outcomes of this study. This paper contributes to the debate on tribal identities (Beck 2006; Hill 2000; Appiah 2006 for example) through the challenge it offers to positions on difference that display rigid essentialising identity readings and to homogenizing discourses that fail to appreciate the differences within cultures/nations/groups.
  • The results below are discovered through our pilot algorithms. Let us know how we are doing!

    • conflict in global citizenship Oin higher education in Canada. International Journal of Andreotti, V., D. Jefferess, K. Pashby, C. Rowe, P. Tarc, and L. Taylor. 2010. Difference and
    • Development Education and Global Learning 2, no. 3: 5 24. Appiah, A. 2006. CosmCopolitanism: Ethics in a world of strangers. New York: W.W. Norton. Apple, M.W., J. Kenway, and M. Singh.. 2005. Globalizing education: Policies, pedagogies and Arendt, H. 1958. NThe human condition. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
    • politics. New York: Peter Lang. Barnett, R. 2000. Realising the university in an age of supercomplexity. Buckingham: Society for
    • Research Uinto Higher Education and Open University Press. Beck, U. 2006. The cosmopolitan vision. Cambridge: Polity Press. Bhabha, O. 1994. The location of culture. London: Routledge. Bourn, D. 2008. Development education: Debates and dialogues. London: Bedford Way Papers. Carter, A. 2001. The political theory of global citizenship. New York: Routledge. 485 490 495 500 505 510 515 520 525 Caruana, V., and N. Spurling. 2006. The internationalisation of UK higher education: A review
    • he_v2.pdf (accessed January 3, 2011). Cousin, G. 2011. Rethinking the concept of 'western'. Higher Education Research and
    • Development. Cousin, G. and J. Fanghanel. 2009. Report on the evaluation of a reconciliation pedagogy
    • programme. York: Higher Education Academy. http://search3.openobjects.com/kb5/hea/
    • evidencenet/resource.page?record jI3ifzfIpWk (accessed January 21, 2011). Falk, R. 1994. The making of global citizenship. In The condition of citizenship, ed. B. van
    • Steenbergen, 127 40. London: Sage. Frayn, M. 1982. Noises off: A play in three acts. London: Methuen Modern Plays. Hill, J. 2000. Becoming a cosmopolitan: What it means to be a human being in the new
    • millenium. Oxford: Rowman & Littlefield. Hill, J. 2009. Beyond blood identities: Posthumanity in the twenty first century. Plymouth:
    • Roman & Littlefield. King, R. 2004. The university in a global age. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan. Knight, J. 2004. Internationalisation re-modelled: Definition, approaches, and rationales.
    • Journal of Studies in International Education 1, no. 1: 27 44. O Lingard, B., and J. Ozga. 2007. The RoutledgeFalmer reader in education policy and politics. Nixon, J. 2004. Learning the language of deliberative democracy. In Reclaiming universities O
    • from a runaway world, ed. M. Walker and J. Nixon. Buckingham: Open Univ. Press. Nixon, J. 2011. Higher education and the public good: Imagining the university. LonRdon:
    • bridge: Cambridge Univ. Press. P Nussbaum, M.C. 2000. Women and human development: The capabilities approach. CamPerkins, D. 1999. Troublesome knowledge: The many faces of constructivism. Education Ritchie, E. 2006. Internationalisation: Where are we going and how do we Dknow when we have
    • Leadership 57, no. 3: 6 11.
    • got there? Academy Exchange 2006, no. 5: 13 5. Rizvi, F. 2007. Debating globalization and education after SeptemEber11. In The Routledge-
    • Falmer reader in education policy and politics, ed. B. Lingard and J. Ozga, 23 35. London:
    • Routledge. T Sen, A. 1999. Development as freedom. New York: Knopf.
    • Cambridge, MA: Harvard Univ. Press. C Spivak, G. 1999. A critique of postcolonial reason: Toward a critique of the vanishing present.
    • International Review for the Sociology of Sport E41,no. 2: 221 40. Sugden, J. 2006. Teaching and playing sport for conflict resolution and co-existence in Israel. Thatchenkery, T., and C. Metzker. 2006. Appreciative intelligence: Seeing the mighty oak in the
    • acorn. San Francisco: Berrett-Koehler. R Walford, G. 2001. Doing qualitative educational research: A personal guide to the research Walker, M. 2006. Higher education pRedagogies: A capabilities approach. Maidenhead: Society
    • in the sociology of education. OAbingdon: Routledge. Young, M.F.D. 2008. Bringing knowledge back in: From social constructivism to social realism
  • No related research data.
  • Discovered through pilot similarity algorithms. Send us your feedback.

Share - Bookmark

Cite this article