LOGIN TO YOUR ACCOUNT

Username
Password
Remember Me
Or use your Academic/Social account:

CREATE AN ACCOUNT

Or use your Academic/Social account:

Congratulations!

You have just completed your registration at OpenAire.

Before you can login to the site, you will need to activate your account. An e-mail will be sent to you with the proper instructions.

Important!

Please note that this site is currently undergoing Beta testing.
Any new content you create is not guaranteed to be present to the final version of the site upon release.

Thank you for your patience,
OpenAire Dev Team.

Close This Message

CREATE AN ACCOUNT

Name:
Username:
Password:
Verify Password:
E-mail:
Verify E-mail:
*All Fields Are Required.
Please Verify You Are Human:
fbtwitterlinkedinvimeoflicker grey 14rssslideshare1
Publisher: SAGE
Journal: Clinical Rehabilitation
Languages: English
Types: Article
Subjects: feasibility studies, fall prevention intervention, Evaluative Studies, Accidental falls, nursing homes, randomized controlled trial
Objective:\ud To explore the feasibility of implementing and evaluating the Guide to Action Care Home fall prevention intervention.\ud \ud Design:\ud Two-centre, cluster feasibility randomized controlled trial and process evaluation.\ud \ud Setting:\ud Purposive sample of six diverse old age/learning disability, long stay care homes in Nottinghamshire, UK.\ud \ud Subjects:\ud Residents aged over 50 years, who had fallen at least once in the past year, not bed-bound, hoist-dependent or terminally ill.\ud \ud Interventions:\ud Intervention homes (n = 3) received Guide to Action Care Home fall prevention intervention training and support. Control homes (n = 3) received usual care.\ud \ud Outcomes:\ud Recruitment, attrition, baseline and six-month outcome completion, contamination and intervention fidelity, compliance, tolerability, acceptance and impact.\ud \ud Results:\ud A total of 81 of 145 (56%) care homes expressed participatory interest. Six of 22 letter respondent homes (27%) participated. The expected resident recruitment target was achieved by 76% (52/68). Ten (19%) residents did not complete follow-up (seven died, three moved). In intervention homes 36/114 (32%) staff attended training. Two of three (75%) care homes received protocol compliant training. Staff valued the training, but advised greater management involvement to improve intervention implementation. Fall risks were assessed, actioned and recorded in care records. Of 115 recorded falls, 533/570 (93%) of details were complete. Six-month resident fall rates were 1.9 and 4.0 per year for intervention and control homes, respectively.\ud \ud Conclusions:\ud The Guide to Action Care Home is implementable under trial conditions. Recruitment and follow-up rates indicate that a definitive trial can be completed. Falls (primary outcome) can be ascertained reliably from care records.
  • The results below are discovered through our pilot algorithms. Let us know how we are doing!

    • 1. Rapp K, Becker C, Cameron ID, König H-H and Büchele G. Epidemiology of falls in residential aged care: Analysis of more than 70,000 falls from residents of Bavarian nursing homes. J Am Med Directors Assoc 2012; 13: 187. e1-e6.
    • 2. WHO: World Health Organization. WHO global report on falls prevention in older age. Ageing Life Course, Family Comm Health. 2007, pp.1-47.
    • 3. Rapp K, Lamb SE, Klenk J, et al. Fractures after nursing home admission: Incidence and potential consequences. Osteop Inter 2009; 20: 1775-1783.
    • 4. Rubenstein LZ. Falls in older people: Epidemiology, risk factors and strategies for prevention. Age Ageing 2006; 35 ii37-ii41.
    • 5. Gillespie SM and Friedman SM. Fear of falling in new long-term care enrollees. J Am Med Directors Assoc 2007; 8: 307-313.
    • 6. Cameron ID, Gillespie LD, Robertson MC, et al. Interventions for preventing falls in older people in care facilities and hospitals. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2012; 12.
    • 7. Gordon AL, Franklin M, Bradshaw L, Logan P, Elliott R and Gladman JR. Health status of UK care home residents: A cohort study. Age Ageing 2014; 43: 97-103.
    • 8. Robbins I, Gordon A, Dyas J, Logan PA and Gladman J. Explaining the barriers to and tensions in delivering effective healthcare in UK care homes: A qualitative study. BMJ Open 2013; 3: 10.
    • 9. Robertson K, Logan P, Ward M, et al. Thinking fallstaking action: A falls prevention tool for care homes. Br J Comm Nursing 2012; 17: 206-209.
    • 10. Handoll H. Prevention of falls and fall related injuries in older people in nursing homes and hospitals. Injury Prevention 2010; 16: 137-138.
    • 11. Care Quality Commission. Checks on care homes. 2015.
    • 12. Thapa PB, Brockman KG, Gideon P, Fought RL and Ray WA. Injurious falls in nonambulatory nursing home residents: A comparative study of circumstances, incidence, and risk factors. J Am Geriatric Soc 1996; 44: 273-278.
    • 13. Ministry of Justice. Mental Capacity Act. London: Crown Copywright, 2005.
    • 14. Nottingham Clinical Trials Unit. Randomisation and unblinding procedures. 2013.
    • 15. Lamb SE, Jorstad-Stein EC, Hauer K and Becker C. Development of a common outcome data set for fall injury prevention trials: The Prevention of Falls Network Europe consensus. J Am Geriatric Soc 2005; 53: 1618-1622.
    • 16. Wade D and Collin C. The Barthel ADL Index: A standard measure of physical disability? Disabil Rehabil 1988; 10: 64-67.
    • 17. Collin C, Wade DT, Davies S and Horne V. The Barthel ADL Index: A reliability study. Disabil Rehabil 1988; 10: 61-63.
    • 18. NICE: National Institute for Clinical Excellence. Smoking cessation services. NICE public health guidance 10. London: National Institute for Clinical Excellence, 2008.
    • 19. Ritchie J and Lewis J. Qualitative research practice: A guide for social science students and researchers. London: SAGE Publications, 2003.
    • 20. Oliver D, Britton M, Seed P, Martin F and Hopper A. Development and evaluation of evidence based risk assessment tool (STRATIFY) to predict which elderly inpatients will fall: Case-control and cohort studies. BMJ 1997; 315: 1049-1053.
    • 21. Robertson K, Logan P, Conroy S, et al. Thinking fallstaking action: A guide to action for falls prevention. Br J Comm Nursing 2010; 15: 406-410.
    • 22. Close JCT. Interdisciplinary practice in the prevention of falls-a review of working models of care. Age Ageing 2001; 30: 8-12.
    • 23. Campbell MK, Piaggio G and Elbourne DR. Consort 2010 statement: extension to cluster randomised trials: Research Methods and Reporting. BMJ 2012; 345: e5661.
    • 24. Clark TS and Linzer DA. Should I use fixed or random effects? Political Sci Res Methods 2015; 3: 399-408.
    • 25. ENRICH Enabling Research In Care Homes. Practical advice to recruit care homes, 2014. http://www.enrich. nihr.ac.uk/research-community/practical-advice.html#. VRU8NOErhU4 (accessed January 2015).
    • 26. LaingBuisson. Care of the Elderly People Market Survey, 2009.
    • 27. Ganz DA, Bao Y, Shekelle PG and Rubenstein LZ. WIll my patient fall? JAMA 2007; 297: 77-86.
    • 28. Whitney J, Close JCT, Jackson SHD and Lord SR. Understanding risk of falls in people with cognitive impairment living in residential care. J Am Med Directors Assoc 2012; 13: 535-540.
    • 29. Kirkwood B and Sterne J. Essential medical statistics, Second edition. Blackwell Sci 2003: 420-421.
    • 30. Kinley J, Stone L, Dewey M, et al. The effect of using high facilitation when implementing the Gold Standards Framework in Care Homes programme: A cluster randomised controlled trial. Palliative Med 2014; 28:1099 -1109.
    • 31. Sahota O, Drummond A, Kendrick D, et al. REFINE (REducing Falls in In-patieNt Elderly) using bed and bedside chair pressure sensors linked to radio-pagers in acute hospital care: A randomised controlled trial. Age Ageing 2014; 43: 247-253.
    • 32. Walker GM, Logan PA, Gordon AL, Conroy S, Armstrong S, Robertson K, Ward M, Frowd N, Darby J, Arnold G and Gladman JRF. Are Accelerometers a useful way to measure activity in care home residents? Age Ageing 2015; 44 (suppl 1). DOI 10.1093/ageing/afv032.02.
    • 33. Davison J, Bond J, Dawson P, Steen IN and Kenny RA. Patients with recurrent falls attending Accident & Emergency benefit from multifactorial intervention-a randomised controlled trial. Age Ageing 2005; 34: 162-168.
    • 34. Jepson P, Sands G, Beswick AD, Davis ET, Blom AW and Sackley CM. A feasibility randomised controlled trial of pre-operative occupational therapy to optimise recovery for patients undergoing primary total hip replacement for osteoarthritis (PROOF-THR). Clin Rehabil 2016; 30(2): 156-166.
    • 35. Rapp K, Becker C, Lamb SE, Icks A and Klenk J. Hip fractures in institutionalized elderly people: Incidence rates and excess mortality. J Bone Mineral Res 2008; 23: 1825-1831.
    • 36. Nazir A, Unroe K, Tegeler M, Khan B, Azar J and Boustani M. Systematic review of interdisciplinary interventions in nursing homes. J Am Med Directors Assoc 2013; 14: 471-478.
    • 37. Testad I, Mikkelsen A, Ballard C and Aarsland D. Health and well-being in care staff and their relations to organizational and psychosocial factors, care staff and resident factors in nursing homes. Int J Geriatric Psychiatry 2009; 25: 789-797.
    • 38. McDonnell A, Dearden B and Richens A. Staff training in the management of violence and aggression: 1-Setting up a training system. J Br Inst Mental Handicap (APEX) 1991; 19: 73-76.
    • 39. Davies SL, Goodman C, Bunn F, et al. A systematic review of integrated working between care homes and health care services. BMC Health Services Res 2011; 11: 320.
    • 40. Oliver D, Hopper A and Seed P. Do hospital fall prevention programs work? A systematic review. J Am Geriatric Soc 2000; 48: 1679-1689.
    • 41. Siemonsma P and Walker M. Practical guidelines for independent assessment in randomized controlled trials (RCTs) of rehabilitation. Clin Rehabil 1997; 11: 273-279.
  • No related research data.
  • No similar publications.

Share - Bookmark

Cite this article