LOGIN TO YOUR ACCOUNT

Username
Password
Remember Me
Or use your Academic/Social account:

CREATE AN ACCOUNT

Or use your Academic/Social account:

Congratulations!

You have just completed your registration at OpenAire.

Before you can login to the site, you will need to activate your account. An e-mail will be sent to you with the proper instructions.

Important!

Please note that this site is currently undergoing Beta testing.
Any new content you create is not guaranteed to be present to the final version of the site upon release.

Thank you for your patience,
OpenAire Dev Team.

Close This Message

CREATE AN ACCOUNT

Name:
Username:
Password:
Verify Password:
E-mail:
Verify E-mail:
*All Fields Are Required.
Please Verify You Are Human:
fbtwitterlinkedinvimeoflicker grey 14rssslideshare1
Publisher: AIP
Languages: English
Types: Unknown
Subjects: TA
Identifiers:doi:10.1063/1.3179898
To improve understanding of the mechanical behavior of granular materials it is important to be able to quantify the relative arrangement of the grains, i.e. the fabric. This can be done, for example, by measuring the orientations of the particles (e.g. the long axis orientation) or by considering the orientations of the vectors normal to each grain‐grain contact. In two dimensional (2D) analyses this information can be obtained by digital image analysis of images of thin sections obtained from an optical microscope. While such data is useful, granular materials of engineering interest are three dimensional (3D) materials and quantification of the 3D fabric is necessary. Micro Computed‐Tomography (μCT) together with 3D image analysis has emerged as a promising technique for obtaining the 3D data required. This paper aims to highlight the challenges associated with using image analysis to provide quantitative information on fabric. While automated image segmentation has proved to produce reasonable results in some cases, it is sometimes less successful when dealing with highly irregular and angular soil grains. This paper evaluates the effectiveness of 2D and 3D segmentation techniques that rely on the watershed segmentation algorithm. The primary material considered is Reigate Silver Sand, a natural quartzitic sand with grain diameters in the range of 150–300 μm. While the sand considered is primarily of interest to geotechnical engineers, the results of this study will be of interest to anyone seeking to quantify granular material fabric using either 2D microscopy data or μCT 3D data sets.
  • The results below are discovered through our pilot algorithms. Let us know how we are doing!

    • 1. T. Cuccovillo and M. R. Coop, Géotechnique 49, 6, pp. 741-760 (1999)
    • 2. A. Cresswell and W. Powrie, Géotechnique 54, 2, pp. 107-115 (2004)
    • 3. C. Thornton, Géotechnique 50, 1, pp. 43-53 (2000)
    • 4. L. Cui and C. O'Sullivan Géotechnique 56, 7, pp. 455- 468 (2006)
    • 5. X. Yang, “3D Characterization of inherent and induced sand microstructure”, Ph.D. Thesis, Georgia Tech (2005)
    • 6. J. C. Russ, “The Image Processing Handbook” CRC Press pp. 489-496 (2007)
    • 7. P. Danielsson, “Euclidean Distance Mapping” Comp. Graphics Image Process 14, pp. 227-248 (1980)
    • 8. L. Ibanez, W. Schroeder, L. Ng and J. Cates, “The Itk software guide”. 2nd ed. pp. 194-207 and 524-530 (2005)
    • 9. L. Vincent and P. Soille, IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell. 13, pp. 583-598 (1991)
    • 10. A. P. Mangan and R. T. Whitaker, IEEE Trans. Vis. Computer Graphics 5, 4 pp. 308-21 (1999)
    • 11. Mathworks, Image Processing Toolbox 7.0 (2004)
    • 12. J. E. Cates, R. T. Whitaker and G. M. Jones Medical Image Analysis 9 pp. 566-578 (2005)
    • 13. P. Soille, “Morphological Image Analysis” Springer pp. 267-290 (2003)
    • 14. J. C. Russ (private communication)
  • No related research data.
  • No similar publications.

Share - Bookmark

Download from

Cite this article