Remember Me
Or use your Academic/Social account:


Or use your Academic/Social account:


You have just completed your registration at OpenAire.

Before you can login to the site, you will need to activate your account. An e-mail will be sent to you with the proper instructions.


Please note that this site is currently undergoing Beta testing.
Any new content you create is not guaranteed to be present to the final version of the site upon release.

Thank you for your patience,
OpenAire Dev Team.

Close This Message


Verify Password:
Verify E-mail:
*All Fields Are Required.
Please Verify You Are Human:
fbtwitterlinkedinvimeoflicker grey 14rssslideshare1
Ietcu-Fairclough, Isabela (2008)
Publisher: John Benjamins
Languages: English
Types: Article
In this paper I analyse differences in the legitimation strategies used by and on behalf of the two presidential candidates in the elections of December 2004 in Romania, using a combination of Critical Discourse Analysis and pragma-dialectics. These differences are seen to lie primarily in the varieties of populist discourse that were drawn upon in the construction of legitimizing arguments for both candidates: a paternalist type vs. a radical, anti-political type of populism. I relate the success of the latter type to more effective strategic maneuvering in argumentation, part of more effective branding strategies in general, but also to existing types of political culture amongst the electorate and to social, economic circumstances. In CDA terms, I discuss the "Băsescu brand" as involving choices at the level of discourse, genre and style; in pragma-dialectical terms, I view its success as partly the effect of successful strategic maneuvering. I also place the success of this brand within the Romanian context at the end of 2004, where often questionable populist electoral messages were perceived as reasonable and acceptable, as fitting adjustments to the situation and even as means of optimizing the deliberative situation of the electorate.
  • The results below are discovered through our pilot algorithms. Let us know how we are doing!

    • Almond, Gabriel & Verba, Sidney. 1996/1963. Cultura Civică. Atitudini politice şi democraţie în cinci naţiuni. Budapest: CEU Press/ Bucureşti: Editura Du Style.
    • Bowell, Tracy & Kemp, Gary 2002. Critical Thinking: A Concise Guide. London and New York: Routledge.
    • Eemeren, Frans. H. van & Houtlosser, Pete.r 2002. “Strategic maneuvering: Maintaining a delicate balance.” In Dialectic and Rhetoric. The Warp and Woof of Argumentation Analysis, Frans. H. van Eemeren and Peter Houtlosser (eds), 131-159, Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
    • Eemeren, Frans H. van & Grootendorst, Rob. 1992. Argumentation, Communication and Fallacies. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
    • Eemeren, Frans H. van & Grootendorst, Rob. 2004. A Systematic Theory of Argumentation. The pragma-dialectical approach. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    • Fairclough, Norman. 1989. Language and Power. London: Longman.
    • Fairclough, Norman. 1992. Discourse and Social Change. Cambridge: Polity Press.
    • Fairclough, Norman. 2000. New Labour, New Language. London: Routledge.
    • Jagers, Jan & Walgrave, Stefaan. 2007. “Populism as political communication style. An empirical study of political parties' discourse in Belgium.” European Journal of Political Research, 46 (3): 319-345, Oxford: Blackwell Publishing.
    • Kratzer, Angelika. 1991. “Modality.” In Semantics: An International Handbook of Contemporary Research, Arnim Von Stechow and Dieter Wunderlich (eds), 639-650. Berlin and New York: Walter de Gruyter.
    • Mudde, Cas. 2004. “The populist zeitgeist.” Government and Opposition 39 (4): 541- 563. Oxford: Blackwell Publishing.
    • Mungiu-Pippidi, Alina. 2002 Politica după communism. Bucureşti: Humanitas.
    • Newman, Bruce. 1999. The Mass Marketing of Politics: Democracy in an Age of Manufactured Images. London: Sage.
    • Reisigl, Martin. 2007. “The dynamics of right-wing populist argumentation in Austria.” Proceedings of the Sixth International Conference on Argumentation, 1127:1134. Amsterdam: Sic Sat.
    • Richardson, John E. 2007. Analysing Newspapers. An Approach from Critical Discourse Analysis. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
    • Wiles, Peter. 1969. “Populism. A syndrome, not a doctrine.” In Populism. Its Meaning and Characteristics, Ghiţă Ionescu & Ernest Gellner, 166-179. London: Weidenfeld & Nicholson.
    • Wodak, Ruth, Rudolph de Cillia, Martin Reisigl & Karin Liebhart. 1999. The Discursive Construction of Austrian National Identity. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.
  • No related research data.
  • Discovered through pilot similarity algorithms. Send us your feedback.

Share - Bookmark

Cite this article