LOGIN TO YOUR ACCOUNT

Username
Password
Remember Me
Or use your Academic/Social account:

CREATE AN ACCOUNT

Or use your Academic/Social account:

Congratulations!

You have just completed your registration at OpenAire.

Before you can login to the site, you will need to activate your account. An e-mail will be sent to you with the proper instructions.

Important!

Please note that this site is currently undergoing Beta testing.
Any new content you create is not guaranteed to be present to the final version of the site upon release.

Thank you for your patience,
OpenAire Dev Team.

Close This Message

CREATE AN ACCOUNT

Name:
Username:
Password:
Verify Password:
E-mail:
Verify E-mail:
*All Fields Are Required.
Please Verify You Are Human:
fbtwitterlinkedinvimeoflicker grey 14rssslideshare1
S. Melia (2015)
Publisher: Ecologica
Languages: English
Types: Article
Subjects:
A growing body of literature aimed at policymakers as well as researchers criticises the quality of much transport research and advocates a methodological hierarchy with randomised controlled trials at the top as the solution. This article critically analyses the justification for such hierarchies, in the context of voluntary travel behaviour change programmes, whose effectiveness has been called into question. It proposes 5 criteria for the valid application of experimental methods, which suggest that such methods are only relevant to a limited range of transport research questions. It finds no valid justification for a methodological hierarchy and concludes that attempting to apply such a hierarchy would generate misleading advice for policy makers.
  • The results below are discovered through our pilot algorithms. Let us know how we are doing!

    • Bamberg, S. (2003) How does environmental concern influence specific environ - mentally related behaviors? A new answer to an old question. Journal of Environmental Psychology. 23 (1), pp. 21-32.
    • Bonsall, P.W. (2009) Do we know whether personal travel planning really works? Transport Policy. 16 (6), pp. 306-314.
    • (2014) Evaluating the impacts of new walking and cycling infrastructure on carbon dioxide emissions from motorized travel: A controlled longitudinal study. Applied Energy. 128 (0), pp. 284-295.
    • Chatterjee, K. (2009) A comparative evaluation of large-scale personal travel planning projects in England. Transport Policy.
    • 16 (6), pp. 293-305.
    • Chatterjee, K. and Hardin, J. (2011) The contribution of walking and cycling to achieving recommended levels of physical activity. In: Anon. (2011) 43rd Conference of the Universities Transport Study Group [online]. January.
    • DfT, (2012) TAG UNIT 3.10.6 Modelling Smarter Choices. www.dft.gov.uk/webtag: Department of Transport.
    • Flyvbjerg, B. (2001) Making Social Science Matter : Why Social Inquiry Fails and how it can Succeed again. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    • Goodwin, P. (2011) Can Travel's Random Elements be Controlled? Local Transport Today. 564 .
    • Graham-Rowe, E., Skippon, S., Gardner, B. and Abraham, C. (2011) Can we reduce car use and, if so, how? A review of available evidence. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice. 45 (5), pp.
    • Harland, G. (1993) Cycle Routes.
    • Harrison, J. (2001) Planning for more cycling: the York experience bucks the trend. World Transport Policy & Practice. 7 (3), pp. 21-27.
    • Jadad, A.R. and Enkin, M. (2007) Randomized Controlled Trials : Questions, Answers, and Musings [online]. 2nd ed. Oxford: Blackwell.
    • ONS (2009) 2001 Census. Available from: www.nomisweb.gov.uk .
    • Pucher, J., Dill, J. and Handy, S. (2010) Infrastructure, programs, and policies to increase bicycling: An international review.
    • Preventive Medicine. 50, Supplement (0), pp. S106-S125.
    • Rowland, D., DiGuiseppi, C., Gross, M., Afolabi, E. and Roberts, I. (2003) Randomised controlled trial of site specific advice on school travel patterns. Archives of Disease in Childhood. 88 (1), pp. 8-11.
    • (2010) The Effects of Smarter Choice Programmes in the Sustainable Travel Towns [online]. London: Dept. for Transport.
    • Tavistock Institute and AECOM (2010) Guidance for Transport Impact Evaluations : Choosing an Evaluation Approach to Achieve Better Attribution [online]. London: Department for Transport.
    • T erry, F. (2000) Transport: Beyond Predict and Provide. In: Davies, H.T.O., Nutley, S.
    • and Smith, P., eds. (2000) What Works? : Evidence-Based Policy and Practice in Public Services [online]. Bristol: The Policy Press, pp. 187-206.
  • No related research data.
  • No similar publications.

Share - Bookmark

Download from

Cite this article