LOGIN TO YOUR ACCOUNT

Username
Password
Remember Me
Or use your Academic/Social account:

CREATE AN ACCOUNT

Or use your Academic/Social account:

Congratulations!

You have just completed your registration at OpenAire.

Before you can login to the site, you will need to activate your account. An e-mail will be sent to you with the proper instructions.

Important!

Please note that this site is currently undergoing Beta testing.
Any new content you create is not guaranteed to be present to the final version of the site upon release.

Thank you for your patience,
OpenAire Dev Team.

Close This Message

CREATE AN ACCOUNT

Name:
Username:
Password:
Verify Password:
E-mail:
Verify E-mail:
*All Fields Are Required.
Please Verify You Are Human:
fbtwitterlinkedinvimeoflicker grey 14rssslideshare1
Languages: English
Types: Doctoral thesis
Subjects:
This thesis suggests a cultural logic of financialisation in terms of (re)presentation of information and (re)configuration of temporality, both of which are critically undertaken and regulated by financial narrative. This narrative functions, following Bourdieu, as “the sign of wealth” in our times. It is time for cultural theorists and activists to approach finance as a set of epistemic cultural processes beyond the economic, which modulates epistemological and ontological contexts, affecting actors’ cognition and behavior in value production and realisation. Financialisation is supported and maintained by narrative intervention in valorising the onto-phenomenological level of the economic. From this perspective, financialisation is suggested as a disinformation campaign, through which the cognitive dissonance of the financial mechanism is effectively contained, concealing its damaging effects and thus valorising the financial mechanism. It implements an intensification of the transactional orientation as the legitimate mode of value production and circulation. Sustaining and amplifying the transactional orientation of investment banking among the actors in the financial markets, the financial system conceals cognitive dissonance through its operativity of information. It works towards the construction of a new financial reality, stimulating belief and guiding action⎯without which financial integrity, credit relations, and transactional orientation could not be sustained.\ud \ud Observing the contemporary culture-finance relationship from the perspective of value politics under financial capitalism, this thesis analyses specific aspects of homology between culture and finance from the perspective of the cultural logic of financial narrative. This is seen as a frame of value transference and a device of activation as well as of domination. Exploring the possibilities of a cultural theory of value, this project, first of all, focuses upon the question of value and the actual process of value formation associated with operativity and performativity of narrative. Narrative is analysed as the cognitive operation constitutive of financial narrative politics for value transference in the discourse of financial crisis, which has been, as this thesis upholds and examines, systematically operated throughout the Korean financial crisis. It mainly revisits the value theories and narrative analyses of Simmel, Marx, Ricoeur, Jameson, and Genette to articulate an economic theory of value in the cultural politics of narrative. Following Ricoeur, it sees this as a mechanism of value transference, and it is here correlated with the financial doctrine of entanglement and contagion. Through a narrative, wherein utterances and statements around a primal event, or crisis, perform as the collective operativity of information, a value is constructed and transferred to inform and motivate actors. Narrative structure, from which the nexuses of intentionalities of the financial system are formulated and transmitted, is proposed as a meta-frame of cultural valorisation. It valorises economic value for the (re)production of dominant financial value, without which any unprecedented application of ‘methodology,’ such as a ‘shock doctrine,’ of economic prescription cannot be legitimised and extrapolated.\ud \ud This project begins with the argument in Chapter 2 that narrative exploits uncertainty as a resource for performativity, and thus necessitates a new standard, thereby regulating and activating heterogeneous actors in the markets. A financial crisis is the crucial point of narrativity in the constitution of a legitimate guiding structure, exploiting uncertainty in order to manage risk⎯ thus producing a narrative as a frame of self-reference. The narrative identifies the new main value by effectively performing the uncertainty of a financial crisis. In this regard, the chapter proposes that the necessity of negating (or guaranteeing) the fundamental contradiction, or “the self-abolishing contradiction,” bolstered by the sheer size of the entanglement and contagion in finance capitalism, is authenticated and initiated by a preliminary cultural operation of a discursive approach to the crisis. The discourse is not a randomly disseminated rhetoric, but is presented as a narrative in which temporal reconfiguration and sequences of action are carefully guided to represent the main event as a source of cognition and action for contextual control; a certain sequence of events is thereby thematised and anticipated through the interpretation of the event in question, with clear intentions by the main financial narrator. Narrative opens a performative field of objectification in which the power relationship between the main narrator and the object, the narratee, is established and coordinated. The narrative emphasis in a collapse, for instance, one that is yet to come, grounds the operativity and performativity through which actors are informed and motivated, while implementing and legitimising the necessary official description.\ud \ud Articulating the intentions of the system, and its employment of capitalistically reconfigured temporality, as well as its representation of information into narrative, Chapter 3 suggests that narrative is the objectifying field of value and value-transference, in which the textuality of everyday narrative is produced to direct actors as the ushering force of the main value. Proposing value as a guiding force of cognition and action, the chapter closely inquires into the value-forming process, arguing that narrative process is an inevitable
  • The results below are discovered through our pilot algorithms. Let us know how we are doing!

    • _______ (1998) ‗Economies of Value', in Multicultural States: Rethinking Difference and Identity ed. by David Bennett, London: Routledge.
    • Frye, N. (1957) The Anatomy of Criticism, Princeton: Princeton University Press.
    • _______ (1976) The Secular Scripture, Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
    • Gadamer, H-G. (1975) Truth and Method, (tr. by G. Barden and J. Cumming) New York: Seabury.
    • Geisst Charles R. (1995) Investment Banking in the Financial System, Prentice-Hall Inc.
    • Genette. G. (1980) Narrative Discourse, tr. by Jane E. Lewin, Ithaca: Cornell University Press.
    • Germain, D. (1997) The International Organization of Credit: States and Global Finance in the World-Economy, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    • Goldstein, M. (1998) The Asian Financial Crisis: Causes, Cures and Systematic Implications, Peterson Institute.
    • Goux J.-J. (1990) Symbolic Economies: After Marx and Freud, tr. by Jennifer Curtiss Gage, Ithaca: Cornell University Press.
    • Jauss, H. R. (1982) Toward an Aesthetic of Reception and Literary Hermeneutics, tr. by Michael Shaw, Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
    • Kim D.-J. and B. Kogut. (1996) ‗Technological Platforms and Diversification,' Organization Science 7 (3).
    • Knorr Cetina, K. (1981) The Manufacture of Knowledge: An Essay on the Constructivist and Contextual Nature of Science, Oxford: Pergamon.
    • ______________ (1999) Epistemic Cultures: How the Sciences Makes Knowledge, Harvard University Press.
    • ______________ and Bruegger, U. (2002) ‗Global Microstructures: The Virtual Societies of Financial Markets', American Journal of Sociology 107: 905-950.
    • ______________ and Preda, A. (2004) ‗How are Global Markets Global?' in The Sociology of Financial Markets, Oxford University Press.
    • ___________________________ (2004) ‗Traders' Engagement with Markets: A Postsocial Relationship' in The Blackwell Cultural Economy Reader, Ash Amin and Nigel Thrift (eds.) London: Blackwell.
    • Kohli, A., Moon, C., and Sørensen, G. (2003) State, Market and Just Growth: Development in Twenty-Fist Century, United Nations University Press.
    • Kosack, S., Ranis, G., and Vreeland, J. R. (2006) Globalization and the Nation State: The Impact of the IMF and the World Bank, Routledge.
    • Kritzman, L. D. (ed.) (1988) Michel Foucault: Politics, Philosophy, Culture, London: Routledge.
    • Krugman, P. (1994) ‗LDC Debt Policy,' in American Economic Policy in 1980s, ed. by Martin S. Feldstein et al., Chicago University Press.
    • ___________ (1998) ‗What happened to Asia', Mimeographed, MIT.
    • Labov, W. (1994) Principles of Linguistic Changes vol.I, London: Wiley Blackwell.
    • Laclau, E. and Mouffe, C. (1985) Hegemony and Social Strategy, London: Verso.
    • Langley, P. (2002) World Financial Orders: An Historical International Political Economy, London: Routledge.
    • Lukács, G. (1921) History and Class Consciousness, London: Merlin, 1971.
    • Luxembourg, R. (2003) The Accumulation of Capital, (tr. Schwarzschild, A.) Routledge.
    • Lyotard, J. (1984) The Postmodern Condition: A Report on Knowledge, tr. by Geoff Bennington and Brian Massumi (Manchester: Manchester University Press)
    • MacKenzie, D. (2002) ‗The Imagined Market,' London Review of Books, Oct 21.
    • ____________ (2004) ‗Physics and Finance', in The Blackwell Cultural Economy Reader, eds. by Ash Amin and Nigel Thrift, London: Blackwell
    • ____________ (2008) An Engine, Not a Camera, The IMT Press.
    • ____________ and Millo, Y. (2003) ‗Negotiating a Market, Performing Theory: The Historical Sociology of a Financial Derivatives Exchange', American Journal of Sociology 109(1): 107- 46.
    • ____________ and Muniesa, F. AND Siu, L. (2007) Do Economists Make Markets?: On the Performativity of Economics, Princeton: Princeton University Press.
    • McRobbie, A. (1994) Postmodernism and the Popular Culture, London: Routledge.
    • Mandel, E. (1981) ‗Introduction,' Capital vol. 3 by Karl Marx (tr. David Fernbach), London: Penguin.
    • Marx, K. (1977) Selected Writings, ed. D. McLellan, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
    • _______ (1975) The Pelican Marx Library, Harmondsworth: Penguin.
    • _______ and Engels, F. (1975) Collected Works, London: Lawrence & Wishart.
    • _______ (1843) On the Jewish Question in L. Coletti (ed.) Early Writings, Harmondsworth: Penguin, 1975, 211-42.
    • _______ (1844) The Paris Manuscripts in L. Coletti (ed.) Early Writings, Harmondsworth: Penguin, 1975, 279-400.
    • _______ and Engels, F. (1845) The Holy Family, in Collected Works, London: Lawrence & Wishart, 1975, vol. 4, 15-211
    • _______ (1845) Theses on Feuerbach tr. by R. Livingston and G. Benton and ed. by L. Coletti in Early Writings, Harmondsworth: Penguin, 1975, 421-3.
    • _______ and Engels, F. (1845-6) The German Ideology, London: Lawrence & Wishart, 1970.
    • _______ and Engels, F. (1848) The Communist Manifesto, in D. Fernbach (ed.) The Revolutions of 1848, Harmondsworth: Penguin, 1973, 62-98.
    • _______ (1867) Das Kapital, trans. B. Foukes, Capital, Harmondsworth: Penguin, 1977.
    • _______ (1978) ‗Economic and philosophic manuscripts of 1844', The Marx-Engels reader, ed. Robert C. Tucker, New York: W.W.Norton & Company.
    • _______ (1990) Capital vol. I, trans., Ben Fowkes, London: Penguin.
    • _______ (1992) Capital vol. II, trans. David Fernbach, London: Penguin.
    • _______ (1981) Capital vol. III, trans. David Fernbach, London: Penguin.
    • _______ (1875) The Critique of the Gotha Programme, in D. Fernbach (ed.) The First International and After, 1973.
    • McCloskey, D. (1983) ‗The Rhetoric of Economics,' Journal of Economic Literature 31
    • _____________ (1984) ‗The Literary Character of Economics,' Daedalus 113. 3, Summer.
    • _____________ (1988) ‗The Consequences of Rhetoric,' in The Consequences of Rhetoric. eds. by Klamer, et al. Cambridge University Press.
    • _____________ (1988) ‗Towards a Rhetoric of Economics,' in The Boundaries of Economics, Murphy Institute Studies in Political Economy. (G. C. Winston and R. F. Teichgraeber III, eds.) Cambridge University Press.
    • _____________ & Klamer A. (1989) ‗The Rhetoric of Disagreement,' Rethinking Marxism 2. Fall.
    • _____________ (1990) ‗Storytelling in Economics,' in Narrative in Culture. eds. by Christopher Nash and Martin Warner, Routledge: London.
    • _____________ (1992) ‗The Rhetoric of Finance,' for The New Palgrave Dictionary of Money and Finance.
    • _____________ (1995) ‗Metaphors Economists Live By,' Social Research 62. 2. Summer. Minneapolis: Univ. Minnesota press.
    • ________ and Hardt, Michael (2000) Empire, Massachusetts: Harvard Univ Press.
    • Nelson, A. (1999) Marx‟s Concept of Money: The God of Commodities, Routledge.
    • Nelson, C. and Grossberg, L. (eds) (1988) Marxism and the Interpretation of Culture, London: Macmillan.
    • Orléan, A. (1989) ‗Mimetic Contagion and Speculative Bubbles,' Theory and Decision, 27:1/2
    • Parenteau, R. W. (2005) ‗The Late 1990s' US Bubble: Financialization in the Extreme,' in Financialization and the World Economy, ed. by Gerald A. Epstein, Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
    • Said, E. W., (1995) Orientalism, London: Penguin Books, 1978.
    • __________ (1994) Culture and Imperialism, London: Vintage.
  • No related research data.
  • No similar publications.

Share - Bookmark

Cite this article