The results below are discovered through our pilot algorithms. Let us know how we are doing!

• 1. Domencich, T.A. and McFadden, D. Urban Travel Demand: A Behavioral Analysis. American Elsevier, New York, 1975.
• 2. Ben-Akiva, M. E. and S.R. Lerman, Discrete Choice Analysis: Theory and Application to Travel Demand, MIT Press, Cambridge, Mass, USA, 1985.
• 3. Cascetta, E. Transportation Systems Engineering: Theory and Methods. Applied Optimization Series, 49. Norwell, MA: Kluwer Academic Publishers, 2001.
• 4. Searle, J. Minds, brains and programs. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 3 (3), pp. 417-457, 1980.
• 5. Avineri, E. On the use and potential of behavioural economics from the perspective of transport and climate change. Journal of Transport Geography (in press), 2012.
• 6. Tversky, A. and Kahneman, D. Judgment under uncertainty: Heuristics and biases. Science, 185, 1124-1131, 1974.
• 7. Kahneman, D. and Tversky, A. Prospect Theory: An analysis of decision under risk. Econometrica 47(2), 263-291, 1979.
• 8. Tversky, A. and D. Kahneman. Advances in prospect theory: Cumulative representation of uncertainty, Journal of Risk and Uncertainty, vol. 9, pp. 195-230, 1992.
• 9. Ariely, D. Predictably Irrational: The Hidden Forces the Shape our Decisions. Harper-Collins, New York, 2008.
• 10. Thaler, R. and Sunstein, C.R. Nudge: Improving Decisions about Health, Wealth and Happiness. Yale University Press, New Haven, CT, 2008.
view all 54
11. Avineri, E. and Prashker, J.N. Violations of Expected Utility Theory in Route-Choice Stated Preferences: The Certainty Effect and Inflating of Small Probabilities. Transportation Research Record 1894, 222-229, 2004.
12. Avineri, E. and Prashker, J.N. Sensitivity to travel time variability: travelers' learning perspective. Transportation Research Part C 13(2), 157-183, 2005.
13. van de Kaa, E.J. Extended Prospect Theory. Findings on Choice Behaviour from Economics and the Behavioural Sciences and their Relevance for Travel Behaviour T2008/11, TRAIL Thesis Series, the Netherlands, 2008.
14. Avineri, E. and Chorus, C. Editorial: Recent developments in prospect theory-based travel behavior research. European Journal of Transport and Infrastructure Research, 10(4), 293-298, 2010.
15. Avineri, E. The fuzzy meaning of reference-based perceptions in travel choice modeling, Transportation Research Board (TRB) 88th Annual Meeting, January, Washington D.C., USA, 2009.
16. Kikuchi, S. Fuzzy Sets Theory Approach to Transportation Problems. Artificial Intelligence in Transportation: Information for Application, Transportation Research Circular E-C113, Artifical Intelligence and Advanced Computing Applications Committee, TRB, National Research Council, Washington, D.C., pp. 33-48, 2007.
17. Teodorović, D. and S. Kikuchi, Transportation route choice model using fuzzy inference technique, Proceedings of ISUMA '90, The First International Symposium on Uncertainty Modeling and Analysis, IEEE Computer Society Press, College Park, Maryland, pp. 140-145, 1990.
18. Teodorović, D. and S. Kikuchi, Transportation route choice model using fuzzy inference technique, in: B.M. Ayyub (Ed.), Proceedings of the 1st International Symposium on Uncertainty Modeling and Analysis, IEEE Computer Press, Los Alamitos, CA, USA, pp. 140-145, 1991.
19. Lotan, T. and Koutsopoulos, H.N. Models for route choice behavior in the presence of information using concepts from fuzzy set theory and approximate reasoning, Transportation, Vol. 20, pp. 129- 155, 1993.
20. Lotan, T. Koutsopoulos, H.N. and Yang, Q. A driving simulator and its application for modeling route choice in the presence of information, Transportation Research Part C: Emerging Technologies, Vol. 2, Issue 2, pp. 91-107, 1994.
21. Henn, V., Fuzzy route choice model for traffic assignment, Fuzzy Sets and Systems, Vol. 116, No. 1, pp. 77-101, 2000.
22. Kosko, B. (1997), Fuzzy Engineering, Prentice Hall.
23. Wardrop, J.G. Some theoretical aspects of road traffic research. Proc. Inst. Civil Engineers, Part II. 1 325-378, 1952.
24. Zhao, Z. The ε-equilibrium in transportation networks. Fuzzy Sets and Systems, 68, 195-202, 1994.
25. Wang, H.-F., and Liao, H.-L. User equilibrium in traffic assignment problem with fuzzy N-A incidence matrix. Fuzzy Sets and Systems, 107(3), 245-253, 1999.
26. Teodorovic, D. and Pavkovic, G. The fuzzy set theory approach to the vehicle routing problem when demand at nodes is uncertain. Fuzzy Sets and Systems 82, 307-317, 1996.
27. Cantarella, G.E., and V. Fedele, Fuzzy utility models for analysing mode choice behaviour, European Transport Conference, 2003.
28. Sayed, T. and Razavi, A. Comparison of neural and conventional approaches to mode choice analysis, Journal of Computing in Civil Engineering, Vol. 14 (1), 23-30, 2000.
29. Olaru, D. and B. Smith, Applying neural networks to the interaction between land-use and transportation networks: a comparison with multivariate techniques. Decision Making in Urban & Civil Engineering, Proceedings of the 3rd International Conference, SOAS - London, UK, pp. 343- 350, 2002.
30. Dell'Orco, M., Ottomanelli M. and Sassanelli D., Modeling uncertainty in parking choice behavior. 82nd Annual Meeting of the Transportation Research Board, TRB, National Research Council, Washington D.C., 2003.
31. Ishak, S. and Trifiro, F. Neural networks. Artificial Intelligence in Transportation: Information for Application, Transportation Research Circular E-C113, Artifical Intelligence and Advanced Computing Applications Committee, TRB, National Research Council, Washington, D.C., pp. 17-30, 2007.
32. Hunt, J.G. and G.D. Lyons, Aspects of the application of artificial neural networks to model driver decisions. Proc Int Conf Neural Network Applications in Transport, VTT, Finland, pp. 15-34, 1995.
33. Jang, J.-S.R., ANFIS: Adaptive-Network-based Fuzzy Inference Systems, IEEE Trans. on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics, vol. 23, pp. 665-685, 1993.
34. Vythoulkas, P.C., An approach to travel behavior based on the concepts of fuzzy logic and neural networks. In: Proceedings of Seminar G on Transportation Planning Methods, The 22nd PTRC Transport Forum, Education and Research Services, London, UK, pp. 189-205, 1994.
35. Reggiani A. and Tritapepe O., Neural networks and logit models applied to commuters' mobility in the Metropolitan area of Milan. In: V. Himanen, P. Nijkamp and A. Reggiani, Editors, Neural networks in transport systems, Ashgate, Brookfield, 1998.
36. Nijkamp P., Reggiani A. and Tritapepe T., Modelling inter-urban transport flows in Italy: a comparison between neural network analysis and logit analysis, Transport. Res. 4C, pp. 323-338, 1996.
37. Schintler L.A. and Olurotimi O., Neural networks as adaptive logit models. In: V. Himanen, P. Nijkamp and A. Reggiani, Editors, Neural networks in transport systems, Ashgate, Brookfield, 1998.
38. Shmueli, D. Salomon I. and Shefer D., Neural network analysis of travel behavior: evaluating tools for prediction, Transportation Research C, 4, pp. 151-166, 1996.
39. Shmueli D., Applications of neural networks in transportation planning, Progr. Plan. 50, pp. 141-204, 1998.
40. Kim, D., Neural networks for trip generation model, Journal of the Eastern Asia Society for Transportation Studies, Vol. 4, No. 2, pp. 201-208, 2001.
41. Mozolin, M., Thill J.C and Lynn E., Trip distribution forecasting with multiplayer perceptron neural networks; a critical evaluation, Transportation. Research 34B, pp. 53-73, 2000.
42. Cantarella G.E. and de Luca S., Multilayer feedforward networks for transportation mode choice analysis: An analysis and a comparison with random utility models, Transportation Research C, 13 (2), pp. 121-155, 2005.
43. Celikoglu H.B., Application of radial basis function and generalized regression neural networks in non-linear utility function specification for travel mode choice modelling, Math Comput Model 44 (7-8), pp. 640-658, 2006.
44. de Luca S. and Cantarella G.E. Validation and Comparison of Choice Models. In: Travel demand management and road user pricing: success, failure and feasibility (eds.: W. Saleh and G. Sammer), Ashgate, UK. pp. 37-58, 2009.
45. Sakai, A., S. Odagawa and Y. Masumoto, Development of Route Calculation by Genetic Algorithm, the Third Annual World Congress on Intelligent Transport Systems, Orlando, Florida, 1996.
46. Nakayama, S. and R. Kitamura, Route Choice Model with Inductive Learning, Transportation Research Record - Journal of the Transportation Research Board, No. 1725, TRB, National Research Council, Washington, D.C., 2000.
47. Nakayama, S., R. Kitamura and S. Fujii, Drivers' Route Choice Rules and Network Behavior: Do Drivers Become Rational and Homogeneous Through Leaning? IATBR 2000 conference, Sydney, Australia, 2000.
48. Pribyl, O. and Goulias, K.G. (2005). Simulation of daily activity patterns incorporating interactions within households: Algorithm overview and performance. Transportation Research Record, 1926, 135-141, 2005.
49. Stopher, P.R., and Metcalf H.M.A.. Household activities, life cycle, and role allocation tests on data sets from Boston and Salt Lake City. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, No. 1676, TRB, National Research Council, Washington, D.C., pp. 95-102, 1999.
50. Bowman, J.L., and Ben-Akiva M. Activity-based travel forecasting. In Activity-Based Travel Forecasting Conference, (L.J. Engelke, ed.), Texas Transportation Institute, Austin, pp. 3-36, 1997.
51. Nagel K. and Marchal, F. Computational methods for multiagent simulations of travel behavior. Presented at the 10th International Conference on Travel Behaviour Research, Lucerne, 2003.
52. Bernhardt, K.L.S. Agent-based modeling in transportation. Artificial Intelligence in Transportation: Information for Application, Transportation Research Circular E-C113, Artifical Intelligence and Advanced Computing Applications Committee, TRB, National Research Council, Washington, D.C., pp. 72-80, 2007.
53. Arentze, T. and Timmermans, H. Social networks, social interactions, and activity-travel behavior: A framework for microsimulation. Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design 35 (6), 1012- 1027, 2008.
54. Stephan, C.H., Mahalik, M., Veselka, T., and Conzelmann, G. Modeling the transition to a hydrogenbased personal transportation system. Workshop of Frontiers in Transportation: Social Interactions. Amsterdam, the Netherlands, 2007.