Remember Me
Or use your Academic/Social account:


Or use your Academic/Social account:


You have just completed your registration at OpenAire.

Before you can login to the site, you will need to activate your account. An e-mail will be sent to you with the proper instructions.


Please note that this site is currently undergoing Beta testing.
Any new content you create is not guaranteed to be present to the final version of the site upon release.

Thank you for your patience,
OpenAire Dev Team.

Close This Message


Verify Password:
Verify E-mail:
*All Fields Are Required.
Please Verify You Are Human:
fbtwitterlinkedinvimeoflicker grey 14rssslideshare1
Ritchie, Nick (2014)
Publisher: Article 36
Languages: English
Types: Other
  • The results below are discovered through our pilot algorithms. Let us know how we are doing!

    • 23 M. MccGwire, 'Is There a Future for Nuclear Weapons', International Affairs, 70: 2, 1004. pp.211-228.
    • 24 M. Quinlan, Thinking about Nuclear Weapons: Principles, Problems, Prospects (Oxford: Oxford University Press,2009), p.54.
    • 25 S. Sagan, The Limits of Safety: Organizations, Accidents, and Nuclear Weapons (Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1993).
    • 26 Defence Nuclear Environment and Safety Board, 2011 Assurance Report, 2011.
    • 27 Defence Safety and Environment Authority, Defence Nuclear Safety Regulators, 'Japanese Earthquake and Tsunami: Implications for the UK Defence Nuclear Programme', July 2012, p.14.
    • 28 House of Commons, Official Report, 2 November 2010, Col. 693W.
    • 29 Ministry of Defence, Information Commissioner's Office Case Reference FS50444068, 27 February 2013, requested by Peter Burt, Nuclear Information Service, UK.
    • 30 'US Nuclear submarine “within metres of disaster” off British coast: report', The Daily Telegraph, 21 June 2011.
    • 31 House of Commons, Official Report, 3 July 2012, Col. 627W.
    • 32 Health and Safety Executive, Office for Nuclear Regulation, 'Quarterly site report for Devonport Royal Dockyard (Devonport Royal Dockyard Ltd and HM Naval Base Devonport)', November 2012, pp.7-8.
    • 33 Ministry of Defence, Defence Equipment and Support, 'Summary and Forward Actions from HMNB Clyde's Annual Review of Safety (AROS) 2010', October 2010. Reported at R. Edwards, 'Clyde bases plagued by nuclear safety flaws, says the MoD', The Sunday Herald, 19 February 2012.
    • 34 R. Edwards, 'Revealed: The 22 Safety Shortfall's of Scotland's Nuclear Crane', The Sunday Herald, 3 April 2011.
    • 35 'Shiplift Facility Safety Case', Nuclear Site Safety Justification report, Ministry of Defence, January 2010, Part 5, p.5. Available at .
    • 36 Ibid, p.2.
    • 37 Defence Nuclear Environment and Safety Board, Annual Report 2012/13, Defence Nuclear Safety Regulator, 2012, p.6.
    • 38 Available at .
    • 39 Defence Nuclear Safety Regulator, 'Safety Regulators' Advice on the Selection of the Propulsion Plant in Support of the Future Deterrent: Review Note', DNSR/22/11/2, November 2009. Available at .
    • 40 Health and Safety Executive, Office for Nuclear Regulation, “Quarterly site report for AWE Aldermaston and Burghfield”, September 2012, p. 4. See Nuclear Information Service, “A45 Corrosion of 'Major Significance' Reveal FOIA Papers”, March 2013.
    • 41 Health and Safety Executive, Office for Nuclear Regulation, Chief Nuclear Inspectors Annual Report 2013, p.16.
    • 42 House of Commons, Official Report, 22 March 2009, Col. 10W.
    • 43 'AWE Fire Investigation: Key Findings and Company Response Document', AWE, June 2011.
    • 44 R. Edwards, 'Firefighters Criticize Nuclear Weapons Plant Following Serious Fire', The Guardian, 31 May 2011.
    • 47 Health and Safety Executive, HM Nuclear Installations Inspectorate, Site Inspection Report No. 2007/032, May 2007.
    • 48 R. Edwards, 'Nuclear Weapons Plant Should be Rebuilt', The New Scientist, No. 2622, 20 September 2007.
    • 49 Health and Safety Executive, HM Nuclear Installations Inspectorate, Unit 3b Division 3 Project Assessment Report No: 33/2006, 'Report to justify the Agreement to the implementation of the Trident modified disassembly process,Burghfield', 2006, p.4.
    • 50 Ibid., p.3.
    • 51 Health and Safety Executive, HM Nuclear Installations Inspectorate, Site Inspection Report No. 40/2006, p.3.
    • 52 'Nuclear Weapons Safety', Report of the Panel on Nuclear Weapons Safety of the House Armed Services Committee, (Drell Report) Committee Print No. 15, December 1990; R. Kidder, 'Report to Congress: Assessment of the Safety of US Nuclear Weapons and Related Nuclear Test Requirements', Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory, July 1991; J. Harvey and S. Michalowski, 'Nuclear Weapons Safety: The Case of Trident', Science and Global Security, 1994, Vo. 4, pp. 261-337.
    • 53 I. Bruce, 'Experts Sound Trident Safety Warning', The Sunday Herald, 29 October 1992. British American Security Information Council, 'Second Report on British Nuclear Weapons Safety: A Response to the Oxburgh Report', BASIC Report 92.4, 1992.
    • 54 Department of Defence, Defense Science Board, Task Force Report on Advanced Cyber Threat, January 2013, p.7.
    • 55 A. Sternstein, 'Officials Worry About Vulnerability of Global Nuclear Stockpile to Cyber Attack', Global Security Newswire, 14 March 2013. Available at .
    • 56 For the UK, see Greenpeace UK, 'Aldermaston - Inside the Citadel: An Investigation into Britain Nuclear Bomb Factory', 1993; J. Ainslie, 'The Safety of Trident - An Assessment of the Radiation Risks Associated with the UK Trident Programme', Scottish CND, February 1994; 'The Timebomb That Threatens Britain', The Observer, 24 October 1999.
    • 57 General G. L. Butler, Address to Canadian Peaceworkers, Ottawa, 11 March 1999.
    • 58 See Nick Ritchie, 'Legitimising and Delegitimising Nuclear Weapons', in Borrie, J. and Caughley, T., Viewing Nuclear Weapons Through a Humanitarian Lens (Geneva: UNIDIR, 2013).
  • No related research data.
  • No similar publications.

Share - Bookmark

Cite this article