LOGIN TO YOUR ACCOUNT

Username
Password
Remember Me
Or use your Academic/Social account:

CREATE AN ACCOUNT

Or use your Academic/Social account:

Congratulations!

You have just completed your registration at OpenAire.

Before you can login to the site, you will need to activate your account. An e-mail will be sent to you with the proper instructions.

Important!

Please note that this site is currently undergoing Beta testing.
Any new content you create is not guaranteed to be present to the final version of the site upon release.

Thank you for your patience,
OpenAire Dev Team.

Close This Message

CREATE AN ACCOUNT

Name:
Username:
Password:
Verify Password:
E-mail:
Verify E-mail:
*All Fields Are Required.
Please Verify You Are Human:
fbtwitterlinkedinvimeoflicker grey 14rssslideshare1
Languages: English
Types: Doctoral thesis
Subjects: T1
The use of an electronic olfactory device, termed an electronic 'nose', was investigated for the detection of unique human odour characteristics. The detection of these unique odours was applied to the field of biometrics for access control, where a human's unique characteristics were used to authenticate a user of an access control system. An electronic odour sensing device was designed and constructed using an array of conducting polymer gas sensors in order to facilitate the regular screening of a group of human subjects over a period of six weeks.\ud \ud A static sampling method was used to measure odour levels from human hands, which were found to contain a reliable source of human odour. Human odour levels were low so dynamic sampling proved to be unsuitable for this application due to the dilution of the odour mixture. Feature analysis results revealed that the features of adsorption and desorption gradient contained discriminatory information in addition to the commonly used maximum divergence. Pattern recognition revealed that neural network architectures produced superior results when compared to statistical methods as a result of their ability to model the non-linearities in the data set. The highest recognition rate was 73% which was produced using a Multi-Layer Perceptron (MLP) neural network compared to 63% obtained using the best statistical method of Parzen windows. The majority of the recognition error was caused by a minority of the humans. Analysis of sensor data revealed that only 30% of the sensor array were contributing discriminatory information so it was deduced that performance would undoubtedly improve if a full array of effective sensors were available.\ud \ud Exploratory data analysis revealed that human odour changed from day to day and often an increasing divergence with time was observed. A time-adaptive method was devised which increased the recognition to 89%, but was still too low for use as a biometric recognition device. However, use as a verification device demonstrated acceptable levels of performance but resulted in high levels of user frustration caused by a high proportion of users being falsely rejected. This work demonstrated that an olfactory based biometric access control system could be a realistic proposition but requires further work, especially in the areas of sensor development and unique human odour research, before an operational system could be produced.
  • The results below are discovered through our pilot algorithms. Let us know how we are doing!

    • C.Jennings, 'Biometrics - When the Person is the Key', Sensor Review, Vol. 12 Iss.
    • 3,1992, pp 9-11.
    • RTerlaga, 'Is your LAN Safe ?', United States Banker, Vol. 98 Iss. 7, July 1989, pp 50-52.
    • 52. I.L.Brisbin, J.R.Austad and S.N.Austad, 'Testing the individual odour theory of canine olfaction', Animal Behaviour, Vol. 42, 1991, pp 63-69.
    • 53. J.N.Labows, K.J.McGinley and A.M.Kligman, 'Perspectives on Axillary Odor', Journal ofthe Society ofCosmetic Chemistry, Vol. 34, July 1982, pp 193-202.
    • 55. R.Ellin, R.Farrand, F.Oberst, C.Crouse, N.Billups, W.Koon, N.Musselman and R.Sidell, 'An apparatus for the detection and quantitation of volatile human effluents', Journal ofChromatography, Vol. 100,1974, pp 137-152.
    • 111. M.Holmberg, F.Winquist, I.Lundstrom, J.W. Gardner and E.L. Hines, 'Identification of Paper Quality using a Hybrid Electronic Nose', Sensors and Actuators B, pp 246- 249.
    • 112. M.Josowicz and P.Topart, 'Studies of the Interactions between Organic Vapours and Organic Semiconductors. Applications to Chemical Sensing', Sensors and Sensory Systems for an Electronic Nose, NATO ISO Series, ISBN 0-7923-1693-2.
    • 113. J.J.Cowley and B.W.L.Brooksbank, 'Human Exposure to Putative Pheromones and Changes in Aspects of Social Behavior', Journal ofSteroid, Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Vol. 39 No. 4B, 1991, pp 647-659.
    • 114. A.Dravniels, 'Evaluation of Human Body Odors : Methods and Interpretations', Journal ofthe Society ofCosmetic Chemistry, Vol. 26, pp 551 -571.
    • 115. A.Coghlan, V.Kiernan and J.Mullis, 'Nowhere to Hide', New Scientist, March 1998.
    • 116. D. Stankovic and M.Zlatanovic, 'Versatile Computer Controlled Measuring System for Recording Voltage Current Charcateristics of Various Resistance Sensors', Eurosensors, 1993, p 421.
    • 117. A.Hierlemann, U.Weimar, G.Kraus, M.Schweizer-Berberich and W.Gopel, 'Polymer based Sensor Arrays for the Detection of Hazardous Organic Vapours in the Environment', Sensors and Actuators B, Vol. 26-27,1995, pp 126-134.
    • 118. 'Development of Conducting Polymer Based Sensors for use in the Detection of Body Odour for Access Control', Final Project Report, Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Leeds University,Vol. 2 Appendices, June 1996.
    • 119. D.Evans, AIPR Paper, Betac TRS (Technology Recognition Systems), Alexandria, Virginia, USA, 1996.
    • 120. B.Erbe and J.Shiner, 'How will biometrics affect privacy rights?', Scripps Howard Newsservice, 1998.
    • 121. P.N.Bartlett, J.Gardner and R.G.Whitaker, 'Electrochemical deposition of Conducting Polymers onto electronic Substrates for Sensor Applications', Sensors and Actuators A, Vol. 21-23, 1990, p 911.
  • No related research data.
  • No similar publications.

Share - Bookmark

Cite this article