LOGIN TO YOUR ACCOUNT

Username
Password
Remember Me
Or use your Academic/Social account:

CREATE AN ACCOUNT

Or use your Academic/Social account:

Congratulations!

You have just completed your registration at OpenAire.

Before you can login to the site, you will need to activate your account. An e-mail will be sent to you with the proper instructions.

Important!

Please note that this site is currently undergoing Beta testing.
Any new content you create is not guaranteed to be present to the final version of the site upon release.

Thank you for your patience,
OpenAire Dev Team.

Close This Message

CREATE AN ACCOUNT

Name:
Username:
Password:
Verify Password:
E-mail:
Verify E-mail:
*All Fields Are Required.
Please Verify You Are Human:
fbtwitterlinkedinvimeoflicker grey 14rssslideshare1
Languages: English
Types: Article
Subjects:
Cases:\ud In addition to previously published case reports, further cases of intravascular migration of contraceptive implants have been identified from an information request to two national adverse reaction spontaneous reporting systems. We report on two new cases of insertion into the venous system with subsequent embolism to a pulmonary artery.\ud Conclusion:\ud Incorporating barium sulfate into the implant has facilitated diagnosis of these very rare adverse events with the initial diagnosis of embolism to the pulmonary arterial tree made by chest X-ray. Removal of an implant from a segmental branch of a pulmonary artery is\ud technically challenging and not without risks. Unsuccessful removal appears to be preceded by a delay in diagnosis leading to endothelialization of the implant in the pulmonary arterial wall.\ud Implications:\ud Subdermal placement of contraceptive implants over the anterior surface of the biceps rather than in the sulcus between them biceps and triceps may negate this rare but reported risk.
  • The results below are discovered through our pilot algorithms. Let us know how we are doing!

    • [11] [12] [13] [14] Ernst U. The case of the missing implant: the importance of adhering to insertion guidelines. Poster 180, 8th ESC Congress, Edinburgh. European Journal of Contraception & Reproductive Health Care 2004;9 Suppl 1:141.
    • Rowlands S, Craik J. Contraceptive devices for women: implants, intrauterine devices and other products; in Harrison-Woolrych M, (ed): Medicines for women. Cham, Springer, 2015, pp 227-270.
    • Mansour D. Nexplanon┬« - what Implanon did next. J Fam Plann Reprod Health Care 2010;36: 187-189.
    • Raine JM, Nooney JM. A medicines regulatory perspective on women's medicines; in Harrison-Woolrych M, (ed): Medicines for women. Cham, Springer, 2015, pp 433-458.
    • Mourtialon P, Tixier H, Loffroy R, Maillart JC, Calmelet P, Dellinger P, Vanwymeersch S, El Hassani R, Douvier S, Sagot P. Vascular complication after insertion of a subcutaneous contraceptive implant. Acta Obstetrica et Gynecologica Scandinavica 2008;87:1256-1258.
    • Patel A, Shetty D, Hollings N, Dodds N. Contraceptive implant embolism into the pulmonary artery. Ann Thorac Surg 2014;97:1452.
    • D'Journo XB, Vidal V, Agostoni A. Intravascular pulmonary migration of a subdermal contraceptive implant. Ann Thorac Surg 2015;99:1828.
    • O'Brien A, O'Reilly MK, Sugrue G, Lawler L, Farrelly C. Subdermal contraceptive implant embolism to a pulmonary artery. Ann Thorac Surg 2015;99:2254-2255.
    • Heudes P-M, Querat VL, Darnis E, Defrance C, Douane F, Frampas E. Migration of a contraceptive subcutaneous device into the pulmonary artery. Report of a case. Case Reports in Women's Health 2015;8:6-8.
    • Maroteix P, Dupeyrat J, Roupie E. Embolie pulmonaire par implant progestatif [Pulmonary embolus with a progestogen implant]. Ann Fr Med Urgence 2015;5:332-333.
    • McNicholas C, Maddipati R, Zhao Q, Swor E, Peipert JF. Use of the etonogestrel implant and levonorgestrel intrauterine device beyond the U.S. Food and Drug Administration-approved duration. Obstet Gynecol 2015;125:599-604.
    • Huber J. Pharmacokinetics of Implanon: an integrated analysis. Contraception 1998;58 (supplement 6):85S-90S.
    • Montgomery v Lanarkshire Health Board (Scotland) [2015] UKSC 11.
    • Rowlands S. Legal aspects of contraceptive implants. J Fam Plann Reprod Health Care 2010;36:243-248.
  • No related research data.
  • No similar publications.

Share - Bookmark

Cite this article