LOGIN TO YOUR ACCOUNT

Username
Password
Remember Me
Or use your Academic/Social account:

CREATE AN ACCOUNT

Or use your Academic/Social account:

Congratulations!

You have just completed your registration at OpenAire.

Before you can login to the site, you will need to activate your account. An e-mail will be sent to you with the proper instructions.

Important!

Please note that this site is currently undergoing Beta testing.
Any new content you create is not guaranteed to be present to the final version of the site upon release.

Thank you for your patience,
OpenAire Dev Team.

Close This Message

CREATE AN ACCOUNT

Name:
Username:
Password:
Verify Password:
E-mail:
Verify E-mail:
*All Fields Are Required.
Please Verify You Are Human:
fbtwitterlinkedinvimeoflicker grey 14rssslideshare1
Publisher: Public Library of Science (PLoS)
Journal: PLoS ONE
Languages: English
Types: Article
Subjects: Animal Welfare, Animal Production, Veterinary Diseases, Science, Veterinary Medicine, Mathematics, Statistics, Statistical Methods, Livestock Care, Medicine, Large Animals, Q, R, Animal Management, Veterinary Science, Agriculture, Animal Types, Research Article
Footrot is a widespread, infectious cause of lameness in sheep, with major economic and welfare costs. The aims of this research were: (i) to quantify how veterinary surgeons’ beliefs regarding the efficacy of two treatments for footrot changed following a review of the evidence (ii) to obtain a consensus opinion following group discussions (iii) to capture complementary qualitative data to place their beliefs within a broader clinical context. Grounded in a Bayesian statistical framework, probabilistic elicitation (roulette method) was used to quantify the beliefs of eleven veterinary surgeons during two one-day workshops. There was considerable heterogeneity in veterinary surgeons’ beliefs before they listened to a\ud review of the evidence. After hearing the evidence, seven participants quantifiably changed their beliefs. In particular, two participants who initially believed that foot trimming with topical oxytetracycline was the better treatment, changed to entirely favour systemic and topical oxytetracycline instead. The results suggest that a substantial amount of the variation in beliefs related to differences in veterinary surgeons’ knowledge of the evidence. Although considerable differences in opinion still remained after the evidence review, with several participants having non-overlapping 95% credible intervals,\ud both groups did achieve a consensus opinion. Two key findings from the qualitative data were: (i) veterinary surgeons believed that farmers are unlikely to actively seek advice on lameness, suggesting a proactive veterinary approach is required (ii) more attention could be given to improving the way in which veterinary advice is delivered to farmers. In summary this study has: (i) demonstrated a practical method for probabilistically quantifying how veterinary surgeons’ beliefs change (ii) revealed that the evidence that currently exists is capable of changing veterinary opinion (iii) suggested that improved transfer of research knowledge into veterinary practice is needed (iv) identified some potential obstacles to the implementation of veterinary advice by farmers.
  • The results below are discovered through our pilot algorithms. Let us know how we are doing!

    • 1. Grogono-Thomas R, Johnston KM (1997) A study of ovine lameness. MAFF Open Contract OC59 45K. MAFF final report. MAFF publications.
    • 2. Kaler J, Green LE (2009) Farmers' practices and factors associated with the prevalence of all lameness and lameness attributed to interdigital dermatitis and footrot in sheep flocks in England in 2004. Prev Vet Med 92: 52-59.
    • 3. Nieuwhof GJ, Bishop SC (2005) Costs of the major endemic diseases of sheep in Great Britain and the potential benefits of reduction in disease impact. Anim Sci 81: 23-29.
    • 4. Kaler J, Daniels SLS, Wright JL, Green LE (2010) Randomized clinical trial of long-acting oxytetracycline, foot trimming, and flunixine meglumine on time to recovery in sheep with footrot. J Vet Intern Med 24: 420-425.
    • 5. Kaler J, Wani SA, Hussain I, Beg SA, Makhdoomi M, et al. (2012) A clinical trial comparing parenteral oxytetracyline and enrofloxacin on time to recovery in sheep lame with acute or chronic footrot in Kashmir, India. BMC Vet Res 8: 12.
    • 6. Wassink GJ, King EM, Grogono-Thomas R, Brown JC, Moore LJ, et al. (2010) A within farm clinical trial to compare two treatments (parenteral antibacterials and hoof trimming) for sheep lame with footrot. Prev Vet Med 96: 93-103.
    • 7. Farm Animal Welfare Council (2011) Report to governement: opinion on lameness in sheep. Farm Animal Welfare Council website. Available: http:// www.fawc.org.uk/pdf/sheep-lameness-opinion-110328.pdf. Accessed 2013 Mar 16.
    • 8. Spiegelhalter DJ, Abrams KR, Myles JP (2004) Bayesian approaches to clinical trials and health-care evaluation. Wiley, England.
    • 9. O'Hagan A, Buck CE, Daneshkhah A, Eiser, JR, Garthwaite PH, et al. (2006) Uncertain judgements: eliciting experts' probabilites. Wiley, England.
    • 10. R Development Core Team (2009) R: A language and environment for statistical computing. R foundation for statistical computing,Vienna, Austria. Available: http://wwwR-projectorg/.
    • 11. Kaler J, Wassink GJ, Green LE (2009) The inter- and intra-observer reliability of a locomotion scoring scale for sheep. Vet J 180: 189-194.
    • 12. Green LE, Kaler J, Wassink GJ, King EM, Grogono-Thomas R (2012) Impact of rapid treatment of sheep lame with footrot on welfare and economics and farmer attitudes to lameness in sheep. Anim Welf 21: 65-71.
    • 13. Johnson SR, Tomlinson GA, Hawker GA, Granton JT, Feldman BM (2010) Methods to elicit beliefs for Bayesian priors: a systematic review. J Clin Epidemiol 63: 355-369.
    • 14. Johnson SR, Tomlinson GA, Hawker GA, Granton JT, Grosbein HA, et al. (2010) A valid and reliable belief elicitation method for Bayesian priors. J Clin Epidemiol 63: 370-383.
    • 15. Garthwaite PH, Kadane JB, O'Hagan A (2005) Statistical methods for elicitating prior distributions. J Am Stat Assoc 100: 680-701.
    • 16. Sagliyan A, Gunay C, Han MC (2008) Comparison of the effects of oxytetracycline and penicillin-streptomycin in the treatment of footrot in sheep. J Anim Vet Adv 7: 986-990.
    • 17. Casey RH, Martin PAJ (1988) Effect of foot paring of sheep affected with footrot on response to zinc-sulfate sodium lauryl sulfate foot bathing treatment. Aust Vet J 65: 258-259.
    • 18. Bulgin MS, Lincoln SD, Lane VM, Matlock M (1986) Comparison of treatment methods for the control of contagious ovine foot rot. J Am Vet Med Assoc 189: 194-196.
    • 19. Bagley CV, Healey MC, Hurst RL (1987) Comparison of treatments for ovine foot rot. J Am Vet Med Assoc 191: 541-546.
    • 20. Malecki JC, Coffey L (1987) Treatment of ovine virulent footrot with zinc-sulfate sodium lauryl sulfate footbathing. Aust Vet J 64: 301-304.
    • 21. Egerton JR, Parsonson IM, Graham NPH (1968) Parenteral chemotherapy of ovine foot-rot. Aust Vet J 44: 275-283.
    • 22. Venning CM, Curtis MA, Egerton JR (1990) Treatment of virulent footrot with lincomycin and spectinomycin. Aust Vet J 67: 258-260.
    • 23. Ware JKW, Scrivener CJ, Vizard AL (1994) Efficacy of erythromycin compared with penicillin streptomycin for the treatment of virulent footrot in sheep. Aust Vet J 71: 88-89.
    • 24. Jordan D, Plant JW, Nicol HI, Jessep TM, Scrivener CJ (1996) Factors associated with the effectiveness of antibiotic treatment for ovine virulent footrot. Aust Vet J 73: 211-215.
    • 25. Rendell DK, Callinan APL (1997) Comparison of erythromycin and oxytetracycline for the treatment of virulent footrot in grazing sheep. Aust Vet J 75: 354-354.
    • 26. Grogono-Thomas R, Wilsmore AJ, Simon AJ, Izzard KA (1994) The use of long-acting oxytetracycline for the treatment of ovine footrot. Br Vet J 150: 561- 568.
    • 27. Duncan JS, Grove-White D, Moks E, Carroll D, Oultram JW, et al. (2012) Impact of footrot vaccination and antibiotic therapy on footrot and contagious ovine digital dermatitis. Vet Rec 170: 462-U461.
    • 28. Nelder JA, Mead R (1965) A simplex algorithm for function minimization. Comput J 7: 308-313.
    • 29. Braun V, Clarke V (2006) Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qual Res Psychol 3: 77-101.
    • 30. Toews L (2011) The information infrastructure that supports evidence-based veterinary medicine: a comparison with human medicine. J Vet Med Educ 38: 123-134.
    • 31. Hardin LE, Robertson S (2006) Learning evidence-based veterinary medicine through development of a critically appraised topic. J Vet Med Educ 33: 474- 478.
    • 32. Proctor A, Lowe P, Phillipson J, Donaldson A (2011) Veterinary field expertise: using knowledge gained on the job. Vet Rec 169: 408-410.
    • 33. Jansen J, Steuten CDM, Renes RJ, Aarts N, Lam TJGM (2010) Debunking the myth of the hard-to-reach farmer: effective communication on udder health. J Dairy Sci 93: 1296-1306.
    • 34. Whay HR, Main DCJ (2009) Improving animal welfare: practical approaches for achieving change. In: Grandin T, editor. Improving animal welfare: a Practical Approach: CABI Publishing.
  • No similar publications.

Share - Bookmark

Funded by projects

  • WT | A quantitative (Bayesian) as...

Cite this article