OpenAIRE is about to release its new face with lots of new content and services.
During September, you may notice downtime in services, while some functionalities (e.g. user registration, login, validation, claiming) will be temporarily disabled.
We apologize for the inconvenience, please stay tuned!
For further information please contact helpdesk[at]openaire.eu

fbtwitterlinkedinvimeoflicker grey 14rssslideshare1
Zawadzka, K.; Hanczakowski, M.; Wilding, E.L. (2017)
Publisher: Elsevier
Languages: English
Types: Article
Subjects:

Classified by OpenAIRE into

ACM Ref: ComputingMethodologies_DOCUMENTANDTEXTPROCESSING, ComputingMethodologies_IMAGEPROCESSINGANDCOMPUTERVISION
At retrieval, people can adopt a retrieval orientation by which they recreate the mental operations used at encoding. Monitoring by retrieval orientation leads to assessing all test items for qualities related to the encoding task, which enriches foils with some of the qualities already possessed by targets. We investigated the consequences of adopting a retrieval orientation under conditions of repeated monitoring of the same\ud foils. Participants first processed foils in the context of one of two tests encouraging different retrieval orientations. The foils were then re-used on a subsequent test in which retrieval orientation either matched or mismatched that adopted on the first test. In the aggregate data, false alarms for repeated foils were higher when there was a match between the retrieval orientations on both tests. This demonstrates that when\ud retrieval orientation enriches foils with target-like characteristics, it can backfire when repeated monitoring of the same foils is required.
  • The results below are discovered through our pilot algorithms. Let us know how we are doing!

    • Cognition,  38,  391-­‐404.  http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/a0025548   Mulligan,  N.  W.,  &  Peterson,  D.  (2013).  The  negative  repetition  effect.  Journal  of   Experimental  Psychology:  Learning,  Memory,  and  Cognition,  39,  1403-1416.   http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/a0031789   Mulligan,  N.  W.,  &  Peterson,  D.  J.  (2014).  Analysis  of  the  encoding  factors  that  produce   the  negative  repetition  effect.  Journal  of  Experimental  Psychology:  Learning,   Memory  &  Cognition,  40,  765-­‐775  .  http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/a0035577   Peterson,  D.  J.,  &  Mulligan,  N.  W.  (2013).  The  negative  testing  effect  and  multi-­‐factor   account.  Journal  of  Experimental  Psychology:  Learning,  Memory,  and  Cognition,  39,  
  • No related research data.
  • No similar publications.

Share - Bookmark

Cite this article

Cookies make it easier for us to provide you with our services. With the usage of our services you permit us to use cookies.
More information Ok