Remember Me
Or use your Academic/Social account:


Or use your Academic/Social account:


You have just completed your registration at OpenAire.

Before you can login to the site, you will need to activate your account. An e-mail will be sent to you with the proper instructions.


Please note that this site is currently undergoing Beta testing.
Any new content you create is not guaranteed to be present to the final version of the site upon release.

Thank you for your patience,
OpenAire Dev Team.

Close This Message


Verify Password:
Verify E-mail:
*All Fields Are Required.
Please Verify You Are Human:
fbtwitterlinkedinvimeoflicker grey 14rssslideshare1
Publisher: Public Library of Science
Languages: English
Types: Article
In September 2013 the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change published its first comprehensive assessment of physical climate science in six years, constituting a critical event in the societal debate about climate change. This paper analyses the nature of this debate in one public forum: Twitter. Using webometric methods, tweets were analyzed to discover the hashtags used when people tweeted about the IPCC report, and how Twitter users formed communities around their conversational connections. In short, the paper presents the topics and tweeters at this particular moment in the climate debate.\ud The most used hashtags related to themes of science, geographical location and social issues connected to climate change. Particularly noteworthy were tweets connected to Australian politics, US politics, geoengineering and fracking. Three communities of Twitter users were identified. Researcher coding of Twitter users showed how these varied according to geographical location and whether users were convinced or critical of climate science or policy in their Twitter usage. Overall, users were most likely to converse with users holding similar views. However, two communities displayed significant links between climate convinced and critical users, suggesting that those engaged in the climate debate were exposed to views contrasting with their own.
  • The results below are discovered through our pilot algorithms. Let us know how we are doing!

    • 1. Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (2013) Summary for Policymakers. In: Stocker TF, Qin D, Plattner G-K, Tignor M, Allen SK, et al., editors. Climate Change 2013: The Physical Science Basis. Contribution of Working Group I to the Fifth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Cambridge, United Kingdom and New York, NY, USA: Cambridge University Press. Available: http://www.climatechange2013.org/images/uploads/WGI_AR5_SPM_brochure.pdf.
    • 2. Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (2013) Climate Change 2013: The Physical Science Basis. Contribution of Working Group I to the Fifth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Stocker TF, Qin D, Plattner G-K, Tignor M, Allen SK, et al., editors Cambridge, United Kingdom and New York, NY, USA: Cambridge University Press. Available: http:// www.climatechange2013.org/images/uploads/WGI_AR5_SPM_brochure.pdf.
    • 3. Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (2012) Principles governing IPCC work. Available: http://www.ipcc.ch/pdf/ipcc-principles/ipcc-principles.pdf.
    • 4. Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (2013) Key dates in the AR5 schedule. Available: http://www.ipcc.ch/activities/key_dates_AR5_schedulepdf.pdf.
    • 5. Bruns A, Burgess JE (2011) The use of Twitter hashtags in the formation of ad hoc publics University of Iceland, Reykjavik. Available: http://eprints.qut.edu.au/46515/1/
    • 6. Moser SC, Berzonsky CL (2014) There must be more: Communication to close the Cultural Divide. In: O'Brien K, Selboe E, editors. The Adaptive Challenge of Climate Change. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    • 7. Painter J (2011) Poles apart: the international reporting of climate scepticism. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
    • 8. McCright AM, Dunlap RE (2011) The Politicization of Climate Change and Polarization in the American Public's Views of Global Warming, 2001-2010. Sociol Q 52: 155-194. doi:10.1111/j.1533-8525.2011.01198.x.
    • 9. Kahan DM, Peters E, Wittlin M, Slovic P, Ouellette LL, et al. (2012) The polarizing impact of science literacy and numeracy on perceived climate change risks. Nat Clim Change 2: 732-735. doi:10.1038/nclimate1547.
    • 10. Corner A, Whitmarsh L, Xenias D (2012) Uncertainty, scepticism and attitudes towards climate change: Biased assimilation and attitude polarisation. Clim Change 114: 463-478. doi:10.1007/s10584-012-0424-6.
    • 11. Hoffman AJ (2011) Talking past each other? Cultural framing of skeptical and convinced logics in the climate change debate. Organ Environ 24: 3-33. doi: 10.1177/1086026611404336.
    • 12. Cook J (2010) Newcomers, Start Here. Skeptical Science. Available: http:// www.skepticalscience.com/Newcomers-Start-Here.html. Accessed 12 November 2013.
    • 13. Chew C, Eysenbach G (2010) Pandemics in the Age of Twitter: Content Analysis of Tweets during the 2009 H1N1 Outbreak. PLoS ONE 5: e14118. doi:10.1371/ journal.pone.0014118.
    • 14. Chmiel A, Sienkiewicz J, Thelwall M, Paltoglou G, Buckley K, et al. (2011) Collective Emotions Online and Their Influence on Community Life. PLoS ONE 6: e22207. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0022207.
    • 15. Dodds PS, Harris KD, Kloumann IM, Bliss CA, Danforth CM (2011) Temporal patterns of happiness and information in a global social network: hedonometrics and Twitter. PLoS ONE 6: e26752. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0026752.
    • 16. Sasahara K, Hirata Y, Toyoda M, Kitsuregawa M, Aihara K (2013) Quantifying collective attention from tweet stream. PLoS ONE 8: e61823. doi:10.1371/ journal.pone.0061823.
    • 17. Lin Y-R, Keegan B, Margolin D, Lazer D (2013) Rising tides or rising stars?: Dynamics of shared attention on Twitter during media events. arXiv e-print. Available: http:// arxiv.org/abs/1307.2785. Accessed 10 November 2013.
    • 18. Aiello LM, Petkos G, Martin C, Corney D, Papadopoulos S, et al. (2013) Sensing trending topics in Twitter. IEEE Trans Multimed 15: 1268-1282. doi:10.1109/TMM. 2013.2265080.
    • 20. Honeycutt C, Herring SC (2009) Beyond microblogging: conversation and collaboration via Twitter. 42nd Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, 2009. HICSS '09. pp. 1-10. doi:10.1109/HICSS.2009.89.
    • 21. Huang J, Thornton KM, Efthimiadis EN (2010) Conversational tagging in Twitter. Proceedings of the 21st ACM conference on Hypertext and hypermedia. HT '10. New York, NY, USA: ACM. pp. 173-178. Available: http://doi.acm.org/ 10.1145/1810617.1810647. Accessed 10 November 2013.
    • 22. Boyd D, Golder S, Lotan G (2010) Tweet, tweet, retweet: Conversational aspects of retweeting on Twitter. 2010 43rd Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (HICSS). pp. 1-10. doi:10.1109/HICSS.2010.412.
    • 24. Bruns A, Stieglitz S (2012) Quantitative approaches to comparing communication patterns on Twitter. J Technol Hum Serv 30: 160-185. doi: 10.1080/15228835.2012.744249.
    • 25. Cha M, Benevenuto F, Haddadi H, Gummadi K (2012) The world of connections and information flow in Twitter. IEEE Trans Syst Man Cybern Part Syst Hum 42: 991-998. doi:10.1109/TSMCA.2012.2183359.
    • 26. Wilkinson D, Thelwall M (2011) Researching Personal Information on the Public Web Methods and Ethics. Soc Sci Comput Rev 29: 387-401. doi: 10.1177/0894439310378979.
    • 27. Thelwall M (2009) Introduction to webometrics: quantitative web research for the social sciences. Synth Lect Inf Concepts Retr Serv 1: 1-116. doi:10.2200/ S00176ED1V01Y200903ICR004.
    • 28. Bastian M, Heymann S, Jacomy M (2009) Gephi: an open source software for exploring and manipulating networks. ICWSM. Available: http://www.aaai.org/ocs/ index.php/ICWSM/09/paper/viewPDFInterstitial/154Forum/1009. Accessed 12 November 2013.
    • 29. Blondel VD, Guillaume J-L, Lambiotte R, Lefebvre E (2008) Fast unfolding of communities in large networks. J Stat Mech Theory Exp 2008: P10008. doi: 10.1088/1742-5468/2008/10/P10008.
    • 30. Jaspal R, Nerlich B (2012) When climate science became climate politics: British media representations of climate change in 1988. Public Underst Sci. Available: http:// pus.sagepub.com/content/early/2012/04/10/0963662512440219. Accessed 1 June 2012.
    • 31. Koteyko N, Jaspal R, Nerlich B (2012) Climate change and “climategate” in online reader comments: a mixed methods study. Geogr J: published online: 23 AUG 2012. doi:10.1111/j.1475-4959.2012.00479.x.
    • 35. Crowley K (2013) Pricing carbon: the politics of climate policy in Australia. Wiley Interdiscip Rev Clim Change 4: 603-613. doi:10.1002/wcc.239.
    • 36. Abbott T (2012) Our Plan to Abolish the Carbon Tax. Available: http:// shared.liberal.org.au/Share/HRO_CT_doc.pdf.
    • 37. Leaders Debate: Climate change (2013). Available: http://www.youtube.com/watch? v=GKq6_l_N_EY&feature=youtube_gdata_player. Accessed 22 October 2013.
    • 38. Revkin A (2012) One reason for debate climate silence. Dot Earth Blog. Available: http://dotearth.blogs.nytimes.com/2012/10/23/one-reason-for-debate-climate-silence/. Accessed 1 November 2013.
    • 39. Australian Government Department of the Environment (2011) Launch of the Climate Commission. Available: http://www.climatechange.gov.au/ministers/hon-greg-combetam-mp/media-release/launch-climate-commission. Accessed 22 October 2013.
    • 40. Swart NC, Weaver AJ (2012) The Alberta oil sands and climate. Nat Clim Change 2: 134-136. doi:10.1038/nclimate1421.
    • 45. Stilgoe J (2013) Why has geoengineering been legitimised by the IPCC? Guard Polit Sci. Available: http://www.theguardian.com/science/political-science/2013/sep/27/ science-policy1. Accessed 22 October 2013.
    • 46. Morton O (2013) The IPCC and geoengineering. Heliophage. Available: http:// heliophage.wordpress.com/2013/09/28/the-ipcc-and-geoengineering/. Accessed 22 October 2013.
    • 47. Connor S (2013) Geo-engineering has the potential to destroy as well as preserve. The Independent. Available: http://www.independent.co.uk/voices/comment/ geoengineering-has-the-potential-to-destroy-as-well-as-preserve-8854394.html. Accessed 8 November 2013.
    • 48. Hulme M (2012) An unwinnable fight. Nat Clim Change 2: 223-224. doi:10.1038/ nclimate1459.
    • 49. Bruns A (2008) Life beyond the public sphere: Towards a networked model for political deliberation. Inf Polity Int J Gov Democr Inf Age 13: 65-79.
    • 50. Elsasser SW, Dunlap RE (2013) Leading voices in the denier choir: Conservative columnists' dismissal of global warming and denigration of climate science. Am Behav Sci 57: 754-776. doi:10.1177/0002764212469800.
    • 51. Baxter LA (2011) Voicing Relationships: A Dialogic Perspective. Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications. 225 p.
    • 52. Collins L (2013) Do online user comments provide a space for deliberative democracy? Mak Sci Public. Available: http://blogs.nottingham.ac.uk/ makingsciencepublic/2013/10/11/do-online-user-comments-provide-a-space-fordeliberative-democracy/. Accessed 1 November 2013.
  • Discovered through pilot similarity algorithms. Send us your feedback.

Share - Bookmark

Funded by projects

Cite this article