Remember Me
Or use your Academic/Social account:


Or use your Academic/Social account:


You have just completed your registration at OpenAire.

Before you can login to the site, you will need to activate your account. An e-mail will be sent to you with the proper instructions.


Please note that this site is currently undergoing Beta testing.
Any new content you create is not guaranteed to be present to the final version of the site upon release.

Thank you for your patience,
OpenAire Dev Team.

Close This Message


Verify Password:
Verify E-mail:
*All Fields Are Required.
Please Verify You Are Human:
fbtwitterlinkedinvimeoflicker grey 14rssslideshare1
Peckover, Sue; Smith, Sue; Wondergem, Fiona (2013)
Publisher: John Wiley and Sons
Languages: English
Types: Article

Classified by OpenAIRE into

mesheuropmc: behavioral disciplines and activities
Serious case reviews (SCRs), undertaken when a child has died or been seriously harmed, are an important feature of child protection in England. They are substantial exercises, but little research has examined the everyday work processes associated with their production. This study, undertaken during 2011, explored the views and experiences of NHS Named and Designated Nurses and Doctors for Safeguarding Children about their involvement in SCRs. Nineteen telephone interviews were undertaken and the data thematically analysed. The study found that doing SCRs involved additional work and staff did not always feel fully supported or prepared. Doing SCRs is a rigid and bureaucratic process which sometimes detracted from the case itself. The study also found mixed views about the value of SCRs and the extent to which they promote learning and child-centred practice. The findings contribute to overall understanding of how this process is undertaken, and help open up to scrutiny the work required and the challenges generated for those involved in SCRs.
  • The results below are discovered through our pilot algorithms. Let us know how we are doing!

    • Devaney J.,Lazenbatt A. & Bunting L. 2011. Inquiring into Non-Accidental Child Deaths: Reviewing the Review Process. British Journal of Social Work 41: 242-260.
    • Fish S., Munro E. & Bairstow S. 2008. Learning together to safeguard children: developing a multi-agency systems approach for case reviews. SCIE Report 19. Social Care Institute for Excellence: London. Available www.scie.org.uk
    • Fish S., Munro E. & Bairstow S. 2010. Piloting the SCIE 'systems' model for case reviews: learning from the North West. SCIE: London. Available www.scie.org.uk Loughton T. (2012). Letter to LSCB chairs, Directors of children's services: evaluation of serious case review overview reports. Tim Loughton, Parliamentary UnderSecretary of State for Children and Families. 5 July 2012. London, Department of Education.
    • Munro E. 2005. A systems approach to investigating child abuse deaths. British Journal of Social Work 35: 531-546.
    • Munro E. 2004. 'The impact of child abuse inquiries since 1990'. In Stanley, N. and Manthorpe J. (eds). The Age of the Inquiry: Learning and Blaming in Health and Social Care. Routledge: London.
    • Rose W. & Barnes J. 2008. Improving Safeguarding Practice. Study of Serious Case Reviews 2001-2003. Department for Children, Schools and Families: London.
    • Rowse V. 2009. Children's nurses' experience of child protection - what helps? Child Abuse Review 18: 168-180.
    • Skellern C. 2008. Medical experts and the law: Safeguarding children, the public and the profession. Journal of Paediatrics and Child Health 44: 736-742.
    • Stanley N. & Manthorpe J. 2004. The Age of the Inquiry: Learning and Blaming in Health and Social Care. Routledge: London.
    • Vincent S. 2009. Child death and serious case review processes in the UK. CLiCP Briefing 5. University of Edinburgh/NSPCC Centre for UK-wide Learning in Child Protection: Edinburgh.
  • No related research data.
  • No similar publications.

Share - Bookmark

Cite this article