Remember Me
Or use your Academic/Social account:


Or use your Academic/Social account:


You have just completed your registration at OpenAire.

Before you can login to the site, you will need to activate your account. An e-mail will be sent to you with the proper instructions.


Please note that this site is currently undergoing Beta testing.
Any new content you create is not guaranteed to be present to the final version of the site upon release.

Thank you for your patience,
OpenAire Dev Team.

Close This Message


Verify Password:
Verify E-mail:
*All Fields Are Required.
Please Verify You Are Human:
fbtwitterlinkedinvimeoflicker grey 14rssslideshare1
Piazza, Roberta (2007)
Publisher: SILTA
Languages: English
Types: Part of book or chapter of book
This comparative study explores the various modalities of interactive academic discourse in a corpus of English and Italian seminars. It investigates how in the two different contexts undergraduate students construct their identity and position themselves within the academic community through the interaction with their tutors. It focuses on the students' questioning strategies and their use of politeness and claims that the interplay between these two areas can usefully shed light on the nature of the academic exchanges observed.
  • The results below are discovered through our pilot algorithms. Let us know how we are doing!

    • Bashiruddin A., Edge J., Hughes-Pelerin E. (1990), “Who speaks in seminars? Status, culture and gender at Durham university”, in: Clark R., Fairclough N., Ivanic R., Mcleod N. (eds.), Language and power, Lancaster, Centre for Information on Language Teaching and Research for the British Association of Applied Linguistics, pp. 74-84.
    • Baumgart N. (1976), “Verbal interaction in university tutorials”, Higher Education, 5, pp. 301-317.
    • Benwell B. (1996), The discourse of university tutorials, Unpublished doctoral thesis, University of Nottingham.
    • Benwell B. (1999), “The organisation of knowledge in British university tutorial discourse: Issues, pedagogic discourse strategies and disciplinary identity”, Pragmatics, 9, 4, pp. 535-565.
    • Benwell B., Stokoe, E. (2002), “Constructing discussion tasks in university tutorials: Shifting dynamics and identities”, Discourse Studies, 4/4, pp. 429-553.
    • Benwell B., Stokoe E. (2005), “University students resisting academic identity”, in: Richards K., Seedhouse P. (eds.), Applying Conversation Analysis, Houndsmills, Basingstoke, Palgrave, pp. 124-139.
    • Benwell B., Stokoe E. (2006), Discourse and identity, Edinburgh, Edinburgh University Press.
    • Bublitz W. (1981), “Conducive yes-no questions in English”, Linguistics, 19, pp. 851-870.
    • Brown R., Gilman A. (1960), “The pronouns of power and solidarity”, in: Sebeok T.A. (ed.), Style in language, Cambridge (Mass.), MIT Press, pp. 253-276.
    • Brown P., Levinson S. (1987 [1978]), Politeness. Some universals in language use, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.
    • Ciliberti A., Anderson L. (eds.) (1999), Le forme della comunicazione accademica, Milano, Franco Angeli.
    • Clark R., Fairclough N., Ivanic R., Mcleod N. (eds.) (1990), Language and power, Lancaster, Centre for Information on Language Teaching and Research for the British Association of Applied Linguistics.
    • Coupland N., Coupland J., Giles H. (1991), Language, society and the elderly: Discourse, identity and ageing, Cambridge (Mass.), Blackwell.
    • Dee J. (1976), “Group discussions in biological sciences”, in: Simons H., Squires G. (eds.), Small group teaching, London, The Nuffield Foundation, pp. 57-75.
    • De Klerk V. (1995), “The discourse of postgraduate seminars”, Linguistics and Education, 7, pp.157-174.
    • Dillon J. (1990), The practice of questioning, London & New York, Routledge.
    • Garfinkel H. (1967), Studies in ethnomethodology, Englewood Cliffs, NJ, PrenticeHall.
    • Good T. (1981), “Teacher expectations and student perceptions: A decade of research”, Educational Leadership, 38, pp. 415-423.
    • Good T., Slavings R., Harel K., Emerson H. (1987), “Student passivity: A study of question asking in K-12 classrooms”, Sociology of Education, 60, pp. 181-199.
    • Goody E. (ed.) (1978), Questions and Politeness. Strategies in social interaction, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.
    • Graesser A., Person N. (1994), “Question asking during tutoring”, American Educational Research Journal, 31, 1, pp.104-137.
    • Håkansson G., Lindberg I. (1988), “What's the question? Investigating questions in second language classrooms”, AILA Review, 5, pp. 73-88.
    • Halliday M.A.K. (1985), An introduction to Functional Grammar, London, Arnold.
    • Harris S. (1984), “Questions as a mode of control in magistrates' court”. International Journal of the Sociology of Language, 49, pp.5-27.
    • Harris S. (2003), “Politeness and power: Making and responding to 'requests' in institutional settings”, Text, 23, pp. 27-52.
    • Heritage J. (2005), “Conversation analysis and institutional talk”, in: Fitch K.L., Sanders R.E. (eds.), Handbook of language and social interaction, Mahwah, N.J., Lawrence Erlbaum, pp. 103-147.
    • Journal of Pragmatics, (2007), 39, edited by H. Spencer-Oatey and S. Ruhi.
    • Kearsley G. (1976), “Questions and question asking in verbal discourse: A crossdisciplinary review”, Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 5, 4, pp. 355-375.
    • Linell P., Gustansson L., Juvonen P. (1988), “Interactional dominance in dyadic communication: A presentation of initiative-response analysis”, Linguistics, 26, pp. 415-442.
    • Luchjenbroers J. (1997), “In your own words… Questions and answers in a Supreme Court trial”, Journal of Pragmatics, 27, pp. 477-503.
    • Lumbelli L. (ed.) (1974), Pedagogia della comunicazione verbale, Milano, Angeli.
    • Mauss M. (1954 [1925]), The gift (trans. I. Cunnison), London, Cohen and West.
    • Orletti F. (1981a), “Classroom verbal interaction: A conversational analysis”, in: Parret H., Sbisà M., Verschueren J. (eds.), Possibilities and limitations of pragmatics, Proceedings of the Conference on Pragmatics, Urbino, July 8-14, 1979, Amsterdam, Benjamins, pp. 531-549.
    • Orletti F. (1981b), “Dall'etnografia della comunicazione in classe alla educazione linguistica”, Lingua e nuova didattica, X, pp. 8-17.
    • Piazza R. (1999), “Modalità dell'atto del domandare nei seminari italiani”, in: Ciliberti A., Anderson L. (eds.), Le forme della comunicazione accademica, Milano, Franco Angeli, pp. 133-165.
    • Piazza R. (2001), “Une analyse contrastive des questions posées par le enseignants dans les séminaires universitaires anglais et italiens”, in: Paganini G. (ed.), Différences et proximités culturelles: l'Europe, Paris, L'Harmattan, pp. 115-135.
    • Piazza R. (2002), “A pragmatic analysis of the conduciveness in the questions produced in an academic context”, Journal of Pragmatics, 34, pp. 509-527.
    • Reynolds M. (1990), “Classroom power: Some dynamics of classroom talk”, in: Clark R., Fairclough N., Ivanic R., Mcleod N. (eds.), Language and power, Lancaster, Centre for Information on Language Teaching and Research for the British Association of Applied Linguistics, pp. 122-136.
    • Richards K., Skelton J. (1991), “How critical can you get?”, in: Adams P., Heaton B., Howarth P. (eds.), Socio-cultural issues in English for Academic Purposes, London, MacMillan, pp. 24-41.
    • Rudolph D. (1994), “Constructing an apprenticeship with discourse strategies: Professor-graduate student interactions”, Language in Society, 23, 2, pp. 199- 230.
    • Searle J. (1969), Speech acts, London, Cambridge University Press.
    • Schegloff E.A. (1997), “Whose text? Whose context?”, Discourse and Society, 8, 2, pp. 165-187.
    • Shuy R. (1995), “How a judge's voir dire can teach a jury what to say”, Discourse and Society, 6, 2, pp. 207-222.
    • Simpson P. (1995), “Politeness phenomena in Ionesco's The lesson”, in: Carter R., Simpson P. (eds.), Language, discourse and literature, London, Routledge, pp.171-193.
    • Sinclair J., Coulthard, M. (eds.) (1975), Towards an analysis of classroom discourse, London, Oxford University Press.
    • Spencer-Oatey H. (2007), “Theories of identity and the analysis of face”, Journal of Pragmatics, 39, pp. 639-656.
    • Weber E. (1993), Varieties of questions in English conversation, Amsterdam & Philadelphia, Benjamins.
    • Woodbury H. (1984), “The strategic use of questions in court”, Semiotica, 48, 3, 4, pp. 197-228.
    • Wu K. (1993), “Classroom interaction and teacher questions revisited”, RELC Journal, 24, 2, pp. 49-68.
  • No related research data.
  • No similar publications.

Share - Bookmark

Download from

Cite this article