Remember Me
Or use your Academic/Social account:


Or use your Academic/Social account:


You have just completed your registration at OpenAire.

Before you can login to the site, you will need to activate your account. An e-mail will be sent to you with the proper instructions.


Please note that this site is currently undergoing Beta testing.
Any new content you create is not guaranteed to be present to the final version of the site upon release.

Thank you for your patience,
OpenAire Dev Team.

Close This Message


Verify Password:
Verify E-mail:
*All Fields Are Required.
Please Verify You Are Human:
fbtwitterlinkedinvimeoflicker grey 14rssslideshare1
Publisher: Elsevier
Journal: Cognitive Development
Languages: English
Types: Article
Subjects: Developmental and Educational Psychology, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, R1
Children’s joint action and advance planning skills are both undergoing development during the preschool years, but little is known about how joint action contexts influence children’s advance planning. In the first experiment, three-year-olds (N = 32) were better at planning ahead for a task in an individual compared to a joint condition when playing with a social partner. A second experiment indicated that three-year-olds (N = 32) were as able to plan in advance with a non-social machine as when playing alone, suggesting that the effects found in the first experiment were not a function of different timing or cognitive demands between individual and joint conditions, but were unique to the social context.
  • The results below are discovered through our pilot algorithms. Let us know how we are doing!

    • Baron, R. S. (1986). Distraction-conflict theory: Progress and problems. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 19, 1-39. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0065-2601(08)60211-7
    • Bartsch, K., Wade, C. E., & Estes, D. (2011). Children's attention to others' beliefs during persuasion: Improvised and selected arguments to puppets and people. Social Development, 20, 316-333.
    • Beier, J. S., Over, H., & Carpenter, M. (2014). Young children help others to achieve their social goals. Developmental Psychology, 50, 934.
    • Bekkering, H., De Bruijn, E. R., Cuijpers, R. H., Newman-Norlund, R., Van Schie, H. T., & Meulenbroek, R. (2009). Joint action: Neurocognitive mechanisms supporting human interaction. Topics in Cognitive Science, 1, 340-352.
    • Bibok, M. B., Carpendale, J. I., & Müller, U. (2009). Parental scaffolding and the development of executive function. New Directions for Child and Adolescent Development, 123, 17-34. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/cd.233
    • Brownell, C. A. (2011). Early developments in joint action. Review of Philosophy and Psychology, 2, 193-211. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s13164-011-0056-1
    • Carlson, S. M., Mandell, D. J., & Williams, L. (2004). Executive function and theory of mind: Stability and prediction from ages 2 to 3. Developmental Psychology, 40, 1105.
    • De la Ossa, J. L., & Gauvain, M. (2001). Joint attention by mothers and children while using plans. International Journal of Behavioral Development, 25, 176-183. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/01650250042000168
    • Diesendruck, G., & Ben-Eliyahu, A. (2006). The relationships among social cognition, peer acceptance, and social behavior in Israeli kindergarteners. International Journal of Behavioral Development, 30, 137-147.
    • Duran, R. T., & Gauvain, M. (1993). The role of age versus expertise in peer collaboration during joint planning. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 55, 227-242. http://dx.doi.org/10.1006/jecp.1993.1013
    • Falck-Ytter, T., Gredebäck, G., & von Hofsten, C. (2006). Infants predict other people's action goals. Nature Neuroscience, 9, 878-879. http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nn1729
    • Frye, D., Zelazo, P. D., & Palfai, T. (1995). Theory of mind and rule-based reasoning. Cognitive Development, 10, 483-527.
    • Gauvain, M., & Rogoff, B. (1989). Collaborative problem solving and children's planning skills. Developmental Psychology, 25, 139-151. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037//0012-1649.25.1.139
    • Gauvain, M. (1992). Social influences on the development of planning in advance and during action. International Journal of Behavioral Development, 15, 377-398. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/016502549201500306
    • Gräfenhain, M., Behne, T., Carpenter, M., & Tomasello, M. (2009). Young children's understanding of joint commitments. Developmental Psychology, 45, 1430-1443. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/a0016122
    • Hala, S., Hug, S., & Henderson, A. (2003). Executive function and false-belief understanding in preschool children: Two tasks are harder than one. Journal of Cognition and Development, 4, 275-298.
    • Hamann, K., Warneken, F., & Tomasello, M. (2012). Children's developing commitments to joint goals. Child Development, 83, 137-145.
    • Hammond, S. I., Müller, U., Carpendale, J. I. M., Bibok, M. B., & Liebermann-Finestone, D. P. (2012). The effects of parental scaffolding on preschoolers' executive function. Developmental Psychology, 48, 271-281. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/a0025519
    • Hughes, C. (1998). Executive function in preschoolers: Links with theory of mind and verbal ability. British Journal of Developmental Psychology, 16, 233-253.
    • Hunnius, S., Bekkering, H., & Cillessen, A. H. N. (2009). The association between intention understanding and peer cooperation in toddlers. European Journal of Developmental Science, 3, 368-388.
    • Knoblich, G., & Jordan, J. S. (2003). Action coordination in groups and individuals: Learning anticipatory control. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 29, 1006-1016. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0278-7393.29.5.1006
    • Lalonde, C. E., & Chandler, M. J. (1995). False belief understanding goes to school: On the social-emotional consequences of coming early or late to a first theory of mind. Cognition & Emotion, 9, 167-185.
    • Müller, U., Liebermann-Finestone, D. P., Carpendale, J. I., Hammond, S. I., & Bibok, M. B. (2012). Knowing minds, controlling actions: The developmental relations between theory of mind and executive function from 2 to 4 years of age. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 111, 331-348.
    • McCormack, T., & Atance, C. M. (2011). Planning in young children: A review and synthesis. Developmental Review, 31, 1-31.
    • Meltzoff, A. N. (1995). Understanding the intentions of others: Re-enactment of intended acts by 18-month-old children. Developmental Psychology, 31, 838.
    • Meyer, M., Bekkering, H., Paulus, M., & Hunnius, S. (2010). Joint action coordination in 2½-and 3-year-old children. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 4, 1-7. http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2010.00220
    • Meyer, M., van der Wel, R. P. R. D., & Hunnius, S. (2013). Higher-order planning for individual and joint object manipulations. Experimental Brain Research, 225, 579-588. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00221-012-3398-8
    • Meyer, M., Bekkering, H., Haartsen, R., Stapel, J. C., & Hunnius, S. (2015). The role of action prediction and inhibitory control for joint action coordination in toddlers. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 139, 203-220.
    • Meyer, M., van der Wel, R. P., & Hunnius, S. (2016). Planning my actions to accommodate yours: Joint action development during early childhood. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B, 371, 20150371.
    • Milward, S. J., Kita, S., & Apperly, I. A. (2014). The development of co-representation effects in a joint task: Do children represent a co-actor? Cognition, 132, 269-279.
    • Moriguchi, Y., Matsunaka, R., Itakura, S., & Hiraki, K. (2012). Observed human actions, and not mechanical actions, induce searching errors in infants. Child Development Research, 1-5.
    • Radziszewska, B., & Rogoff, B. (1988). Influence of adult and peer collaborators on children's planning skills. Developmental Psychology, 24, 840-848.
    • Rakoczy, H., Warneken, F., & Tomasello, M. (2008). The sources of normativity: Young children's awareness of the normative structure of games. Developmental Psychology, 44, 875-881.
    • Rakoczy, H. (2008). Taking fiction seriously: Young children understand the normative structure of joint pretence games. Developmental Psychology, 44, 1195-1201.
    • Razza, R. A., & Blair, C. (2009). Associations among false-belief understanding, executive function, and social competence: A longitudinal analysis. Journal of Applied Developmental Psychology, 30, 332-343.
    • Riggs, N. R., Jahromi, L. B., Razza, R. P., Dillworth-Bart, J. E., & Mueller, U. (2006). Executive function and the promotion of social-emotional competence. Journal of Applied Developmental Psychology, 27, 300-309.
    • Rogoff, B., Gauvain, M., & Gardner, W. (1987). The development of children's skills in adjusting plans to circumstances. In S. L. Friedman, E. K. Scholnick, & R. R. Cocking (Eds.), Blueprints for thinking: The role of planning in cognitive development (1987) (pp. 303-320). New York, NY, US: Cambridge University Press.
    • Rueda, M. R., Posner, M. I., & Rothbart, M. K. (2005). The development of executive attention: Contributions to the emergence of self-regulation. Developmental Neuropsychology, 28, 573-594.
    • Saby, J. N., Bouquet, C. A., & Marshall, P. J. (2014). Young children co-represent a partner's task: Evidence for a joint Simon effect in five-year-olds. Cognitive Development, 32, 38-45.
    • Schmidt, M. F., Rakoczy, H., & Tomasello, M. (2012). Young children enforce social norms selectively depending on the violator's group affiliation. Cognition, 124, 325-333.
    • Sebanz, N., & Knoblich, G. (2009). Prediction in joint action: What, when, and where. Topics in Cognitive Science, 1, 353-367. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1756-8765.2009.01024.x
    • Sebanz, N., Knoblich, G., & Prinz, W. (2003). Representing others' actions: Just like one's own? Cognition, 88, B11-B21. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0010-0277(03)00043-X
    • Sebanz, N., Bekkering, H., & Knoblich, G. (2006). Joint action: Bodies and minds moving together. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 10, 70-76.
    • Stenzel, A., Dolk, T., Colzato, L. S., & Sellaro, R. (2014). The joint Simon effect depends on perceived agency, but not intentionality, of the alternative action. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 8, 1-10.
    • Suddendorf, T., Nielsen, M., & Von Gehlen, R. (2011). Children's capacity to remember a novel problem and to secure its future solution. Developmental Science, 14, 26-33.
    • Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society: the development of higher mental process. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
    • Warneken, F., Steinwender, J., Hamann, K., & Tomasello, M. (2014). Young children's planning in a collaborative problem-solving task. Cognitive Development, 31, 48-58. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cogdev.2014.02.003
    • Wilson, M., & Knoblich, G. (2005). The case for motor involvement in perceiving conspecifics. Psychological Bulletin, 131, 460-473. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.131.3.460
    • Wittenburg, P., Brugman, H., Russel, A., Klassmann, A., & Sloetjes, H. (2006, May). Elan: a professional framework for multimodality research. In Proceedings of LREC (Vol. 2006, p. 5th).
    • Woodward, A. L. (1998). Infants selectively encode the goal object of an actor's reach. Cognition, 69, 1-34.
    • Woodward, A. L., Sommerville, J. A., Gerson, S., Henderson, A. M., & Buresh, J. (2009). The emergence of intention attribution in infancy. Psychology of learning and motivation, 51, 187-222.
  • No related research data.
  • No similar publications.

Share - Bookmark

Cite this article