OpenAIRE is about to release its new face with lots of new content and services.
During September, you may notice downtime in services, while some functionalities (e.g. user registration, login, validation, claiming) will be temporarily disabled.
We apologize for the inconvenience, please stay tuned!
For further information please contact helpdesk[at]

fbtwitterlinkedinvimeoflicker grey 14rssslideshare1
Stoner, Jo
Languages: English
Types: Doctoral thesis
Subjects: CC, CB
This thesis investigates evidence for the cultural lives of domestic objects in Late Antiquity. As such, it focuses on objects as meaningful possessions, rather than their practical, utilitarian functions. In particular, this research seeks to reveal the personal meaning for domestic possessions and their sentimental, as opposed to economic, value. This is something that has either been ignored or mentioned only in passing and without further qualification in existing studies of late antique material culture. \ud \ud This research is underpinned by specific theoretical approaches from the disciplines of archaeology, art history and anthropology. Object biography, or the understanding that events in the lives of objects can affect their meaning and value, is key to this investigation and provides the opportunity to approach the material evidence in a novel way. It allows the direct comparison of previously disparate textual and archaeological sources to better understand the relationships between people and their possessions across a broad social spectrum. It also governs the structure of the thesis, which has chapters on heirlooms, gifts, and souvenirs – all of which are defined by an element of their biography, namely the context of their acquisition. The case study chapter also examines a generally ignored artefact type – the basket – bringing this undervalued example of domestic material culture to the fore.\ud \ud This thesis reveals that personal domestic possessions had the capacity to function as material vehicles for intangible thoughts, memories, and relationships. This function was known and exploited by the people of Late Antiquity in order to create and possess meaningful domestic objects of various types. It provides a new interpretation of domestic material culture that is different to more traditional studies of economic and social status. As such, it allows an understanding of how material culture transformed dwellings into homes during this period.
  • The results below are discovered through our pilot algorithms. Let us know how we are doing!

    • Fig. 2: Plaque depicting St Peter, ivory, c. AD 500, Ravenna, Glencairn Museum, Pennsylvania [Photo: Weitzmann (1979) 539-40, no. 485.] Fig. 3: Oil lamp with menorah decoration, terracotta, AD 350-450, Metropolitan Museum of Art 91.1.1621. [Photo: © Metropolitan Museum of Art website].
    • Theophilus, Homily on the Virgin Ed. & trans. W.H. Worrell (1923) The Coptic manuscripts in the Freer Collection (Macmillan: New York).
    • Virgil, Aeneid Ed. and trans. H.R. Fairclough (1918) Virgil, vol. 2, LCL.
    • Maines, R.P., and Glynn, J.J. (1993) “Numinous Objects”, The Public Historian 15(1) 9-25.
    • Reece, R. (1988) “Interpreting Roman Hoards”, WorldArch 20(2) 261-269.
    • _______ (2003) “Coins and the late Roman economy”, in L. Lavan & W. Bowden (eds) Theory and Practice in Late Antique Archaeology (Leiden: Brill) 139-168.
    • Reese, D.S. (1987) “Palaikastro Shells and Bronze Age Purple-Dye Production in the Mediterranean Basin,” BSA 82, 201-206.
    • Thomas, J.D. (1978) “O.Florida 14: Man or Woman?”, ChrÉg 53, 142-144.
    • Fig. 74: Dominus Iulius mosaic featuring baskets of gifts top left, bottom left, and bottom right, late fourth century AD, Carthage, Bardo Museum, Tunisia [Photo: ©, accessed 11/04/15].
  • No related research data.
  • No similar publications.

Share - Bookmark

Download from

Cite this article

Cookies make it easier for us to provide you with our services. With the usage of our services you permit us to use cookies.
More information Ok