Remember Me
Or use your Academic/Social account:


Or use your Academic/Social account:


You have just completed your registration at OpenAire.

Before you can login to the site, you will need to activate your account. An e-mail will be sent to you with the proper instructions.


Please note that this site is currently undergoing Beta testing.
Any new content you create is not guaranteed to be present to the final version of the site upon release.

Thank you for your patience,
OpenAire Dev Team.

Close This Message


Verify Password:
Verify E-mail:
*All Fields Are Required.
Please Verify You Are Human:
fbtwitterlinkedinvimeoflicker grey 14rssslideshare1
Boyce, Melanie J.
Languages: English
Types: Doctoral thesis
There has been very little research that has explored self-help groups (SHGs) in relation to self-harm. Yet, from the limited research undertaken self-harm SHGs appear to provide a valuable and much needed source of support. This study explores the perspectives of those who attend and support such groups with the aim of building a more comprehensive understanding of the role of these groups.\ud \ud The research is framed within an interpretative paradigm of inquiry and guided by a qualitative case study approach. The first phase involved working with two self-harm SHGs to gain an in-depth understanding of the strengths and challenges specific to these groups. In the second phase, semi-structured interviews were undertaken with four individuals who had experience of supporting self-harm SHGs directly and/or at an organisational level to gain broader insights into the running and development of such groups.\ud \ud A thematic approach to the analysis of the findings illustrated that these groups provide a safe, non-judgmental space where those who self-harm can meet, listen and talk to others who share similar experiences for mutual and reciprocal peer support. Participation in the groups was found to offer direct individual benefits and wider gains, along with external and internal challenges.\ud \ud Despite a current interest in the value of peer support in mental health services, the thesis illustrates that this is largely missing for those who self-harm. Concerns about the risk of peer support for those who self-harm remains a barrier affecting the development of self-harm SHGs, which is further constrained by a privileging of an individualistic approach in mainstream services. The thesis contributes new evidence about the value of collective peer support for those who self-harm. In addition it provides a more nuanced theoretical understanding of the paradoxical meaning of ‘safe space’ in a SHG for those who self-harm.
  • The results below are discovered through our pilot algorithms. Let us know how we are doing!

    • without suicidal intent is about “coping with the uncopeable” and is more about selfpreservation and survival (Pembroke, 1994:1). This clear distinction is also widely supported in the literature by a range of authors (Harrison, 1995; Smith, Cox & Saradjian, 1998; McAllister, 2003; Smith & Clarke, 2003; Simpson, 2006; Allen, 2007; Sutton, 2007; Inckle, 2014).
    • Örulv, L. (2012). Reframing dementia in Swedish self-help group conversations.
    • International Journal of Self-help & Self-Care, 6(1), pp.9-41.
    • Owen, D., Horrocks, J. & House, A. (2002). Fatal and non-fatal repetition of self-harm.
    • British Journal of Psychiatry, 181, pp.193-199.
    • Parker, K. & Lindsay, H. (2004). Self-injury support & self-help groups. Bristol: Bristol Crisis Service for Women.
    • Pembroke, L. (1994). Introduction. In: L. Pembroke, ed. 1994. Self-harm: Perspectives from personal experience. London: Survivors Speak Out. Ch.1.
    • Pembroke, L. (2000). Cutting the risk: self-harm, self-care and risk reduction. London: National Self-Harm Network.
    • Pembroke, L., (2006a). Offer us what we want. Mental Health Today, Jul-Aug, pp.16-18.
    • Pembroke, L. (2006b). Limiting self-harm. Emergency nurse, 14(5), pp.8-10.
    • Pembroke, L. (2006c). Limiting the damage. Mental Health Today, April, pp.27-29.
    • Pembroke, L. (2007). Harm minimisation: Limiting the damage of self-injury. In: H.
    • Spandler and S. Warner, eds. Beyond Fear and Control: Working with young people who self harm. Ross-on-Wye: PCCS books. Ch. 11.
    • Pengelly, N., Ford, B., Blenkiron, P. & Reilly, S. (2008). Harm minimisation after repeated self-harm: development of a trust handbook. Psychiatric Bulletin, 32(2), pp.60-63.
    • Perseius, K-I., Ojehagen, A., Ekdahl, S., Asberg, M. & Samuelsson, M. (2003). Treatment of suicidal and deliberate self-harming patients with borderline personality disorder using dialectical behavioural therapy: The patients' and the therapists' perceptions. Archives of Psychiatric Nuring, 17(5), pp.218-227.
    • Pistrang, N., Barker, C. & Humphreys, K. (2008) Mutual Help Groups for Mental Health Problems: A Review of Effectiveness Studies. American Journal of Community Psychology, 42(1-2), pp.110-121.
    • Powell, T. & Perron, B.E. (2010). Self-help groups and mental health/substance use agencies: The benefits of organizational exchange. Substance Use & Misuse, 45(3), pp.315-329.
    • Ramazanoglu, C. & Holland, J. (2002). Feminist methodology: Challenges and choices.
    • Ramon, S. & Williams, J. E. (2005). Towards a conceptual framework: the meanings attached to the psychosocial, the promise and the problems. In S. Ramon & J.E. Williams, eds. Mental health at the crossroads: The promise of the psychosocial approach.
    • Aldershot: Ashgate Publishing. Ch1.
    • Rappaport, J. (1993) Narrative studies, personal stories and identity transformation in the mutual help context. The Journal of Applied Behavioural Science, 29(2), pp.239-256.
    • Steffen, V. (1997) Life stories and shared experience. Social Science & Medicine, 45(1), pp. 99-111.
    • Rapping, E. (1997). There's self-help and then there's self-help: Women and the recovery movement. Social Policy, Spring, pp.56-61.
    • Rapping, E. (2001). The culture of recovery: Making sense of the self-help movement in women's lives. Boston: Beacon Press.
    • Rayner, G. & Warner, S., (2003). Self-harming behaviour: from lay perceptions to clinical practice. Counselling Psychology Quarterly, 16(4), pp.305-329.
    • Reece, J. (2005). The language of cutting: Initial reflections on a study of the experiences of self-injury in a group of women and nurses. Issues in Mental Health Nursing, 26(6), pp.561-574.
    • Riessman, F. & Carroll, D. (1995) Redefining self-help. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass Publishers.
    • Roberts, G. & Wolfson, P. (2004) The rediscovery of recovery: Open to all. Advances in Psychiatric Treatment, 10(1), pp.37-49.
    • Robson, C. (2011). Real world research: A resource for users of social research methods in applied settings. 3rd ed. Chichester: Wiley.
    • Rodham, K., Gavin, J. & Miles, M. (2007). I hear, I listen and I care: a qualitative investigation into the function of a self-harm message board. Suicide & Life Threatening Behaviour, 37(4), pp.422-430.
    • Royal College of Psychiatrists, (2010). Self-harm, suicide and risk: helping people who self-harm. London: Royal College of Psychiatrists.
    • Sabhlok, S.G. (2011) Development and women: The role of trust in self-help groups.
    • Indian Journal of Gender Studies, 18(2), pp.241-261.
    • Sanders, J.M. (2014). Women in Narcotics Anonymous: Overcoming stigma and shame.
    • Scholz, R.W. & Tietje, O. (2002). Embedded case study methods. London: Sage.
    • Scott, A., Doughty,C. & Kahi, H. (2011). 'Having those conversations': The politics of risk in peer support practices. Health Sociology Review, 20(2), pp. 187-201.
    • Schubert, M.A. & Borkman, T.J. (1991). An organizational typology for self help groups.
    • American Journal of Community Psychology, 19(5), pp.769-787.
    • Seebohm, P., Munn-Giddings, C. & Brewer, P. (2010). What's in a name? A discussion paper on the labels and location of self-organising community groups with particular reference to mental health and Black groups. Mental Health & Social Inclusion, 14(3), pp.23-29.
    • Seebohm, P., Chaudhary, S., Boyce, M., Elkan, R., Avis, M. & Munn-Giddings, C. (2013).
    • The contribution of self-help/mutual aid groups to mental well-being. Health & Social Care in the Community, 21(4), pp.391-402.
    • Selwyn, N. (2004). Reconsider political and popular understandings of the digital divide.
    • New Media & Society, 6(3), pp.341-362.
    • Seymour-Smith, S. (2008). “Blokes don't like that sort of thing”: Men's negotiation of a 'troubled' self-help group identity. Journal of Health Psychology, 13(6), pp.785-797.
    • Sharkey, V. (2003). Self-wounding: a literature review. Mental Health Practice, 6(7), pp.
    • Shaw, S.N. (2002). Shifting conversations on girls' and women's self-injury: An analysis of the clinical literature in historical context. Feminism & Psychology, 12(2), pp.191-219.
    • Shaw, C. & Shaw, T. (2007). A dialogue of hope and survival. In: H. Spandler and S.
    • Warner, eds. Beyond Fear and Control: Working with young people who self harm. Rosson-Wye: PCCS books. Ch.1.
    • Shaw, C. (2009). Steps. In: L. Cadman & J. Hoy, eds. Cutting the risk: Self harm minimisation in perspective - teaching and learning guidelines. National Self Harm Minimisation Group. p.6.
    • Shaw, C. (2012). Harm-minimisation for self-harm. Mental Health Today, September/October, pp.19-21.
    • Shaw, C. (2013a). “I do not believe in silence”: Self-harm and childhood sexual abuse. In C. Baker, C. Shaw & F. Biley, eds. Our encounters with self-harm. Ross-on-Wye: PCCS Books. Ch.20.
    • Shaw, C. (2013b). Living with scars. Asylum, 20(2), pp.4-6.
    • (1999). Continuum of professional involvement in self-help groups. Journal of Community Psychology, 27(1), pp.39-53.
    • Simons, H. (2009). Case study research in practice. London: Sage.
    • Simpson, A., (2006). Can mainstream health services provide meaningful care for people who self-harm: a critical reflection. Journal of Psychiatric and Mental Health Nursing, 13(4), pp.429-436.
    • Skegg, K., (2005). Self-harm. Lancet, 366(9495), pp.1471-1483.
    • Smiles, S. (2002). Self-help. Oxford University Press.
    • Smith, A. & Clarke, J., (2003). Self-harm self help/support groups. London: Mental Health Foundation.
    • Smith, G., Cox, D. & Saradjian, J., (1998). Women and self-harm. London: Women's Press.
    • (2011). Membership and boundary maintenance on an online self-harm forum. Qualitative Health Research, 21(11), pp.1567-1575.
    • Sourbati, M. (2012). Disabling communications? A capabilities perspective on media access, social inclusion & communication policy. Media Culture & Society, 34(5), pp.571- 587.
    • Spandler, H. (1996). Who's hurting who? Young people, self-harm and suicide. 42nd Street.
    • Spandler, H. & Batsleer, J. (2000). Sparring Partners: Conflicts in the expression and treatment of self-harm. In: J. Batsleer and B. Humphries, eds. Welfare, Exclusion and Political Agency. London: Routledge. Ch.10.
    • Spandler, H. and Warner, S. (2007). Introduction. In H.Spandler & S. Warner, eds. 2007.
    • Spandler, H. & Stickley, T. (2011) No hope without compassion: The importance of compassion in recovery-focused mental health services. Journal of Mental Health, 20(6), pp.555-566.
    • Stake, R.E. (2005). Qualitative case studies. In N.K. Denzin & Y.S. Lincoln, (eds). The Sage handbook of qualitative research. 3rd ed. London: Sage. Ch. 17.
    • Straiton, M., Roen, K., Dieserud, G. & Hjelmeland, H. (2013). Pushing the boundaries: Understanding self-harm in a non-clinical population. Archives of Psychiatric Nursing, 27, pp. 78-83.
    • Strong, M. (2005). A bright red scream: Self-mutilation and the language of pain. London: Virago.
    • Sutton, J., (2007). Healing the hurt within. 3rd ed. Oxford: Pathways.
    • Taylor, V. (1996). Rock-a-by baby: Feminism, self-help and postpartum depression.
    • Taylor, B. (2003). Exploring the perspectives of men who self-harm. Learning in Health and Social Care, 2(2), pp.83-91.
    • Taylor, T.L., Hawton, K., Fortune, S. & Kapur, N. (2009). Attitudes towards clinical services among people who self-harm: systematic review. British Journal of Psychiatry, 194(2), pp.104-110.
    • Tew, J. (2005). Power relations, social order and mental distress. In J.Tew, ed. 2005.
    • Social perspectives in mental health: developing social models to understand and work with mental distress. London: Jessica Kingsley. Ch.4.
    • Tew, J., Ramon, S., Slade, M., Bird, V., Melton, J. & Le Boutillier, C. (2012). Social factors and recovery from mental health difficulties: A review of the evidence. British Journal of Social Work, 42(3), pp. 443-460.
    • The Roestone Collective. (2014). Safe Space" Towards a Reconceptualization. Antipode, 46(5), pp. 1346-1365.
    • Thomas, G. (2011). How to do your case study: A guide for students and researchers.
    • Townsend, E. (2014). Self-harm in young people. Evidence-Based Mental Health, 17(4), pp.97-99.
    • Turp, M., (2003). Hidden self-harm: narratives from psychotherapy. London: Jessica Kingsley Publishers.
    • Twigg, J. (2006). The body in health and social care. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
    • Van Der Avort, A. & Van Harberden, P. (1985). Helping self-help groups: A developing theory. Psychotherapy, 22(2), pp.269-272.
    • Verhaeghe, M. & Bracke, P. (2011). Stigma and trust among mental health service users.
    • Archives of Psychiatric Nursing, 25(4), pp.294-302.
    • Visram, N., Roberts, A., Seebohm, P., Boyce, M. & Chaudhary, S. (2012) The role of selfhelp groups in promoting well-being: experiences from a cancer group. Mental Health & Social Inclusion, 16(3), pp.139-146.
    • Whitlock, J.L., Powers, J.L. & Eckenrode, J. (2006). The virtual cutting edge: the internet and adolescent self-injury. Developmental Psychology, 42(3), pp.407-417.
    • Williams, F. (2004) Care, values and support in local self-help groups. Social Policy & Society, 3(4), pp.431-438.
    • Wilson, J. & Myers, J. (1998). Self help groups: Getting started, keeping going. London: R.A. Wilson.
    • Wilstrand, C., Lindgren, B.M., Gilje, F. & Olofsson, B. (2007). Being burdened and balancing boundaries: A qualitative study of nurses' experiences caring for patients who self-harm. Journal of Psychiatric & Mental Health Nursing, 14(1), pp.72-78.
    • Wilton, T. (1995) Madness and feminism: Bristol Crisis Service for Women. In G. Griffin, ed. Feminist Activism in the 1990s, London: Taylor & Francis. Ch.2.
    • Wituk, S., Shepherd, M., Warren, M. & Meissen, G. (2002). Factors contributing to the survival of self-help groups. American Journal of Community Psychology, 30(3), pp.349- 366.
    • Wright, S. (2004). Self-help groups. London: Mental Health Foundation.
    • Yalom, I.D. (2005). The theory and practice of group psychotherapy. New York: Basic Books.
    • Yin, R.K. (2014). Case study research: Design and methods. 5th ed. London: Sage.
  • No related research data.
  • No similar publications.

Share - Bookmark

Cite this article