LOGIN TO YOUR ACCOUNT

Username
Password
Remember Me
Or use your Academic/Social account:

CREATE AN ACCOUNT

Or use your Academic/Social account:

Congratulations!

You have just completed your registration at OpenAire.

Before you can login to the site, you will need to activate your account. An e-mail will be sent to you with the proper instructions.

Important!

Please note that this site is currently undergoing Beta testing.
Any new content you create is not guaranteed to be present to the final version of the site upon release.

Thank you for your patience,
OpenAire Dev Team.

Close This Message

CREATE AN ACCOUNT

Name:
Username:
Password:
Verify Password:
E-mail:
Verify E-mail:
*All Fields Are Required.
Please Verify You Are Human:
fbtwitterlinkedinvimeoflicker grey 14rssslideshare1
Publisher: Unipress
Languages: English
Types: Article
Subjects: LC, Z481, Z482
This paper will consider how teaching assistants’ (TAs’) roles are changing from the historical ‘mum’s army’ (Bach Kessler & Heron, 2006) of paint-pot washers, as some considered it pre-national curriculum, to the developing conception of the TA as a ‘paraprofessional’. Contemporary issues arising from the loosely defined current expectations of TAs’ wider pedagogical role will also be discussed. Consideration will be given to how and why managing behaviour has become an expectation and a necessity for TAs in their current deployment in schools, and why learning about managing behaviour differs for TAs and teachers. Additionally, the paper will reflect on the specific challenges facing TAs in managing behaviour. How TAs learn from each other in communities of practice, as well as from teachers and senior leaders, will be explored. Furthermore, how behaviour policies and policy implementation generally can influence TAs’ opportunities to promote their own learning will be reviewed.
  • The results below are discovered through our pilot algorithms. Let us know how we are doing!

    • Alborz, A., Pearson, D., Farrell, P. Howes, A. (2009) The impact of adult support staff on pupils and mainstream schools. London: DCSF.
    • Anderson, V & Finney, M. (2008) 'I'm a TA not a PA!', in Richards, G. & Armstrong, F. (eds) Key issues for teaching assistants: Working in diverse classrooms. London: Routledge, pp. 73-83.
    • Armstrong, F. (2008) 'Inclusive education', In Richards, G. & Armstrong, F. (eds) Key issues for teaching assistants: Working in diverse classrooms. London: Routledge, pp. 7-18.
    • Bach, S., Kessler, I. & Heron, P. (2006) 'Changing job boundaries and workforce reform: the case of teaching assistants', Industrial Relations Journal, 37(1), pp. 2-21.
    • Barkham, J, (2008) 'Suitable work for women? Roles, relationships and changing identities of “other adults” in the early years classroom', British Educational Research Journal, 34(6), pp.839-853.
    • BERA (2011) Ethical guidelines for educational research. Available at: https://www.bera.ac.uk (Accessed: 7 July 2014).
    • Bland, K. & Sleightholme, S. (2012) 'Researching the pupil voice: what makes a good teaching assistant?', Support for Learning, 27(4), pp.172-176.
    • Blatchford, P., Russell, A., Bassett, P., Brown, P. & Martin, C. (2004) 'The role and effects of teaching assistants in English primary schools (Years 4 to 6) 2000-2003. Results from the Class Size and Pupil-Adult Ratios (CSPAR) KS2 Project', British Educational Research Journal, 33(1), pp.5-26.
    • Blatchford, P., Russell, A. & Webster, R. (2012) Reassessing the impact of teaching assistants. Oxon: Routledge.
    • Blatchford, P., Russell, A. & Webster, R. (2016) Maximising the impact of teaching assistants: Guidance for school leaders and teachers (2nd ed). London: Routledge.
    • Bowers, T. (1997) 'Supporting special needs in the mainstream classroom: children's perceptions of the adult role', Child: Care, Health and Development, 23(3), pp.217-232.
    • Braun, V. & Clarke, V. (2013) Successful qualitative research: a guide for beginners. London: SAGE Publications Ltd.
    • Butt, R. & Lowe, K. (2011) 'Teaching assistants and class teachers: differing perceptions, role confusion and the benefits of skills-based training', International Journal of Inclusive Education, 16(2), pp.207-219.
    • Caelli, K., Ray, L. & Mill, J. (2003) '“Clear as mud”: Toward greater clarity in generic qualitative research', International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 2(2), pp.1-13.
    • Carr, W. (2000) 'Partisanship in educational research', Oxford Review of Education, 26(3-4), pp.437- 449.
    • Coburn, C. (2005) 'The role of non-system actors in the relationship between policy and practice: The case of reading instruction in California', Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 27(1), pp.23-52.
    • Coburn, C. & Stein, M. (2006) 'Communities of practice theory and the role of teacher professional community in policy implementation', in Honig, M. (ed) New directions in education policy implementation: Confronting complexity. Albany: State University of New York Press, pp.25- 47.
    • Cockroft, C. & Atkinson, C. (2015) 'Using the Wider Pedagogical Role model to establish learning support assistants' views about facilitators and barriers to effective practice', Support for Learning, 30(2), pp.88-104.
    • Collins, J. & Simco, N. (2006) 'Teaching assistants reflect: the way forward?' Reflective Practice, 7(2), pp.197-214.
    • Cremin, H., Thomas, G. & Vincett, K. (2003) 'Learning zones: an evaluation of three models for improving learning through teacher/teaching assistant teamwork', Support for Learning, 18(4), pp.154-161.
    • Datnow, A. & Castellano, M. (2000) 'Teachers' responses to Success for All: how beliefs, experiences, and adaptations shape implementation', American Educational Research Journal, 37(3), pp.775 - 799.
    • Datnow, A. & Stringfield, S. (2000) 'Working together for reliable school reform', Journal of Education for Students Placed at Risk, 5(1-2), pp.183-204.
    • Department for Education and Employment. (1997) Excellence in schools. White paper. 3681. London: DfEE.
    • Department for Education and Skills (2002) Developing the role of school support staff The Consultation. London: DfES.
    • Department for Education and Skills. (2003) Developing the role of support staff - what the National Agreement means for you. London: DfES.
    • Department for Education and Skills. (2009) Learning behaviour: The report of the practitioners group on school behaviour and discipline. (Chairman: Sir Alan Steer) London: DfES.
    • Department for Education. (2013) Behaviour and discipline in Schools: Guidance for governing bodies. London: DfE
    • Department for Education. (2014) Behaviour and discipline in schools. London: DfE
    • Department for Education. (2016) Behaviour and discipline in schools: Advice for headteachers and school staff. London: DfE.
    • Devecchi, C. (2005) 'Teacher and TAs working together in a secondary school: should we be critical?'. British Education Research Association Annual Conference. University of Glamorgan, Pontypridd, 14-17 September. http://www.leeds.ac.uk/educol/documents/170933.doc
    • Devecchi, C. & Rouse, M. (2010) 'An exploration of the features of effective collaboration between teachers and teaching assistants in secondary schools', Support for Learning, 25(2), pp.91-99.
    • Devecchi, C. Dettori, F., Doveston, M., Sedgwick, P. & Jament, J. (2011) 'Inclusive classrooms in Italy and England: The role of support teachers and teaching assistants', European Journal of Special Needs Education, 27(2), pp.171-184.
    • Dunne, L., Goddard, G. & Woolhouse, C. (2008) 'Teaching assistants' perceptions of their professional role and their experiences of doing a foundation degree', Improving Schools, 11(3), pp.239-249.
    • Fraser, C. & Meadows, S. (2008) 'Children's views of Teaching Assistants in primary schools', Education 3-13, 36(4), pp.351-363.
    • Galton, M. & MacBeath, J. (2008) Teachers under pressure. London: SAGE Publications Ltd.
    • Galvin, P. & Costa, P. (1995) 'Building better behaved schools: effective support at the whole school level', in Gray, P., Miller, A. & Noakes, J. (eds) Challenging behaviour In schools. London: Routledge
    • Gerschel, L. (2005) 'The special educational needs coordinator's role in managing teaching assistants: the Greenwich perspective', Support for Learning, 20(2), pp.69-76.
    • Giangreco, M., Suter, J. C., & Doyle, M. (2010) 'Paraprofessionals in inclusive schools: A review of recent research', Journal of Educational and Psychological Consultation, 20(1), pp.41-57.
    • Graves, S. (2011) 'Performance or enactment? The role of the higher level teaching assistant in a remodelled school workforce in England', Management in Education, 25(1), pp.15-20.
    • Graves, S. (2012) 'Chameleon or chimera? The role of the Higher Level Teaching Assistant (HLTA) in a remodelled workforce in English schools', Educational Management Administration & Leadership, 41(1), pp.95-104.
    • Graves, S. (2013) 'New roles, old stereotypes - developing a school workforce in English schools', School Leadership & Management, 34(3), pp.255-268.
    • Griffiths, M. (1998) Educational research for social justice: Getting off the fence. Buckingham: Open University Press.
    • Groom, B. & Rose, R. (2005) 'Supporting the inclusion of pupils with social, emotional and behavioural difficulties in the primary school: the role of teaching assistants', Journal of Research in Special Educational Needs, 5(1), pp.20-30.
    • Groom, B. (2006) 'Building relationships for learning: the developing role of the teaching assistant', Support for Learning, 21(4), pp.199-203.
    • Hamilton, L. & Corbett-Whittier, C. (2013) Using case study in education research. London: SAGE Publications Ltd.
    • Hammersley-Fletcher, L. & Adnett, N. (2009) 'Empowerment or Prescription? Workforce Remodelling at the National and School Level', Educational Management Administration & Leadership, 37(2), pp.180-197.
    • Hammersley‐Fletcher, L. & Qualter, A. (2009) 'Chasing improved pupil performance: the impact of policy change on school educators' perceptions of their professional identity, the case of further change in English schools', British Educational Research Journal, 36(6), pp.903-917.
    • Hancock, R., Hall, T., Cable, C. & Eyres, I. (2010) '“They call me wonder woman”: the job jurisdictions and work-related learning of higher level teaching assistants', Cambridge Journal of Education, 40(2), pp. 97-112.
    • Her Majesty's Inspectorate. (2002) Teaching assistants in primary schools an evaluation of the quality and impact of their work. London: HMI
    • Howes, A. (2003) 'Teaching reforms and the impact of paid adult support on participation and learning in mainstream schools', Support for Learning, 18(4), pp.147-153.
    • Jennings, N. (1996) Interpreting policy in real classrooms: case studies of state reform and teacher practice. New York: Teachers College Press.
    • Johnson, M., Long, T. & White, A. (2008) 'Arguments for “British Pluralism” in qualitative health research', Journal of Advanced Nursing, 33(2), pp.243-249.
    • Kerry, T. (2005) 'Towards a typology for conceptualizing the roles of teaching assistants', Educational Review, 57(3), pp.373-384.
    • Kitzinger, J. (1995) 'Qualitative research: Introducing focus groups', British Medical Journal (Clinical research ed.), 311(7000), pp.299
    • Letherby, G. (2003) Feminist research in theory and practice. Buckingham: Open University Press.
    • Lewis, R. (1999) 'Teachers' support for inclusive forms of classroom management', International Journal of Inclusive Education, 3(3), pp.269-285.
    • Lumsden, K. (2012) '“You are what you research”: researcher partisanship and the sociology of the “underdog”', Qualitative Research, 13(1), pp.3-18.
    • Mackenzie, S. (2011) '“Yes, but...”: Rhetoric, reality and resistance in teaching assistants' experiences of inclusive education', Support for Learning, 26, pp.64-71.
    • Maguire, M., Ball, S. & Braun, A. (2010) 'Behaviour, classroom management and student “control”: enacting policy in the English secondary school', International Studies in Sociology of Education, 20(2), pp.153-170.
    • Mansaray, A. (2006) 'Liminality and in/exclusion: exploring the work of teaching assistants', Pedagogy, Culture & Society, 14(2), pp.171-187.
    • McLaughlin, M. (1991) 'Learning lessons from experience: Lessons from policy implementation', in Odden, A. (ed) Educational policy implementation. Albany: State University of New York Press, pp.185 - 195.
    • Moran, A. & Abbott, L. (2002) 'Developing inclusive schools: the pivotal role of teaching assistants in promoting inclusion in special and mainstream schools in Northern Ireland', European Journal of Special Needs Education, 17(2), pp.161-173.
    • Morgan, D. (1997) Focus groups as qualitative research (Qualitative research methods) Second Edition. London: Sage University Paper.
    • O'Brien, T. & Garner, P. (2002) 'Tim and Philip's story: setting the record straight', in O'Brien, T. & Garner, P. (eds) Untold stories - Learning support assistants and their work. Stoke on Trent: Trentham Books Ltd.
    • Ofsted. (2014) Below the radar: low-level disruption in the country's classrooms. Her Majesty's Chief Inspector's Annual Report, (September), pp.5-18.
    • Punch, K. & Oancea, A. (2014) Introduction to research methods in education, Second edition, London: SAGE Publications Ltd.
    • Quicke, J. (2003) 'Teaching assistants: students or servants?', FORUM, 45(2), pp.71-74.
    • Radford, J., Bosanquet, P., Webster, R. & Blatchford, P. (2015) 'Scaffolding learning for independence: Clarifying teacher and teaching assistant roles for children with special educational needs', Learning and Instruction, 36, pp.1-10.
    • Rubie-Davies, C., Blatchford, P., Webster, R., Koutsoubou, M. & Bassett, P. (2010) 'Enhancing learning? A comparison of teacher and teaching assistant interactions with pupils', School Effectiveness and School Improvement, 21(4), pp.429-449.
    • Russell, A., Webster, R. & Blatchford, P. (2013) Maximising the impact of Teaching Assistants. London: Routledge.
    • Sandelowski, M. (2000) 'Whatever happened to qualitative description?', Research in Nursing & Health, 23, pp.334-340.
    • Savin-Baden, M. & Major, C.H. (2013) Qualitative research: The essential guide to theory and practice. London: Routledge.
    • Sharples, J., Webster, R. & Blatchford, P. (2015) Making best use of teaching assistants: Guidance report. London: Education Endowment Foundation.
    • Sim, J. (1998) 'Collecting and analysing qualitative data: issues raised by the focus group', Journal of Advanced Nursing, 28(2), pp.345-352.
    • Sink, D. (1983) 'Using the nominal group technique effectively', National Productivity Review, 2(2), pp.173-184.
    • Smith, P., Whitby, K., and Sharp, C. (2004) The employment and deployment of teaching assistants. Slough: NFER.
    • Smylie, M. & Evans, A. (2006) 'Social capital and the problem of implementation', in Honig, M. (ed) New directions in education policy implementation: Confronting complexity. Albany: State University of New York Press, pp.187-208.
    • Spillane, J., Reiser, B. & Reimer, T. (2002) 'Policy implementation and cognition: reframing and refocusing implementation research', Review of Educational Research, 72(3), pp.387-431.
    • Spillane, J., Reiser, B. & Gomez, L. (2006) 'Policy implementation and cognition: the role of human, social and distributed cognition in framing policy implementation', in Honig, M. (ed) New directions in education policy implementation: Confronting complexity. Albany: State University of New York Press, pp.47-64.
    • Symes, W. & Humphrey, N. (2011) 'The deployment, training and teacher relationships of teaching assistants supporting pupils with autistic spectrum disorders (ASD) in mainstream secondary schools', British Journal of Special Education, 38(2), pp.57-64.
    • Taylor, C. (2011) Good behaviour in schools: checklist for teachers. Available at: https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/good-behaviour-in-schools-checklist-forteachers (Accessed 11 October 2015).
    • Thomas, G. (1992) Effective classroom teamwork: support or intrusion? London: Routledge.
    • Thomas, G. & Loxley, A. (2001) Deconstructing special education and constructing inclusion. Buckingham: Open University Press.
    • Tucker, S. (2009) 'Perceptions and reflections on the role of the teaching assistant in the classroom environment', Pastoral Care in Education, 27(4), pp.291-300.
    • Visser, J. (2007) 'Social, emotional and behavioural difficulties: can mainstream schools meet these pupils needs?', ENSEC Conference. Malta. Available at: http://enseceurope.org/files/papers/Social%20Emotional%20and%20Behavioural%20Difficulti es%20Can%20%20Mainstream%20-Schools%20meet%20these%20Pupils%20Needs.doc (Accessed: 3 Dec 2014).
    • Webster, R., Blatchford, P., Bassett, P., Brown, P., Martin, C. & Russell, A. (2011) 'The wider pedagogical role of teaching assistants', School Leadership & Management, 31(1), pp.3-20.
    • Webster, R., Blatchford, P. & Russell, A. (2012) 'Challenging and changing how schools use teaching assistants: findings from the Effective Deployment of Teaching Assistants project', School Leadership & Management, 33(1), pp.78-96.
    • Webster, R. & Blatchford, P. (2013) The making a statement project final report. A study of the teaching and support experienced by pupils with a statement of special educational needs in mainstream primary schools. London: Institute of Education.
    • Wenger, E. (1999) Communities of practice: learning, meaning and identity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    • Whittaker, J. & Kikabhai, N. (2008) 'How schools create challenging behaviours', in Richards, G. & Armstrong, F. (eds) Key issues for teaching assistants: Working in diverse classrooms. London: Routledge, pp.120-130.
  • No related research data.
  • No similar publications.

Share - Bookmark

Cite this article