Remember Me
Or use your Academic/Social account:


Or use your Academic/Social account:


You have just completed your registration at OpenAire.

Before you can login to the site, you will need to activate your account. An e-mail will be sent to you with the proper instructions.


Please note that this site is currently undergoing Beta testing.
Any new content you create is not guaranteed to be present to the final version of the site upon release.

Thank you for your patience,
OpenAire Dev Team.

Close This Message


Verify Password:
Verify E-mail:
*All Fields Are Required.
Please Verify You Are Human:
fbtwitterlinkedinvimeoflicker grey 14rssslideshare1
Selfe, M. (2012)
Publisher: Edinburgh University Press
Languages: English
Types: Article
This article revisits the period considered within ‘The Quality Film Adventure: British Critics and the Cinema 1942-1948’, mapping the professional cultures, working contexts and industry relationships that underpinned the aesthetic judgements and collective directions which John Ellis has observed within the critics published writings. Drawing on the records of the Critics’ Circle, Dilys Powell’s papers and Kinematograph Weekly, it explores the evolution of increasingly organised professional cultures of film criticism and film publicity, arguing that the material conditions imposed by war caused tensions between them to escalate. In the context of two major challenges to critical integrity and practice – the evidence given by British producer R.J. Minney in front of the 1948 Royal Commission on the Press and an ongoing libel case between a BBC critic and MGM – the different spaces of hospitality and film promotion became highly contested sites. This article focuses on the ways in which these spaces were characterised, used, and policed. It finds that the value and purpose of press screenings were hotly disputed and observes the way the advancement of women within one sector (film criticism) but not the other (film publicity) created particular difficulties, as key female critics avoided the more compromised masculine spaces of publicity, making them harder for publicists to reach and fuelling trade resentment. More broadly, the article asserts the need to consider film critics as geographically and culturally located audiences, who experience films as ‘professional’ viewers within extended and embodied cultures of habitual professional practice and physical space.
  • The results below are discovered through our pilot algorithms. Let us know how we are doing!

    • Agate, James (1946), Around Cinemas, London: Home and Van Thal.
    • Bell, Melanie (2010), “'Quality'', cinema and the “superior woman'' persona: understanding women's film criticism in post-war Britain (1945-59)', Women's History Review, 19: 5, pp. 703-19.
    • Bell, Melanie (2011), 'Film criticism as “women's work'': the gendered economy of film criticism in Britain, 1945-65', Historical Journal of Film, Radio and Television, 31: 2, pp. 191-209.
    • Betts, Ernest (1960), Inside Pictures, London: Cresset Press.
    • Chapman, James, Mark Glancy and Sue Harper (eds) (2007), The New Film History, Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
    • Danischewsky, Monja (1966), White Russian - Red Face, London: Victor Gollancz.
    • Ellis, John, (1996), 'The quality film adventure: British critics and the cinema 1942-1948', revised version in Andrew Higson (ed.), Dissolving Views: Key Writings on British Cinema, London, Cassell, pp. 66-93.
    • Greene, Graham (1936), 'Is it criticism?', Sight and Sound, Autumn, pp. 64-5.
    • Powell, Dilys (1989), The Golden Screen: Fifty Years of Films, London: Pavilion.
    • Royal Commission on the Press (1949), Minutes of Evidence Taken Before the Royal Commission on the Press, Tenth Day, 27 November 1947 (Cmd. 7369).
    • Royal Commission on the Press (1949), Thirty-fifth Day, 26 May 1948 (Cmd. 7500).
    • Royal Commission on the Press (1949), Thirty-eighth Day, 10 June 1948 (Cmd. 7512).
    • Selfe, Melanie (2007), 'The Role of Film Societies in the Presentation and Mediation of “Cultural'' Film in Post-war Nottingham', unpublished PhD thesis, University of East Anglia.
    • Selfe, Melanie (2011), “'Intolerable flippancy'': The Arnot Robertson v MGM libel case (1946-1950) and the evolution of BBC policy on broadcast film criticism', Historical Journal of Film, Radio and Television, 31: 3, pp. 373-98.
    • Stockwood, Jane (1948), 'Four critics', Harper's Bazaar, May, pp. 51-74.
    • Wood, E. M. (1947), 'C.A. Lejeune - film critic', Leader Magazine, 11 January, pp. 14-17.
  • No related research data.
  • No similar publications.

Share - Bookmark

Cite this article