Remember Me
Or use your Academic/Social account:


Or use your Academic/Social account:


You have just completed your registration at OpenAire.

Before you can login to the site, you will need to activate your account. An e-mail will be sent to you with the proper instructions.


Please note that this site is currently undergoing Beta testing.
Any new content you create is not guaranteed to be present to the final version of the site upon release.

Thank you for your patience,
OpenAire Dev Team.

Close This Message


Verify Password:
Verify E-mail:
*All Fields Are Required.
Please Verify You Are Human:
fbtwitterlinkedinvimeoflicker grey 14rssslideshare1
Boyer, Kate (2014)
Publisher: SAGE Publications
Languages: English
Types: Article
Subjects: HM, AZ, H1, HQ, JC, G1, B1
Through an analysis of policy texts, population statistics and a targeted sample from the popular press, this paper both furthers knowledge about changing meanings of working motherhood in the contemporary US, and proposes a refinement to existing conceptual work relating to how wage-work and care-work are combined. I focus analysis on recent US social policy which grants new rights and protections for women seeking to combine lactation and wage-work (the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act of 2011). I critique this policy through Bernise Hausman’s work on the politics of motherhood, arguing that it represents a form of work-life integration that is particularly burdensome for working mothers. I further argue that maternal practice as well as well as expectations of working motherhood in the contemporary US are being reshaped around the demands of neoliberalism, producing what I term ‘neoliberal motherhood’. I assert that this policy represents a way of combining wage-work and care-work that is not captured within existing feminist theory, and suggest that a re-working of theory in this area is needed in order to address cases in which embodied care-work is enfolded within the time and space of wage-work.
  • The results below are discovered through our pilot algorithms. Let us know how we are doing!

    • Payne D, Nichols D (2009) Managing breastfeeding and work: a Foucauldian secondary analysis.
    • Journal of Advanced Nursing 66 (8): 1810-1818.
    • Rancière J (2010) Dissensus: on politics and aesthetics. London: Continuum.
    • Rasmussen K and Geraghty SR (2011) The Quiet Revolution: Breastfeeding Transformed With the Use of Breast Pumps . American Journal of Public Health 101 (8): 1356-1359.
    • Rose N (1999) Powers of Freedom: Reframing political thought. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    • Reiger, K, Garvan, J and Teel, “ 'ethikig Cae: a itial aalsis of fail poliies ad the negotiation of depede. Just Policy, 50.
    • 'eige, K The eolieal uikstep: otaditios i Austalia ateit ae poli Sociology Review, Special Issue, Childbirth, Politics and the Culture of Risk 15(4): 330-340.
    • Van Esterik P (1996) Expressing ourselves: Breast pumps . Journal of Human Lactation 12(4): 273- 274.
    • Warner J (2009) Ban the Breastpump The New York Times, 2 April http://opinionator.blogs.nytimes.com/2009/04/02/why-i-dumped-the-pump/ Accessed 12 Sept, 2012.
    • Weir A (2005) Global Universal Caregiver . Constellations 12 (3): 308-330.
    • World Health Organization (2011) http://www.euro.who.int/en/what-we-do/health-topics/Lifestages/maternal-and-newborn-health/news/news/2011/01/exclusive-breastfeeding-for-six-monthsbest-for-babies-everywhere Accessed 20 August 2012.
  • No related research data.
  • No similar publications.

Share - Bookmark

Cite this article