Remember Me
Or use your Academic/Social account:


Or use your Academic/Social account:


You have just completed your registration at OpenAire.

Before you can login to the site, you will need to activate your account. An e-mail will be sent to you with the proper instructions.


Please note that this site is currently undergoing Beta testing.
Any new content you create is not guaranteed to be present to the final version of the site upon release.

Thank you for your patience,
OpenAire Dev Team.

Close This Message


Verify Password:
Verify E-mail:
*All Fields Are Required.
Please Verify You Are Human:
fbtwitterlinkedinvimeoflicker grey 14rssslideshare1
Van Dam, Nicholas T.; Brown, Anna; Mole, Tom B.; Davis, Jake H.; Britton, Willoughby B.; Brewer, Judson A. (2015)
Publisher: Public Library of Science
Journal: PLoS ONE
Languages: English
Types: Article
Subjects: Q, R, Research Article, BF, Science, Medicine
At a fundamental level, taxonomy of behavior and behavioral tendencies can be described\ud in terms of approach, avoid, or equivocate (i.e., neither approach nor avoid). While there are\ud numerous theories of personality, temperament, and character, few seem to take advantage\ud of parsimonious taxonomy. The present study sought to implement this taxonomy by\ud creating a questionnaire based on a categorization of behavioral temperaments/tendencies\ud first identified in Buddhist accounts over fifteen hundred years ago. Items were developed\ud using historical and contemporary texts of the behavioral temperaments, described as\ud “Greedy/Faithful”, “Aversive/Discerning”, and “Deluded/Speculative”. To both maintain\ud this categorical typology and benefit from the advantageous properties of forced-choice\ud response format (e.g., reduction of response biases), binary pairwise preferences for items\ud were modeled using Latent Class Analysis (LCA). One sample (n1 = 394) was used to estimate\ud the item parameters, and the second sample (n2 = 504) was used to classify the participants\ud using the established parameters and cross-validate the classification against\ud multiple other measures. The cross-validated measure exhibited good nomothetic span\ud (construct-consistent relationships with related measures) that seemed to corroborate the\ud ideas present in the original Buddhist source documents. The final 13-block questionnaire\ud created from the best performing items (the Behavioral Tendencies Questionnaire or BTQ)\ud is a psychometrically valid questionnaire that is historically consistent, based in behavioral\ud tendencies, and promises practical and clinical utility particularly in settings that teach and\ud study meditation practices such as Mindfulness Based Stress Reduction (MBSR).

Share - Bookmark

Cite this article