Remember Me
Or use your Academic/Social account:


Or use your Academic/Social account:


You have just completed your registration at OpenAire.

Before you can login to the site, you will need to activate your account. An e-mail will be sent to you with the proper instructions.


Please note that this site is currently undergoing Beta testing.
Any new content you create is not guaranteed to be present to the final version of the site upon release.

Thank you for your patience,
OpenAire Dev Team.

Close This Message


Verify Password:
Verify E-mail:
*All Fields Are Required.
Please Verify You Are Human:
fbtwitterlinkedinvimeoflicker grey 14rssslideshare1
Roberts, Louise (2015)
Publisher: Elsevier
Languages: English
Types: Article
Subjects: HN, HQ
This article is concerned with the experiences and perspectives of eleven children engaged with a family support service in England and Wales, UK. Support care is a short break provision for children, designed to ease family tensions and prevent long-term separation. Children and young people are most affected by families' involvement with the service as they have to spend regular periods away from their parents and home. The article is based on findings from a qualitative case study of support care. Eighty-two qualitative interviews and 22 h of participant observation were undertaken with children and young people, parents, support carers and social workers. Children's experiences of support care are examined within the article and this includes consideration of initial engagement with the service, the delivery of care and the relationships established with carers over the course of the intervention. Some practice tensions are highlighted in efforts to support children as well as maintain emphasis on family-focussed objectives. It is argued that the service specific issues raised have wider relevance for family support and social work policy and practice.
  • The results below are discovered through our pilot algorithms. Let us know how we are doing!

    • Aldgate, J. and Bradley, M. (1999). Supporting Families through Short-term Fostering. London: The Stationary Office.
    • Broadhurst, K., White, S., Fish, S., Munro, E., Fletcher, K. and Lincoln, H. (2010). Ten pitfalls and how to avoid them: What research tells us. Retrieved from http://www.nspcc.org.uk/inform/publications/downloads/tenpitfalls_wdf48122.pdf .
    • Clark, A., McQuail, S. and Moss, P. (2003). Exploring the Field of Listening to and Consulting with Young Children. Retrieved from http://www.education.gov.uk/publications/eOrderingDownload/RR445.doc
    • Cocks, A. (2006). The ethical maze: Finding an inclusive path towards gaining children's agreement to research participation. Childhood 13, 2, 247-266.
    • Hill, M. (1997). Participatory research with children. Child and Family Social Work 2, 3, 171-183.
    • HM Government. (2012). Social Justice: Transforming Lives. London: The Stationary Office.
    • Lansdown, G. (2009). The Realisation of Children Participation Rights: critical reflections'. In: Percy-Smith, B. and Thomas, N. (Eds). .A Handbook of Children and Young People's Participation: Perspectives from theory and practice. Oxon: Routledge, pp 11-23.
    • La Valle, I., Payne, L. and Jelicic, H. (2012). The voice of the child in the child protection system. Retrieved from http://www.ncb.org.uk/media/756988/research_summary_7.pdf
    • Morgan, D. (2011). Rethinking Family Practices. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
    • Morris, K. (2012). Thinking Family? The Complexities for Family Engagement in Care and Protection. British Journal of Social Work 42, 5, 906-920.
    • Morris, K. and Connolly, M. (2012). Family Decision Making in Child Welfare: Challenges in Developing a Knowledge Base for Practice. Child Abuse Review 21, 1, 41-52.
    • Morris, K., Hughes, N., Clarke, H., Tew, J., Mason, P., Galvani, S., Lewis, A., Loveless, L., Becker, S. and Burford, G. (2008). Think Family: A Literature Review of Whole Family Approaches. London: Cabinet Office.
    • Nursten, J. P. (1997). The End as a Means to Growth within the Social Work Relationship. Journal of Social Work Practice 11, 2, 73-80.
    • O'Kane, C. (2008). The Development of participatory techniques: Facilitating children's views about decisions which affect them. In: Christensen, P. A. and James, A. (Eds.) Research with children: perspectives and practices (2nd ed.) Abingdon: Routledge, pp125-155.
    • Parton, N. (2009). From Seebohm to Think Family: Reflections on 40 years of policy change of statutory children's social work in England. Child & Family Social Work 14, 1, 68- 78.
    • Roberts, P. and Priest H. (2010). Healthcare Research: A Textbook for Students and Practitioners. Chichester: Wiley Blackwell.
    • Robertson, J., Hatton, C., Wells, E., Collins, M., Langer, S., Welch, V. and Emerson, E. (2011). The Impacts of short break provision on families with a disabled child: an international literature review. Health and Social Care in the Community 19, 4, 337- 371.
    • Rubin, H. J. and Rubin, I. S. (1995). Qualitative Interviewing: The art of hearing data. London: Sage.
    • Seale, C. (2004). Coding and Analysing Data. In: Seale, C. (Ed.) Researching Society and Culture (2nd ed.). London: Sage, pp 305-323.
    • Smart, C. (2007). Personal Life. Cambridge: Polity Press.
    • Swallow, V., Forrester, T. and Macfadyen, A. (2012). Teenagers' and parents' views on a short-break service for children with life-limiting conditions: a qualitative study. Palliative Medicine 26, 3, 257-267.
    • Tarleton, B. (2003). Committed to Caring: Family-based short-break carers' views of their role. Adoption & Fostering 27, 1, 36-46.
    • Wager, F., Hill, M., Bailey, N., Day, R., Hamilton, D. and King, C. (2010). The Impact of Poverty on Children and Young People's Use of Services. Children & Society 24, 5, 400-412.
    • Welsh Assembly Government. (2011). Child Poverty Strategy for Wales. WWW. . Accessed 28.3.13.
  • No related research data.
  • No similar publications.

Share - Bookmark

Cite this article