LOGIN TO YOUR ACCOUNT

Username
Password
Remember Me
Or use your Academic/Social account:

CREATE AN ACCOUNT

Or use your Academic/Social account:

Congratulations!

You have just completed your registration at OpenAire.

Before you can login to the site, you will need to activate your account. An e-mail will be sent to you with the proper instructions.

Important!

Please note that this site is currently undergoing Beta testing.
Any new content you create is not guaranteed to be present to the final version of the site upon release.

Thank you for your patience,
OpenAire Dev Team.

Close This Message

CREATE AN ACCOUNT

Name:
Username:
Password:
Verify Password:
E-mail:
Verify E-mail:
*All Fields Are Required.
Please Verify You Are Human:
fbtwitterlinkedinvimeoflicker grey 14rssslideshare1
Languages: English
Types: Doctoral thesis
Subjects: H1
There were two distinct aims of this research study; firstly, to gain a greater understanding of nursing documentation practice, and, secondly, to study the management of change within a health care setting. The importance of creating high quality nursing documents for the purposes of recording patient care is well emphasised within the published work of key health care figures, such as the Nursing and Midwifery Council (2010) and the Health Service Ombudsman (2006); however the necessary guidance to achieve such high quality documents appears to be lacking. Previous studies have been inconclusive in diagnosing the root causes of nursing documentation issues, and consequently, recommendations for improvement have largely involved the redesign of a single document, which have often failed to address the underlying problem. Collectively, the inconsistencies within the literature marked the need to undertake further research, in order to thoroughly investigate nursing documentation practice and to better understand the organisational and cultural barriers to the successful implementation of change within the NHS.\ud \ud The research took a case study approach which involved an investigation of nursing documentation practice and organisational change within a single organisational setting. A two phase methodology was developed in order to collect sufficient levels of data to form research findings. Firstly, an analysis of 161 documents provided a degree of quantitative data to gain a greater understanding of the standard of nursing documents in use within the case study organisation. This was followed by eleven semi-structured interviews and a focus group in addition to the use of a diary log, kept by the researcher, to record key observations over a two year period.\ud \ud The main findings provided evidence of a lack of formalised procedure for the development and management of nursing documentation within the case study organisation. Authors of nursing documents did not always see their role as „educators‟, however a number of nurses interviewed within the purposes of the research voiced concerns in relation to a lack of understanding, and, when tested, gave differing responses and interpretations as to the meaning of some of the assessments contained within key nursing documents.\ud \ud Whilst an improvement model was developed to address some of the issues encountered throughout the research, strong messages emerge in relation to the successful management and implementation of change within a health care setting. A perceived cynicism of change in addition to the entrenchment of routines and procedures were key defence mechanisms used by the nursing workforce.
  • The results below are discovered through our pilot algorithms. Let us know how we are doing!

    • Alexis, O (2005). Managing Change: Cultural diversity in the NHS Workforce. Nursing Management. Volume 11 Issue 10.
    • Allen D (1998). Record-keeping and routine nursing practice: the view from the wards. Journal of Advanced Nursing. Volume 27 Clemow R. (2006). Care plans as the main focus of nursing handover: information exchange model. Journal of Clinical Nursing. Volume 15 Issue 11.
    • Connor, P; Lake, L (1994). Managing organizational change. London: Praeger.
  • No related research data.
  • No similar publications.

Share - Bookmark

Cite this article