Remember Me
Or use your Academic/Social account:


Or use your Academic/Social account:


You have just completed your registration at OpenAire.

Before you can login to the site, you will need to activate your account. An e-mail will be sent to you with the proper instructions.


Please note that this site is currently undergoing Beta testing.
Any new content you create is not guaranteed to be present to the final version of the site upon release.

Thank you for your patience,
OpenAire Dev Team.

Close This Message


Verify Password:
Verify E-mail:
*All Fields Are Required.
Please Verify You Are Human:
fbtwitterlinkedinvimeoflicker grey 14rssslideshare1
Publisher: Elsevier
Languages: English
Types: Article
This paper presents an extended experimental study on the bond behaviour between textile-reinforced mortar (TRM) and concrete substrates. The parameters examined include: (a) the bond length (from 50 mm to 450 mm); (b) the number of TRM layers (from one to four); (c) the concrete surface preparation (grinding versus sandblasting); (d) the concrete compressive strength (15 MPa or 30 MPa); (e) the textile coating; and (f) the anchorage through wrapping with TRM jackets. For this purpose, a total of 80 specimens were fabricated and tested under double-lap direct shear. It is mainly concluded that: (a) after a certain bond length (between 200 mm and 300 mm for any number of layers) the bond strength marginally increases; (b) by increasing the number of layers the bond capacity increases in a non-proportional way, whereas the failure mode is altered; (c) concrete sandblasting is equivalent to grinding in terms of bond capacity and failure mode; (d) concrete compressive strength has a marginal effect on the bond capacity; (e) the use of coated textiles alters the failure mode and significantly increases the bond strength; and (f) anchorage of TRM through wrapping with TRM jackets substantially increases the ultimate load capacity.
  • The results below are discovered through our pilot algorithms. Let us know how we are doing!

    • [1] Triantafillou TC, Papanicolaou CG, Zissimopoulos P, Laourdekis T. Concrete confinement with textile-reinforced mortar jackets. ACI Struct J 2006;103(1): 28e37.
    • [2] Bournas DA, Lontou PV, Papanicolaou CG, Triantafillou TC. Textile-reinforced mortar versus fiber-reinforced polymer confinement in reinforced concrete columns. ACI Struct J 2007;104(6).
    • [3] Carloni C, Bournas DA, Carozzi FG, D'Antino T, Fava G, Focacci F, et al. “Fiber reinforced composites with cementitious (inorganic) matrix”, Chapter 9. In: Pellegrino C, Sena-Cruz J, editors. Design procedures for the use of composites in strengthening of reinforced concrete structures e State of the art report of the RILEM TC 234-DUC. Springer, RILEM STAR Book Series; 2015. p. 349e91.
    • [4] Brückner A, Ortlepp R, Curbach M. Textile reinforced concrete for strengthening in bending and shear. Mater Struct 2006;39(8):741e8.
    • [5] D' Ambrisi A, Focacci F. Flexural strengthening of RC beams with cementbased composites. J Comp Constr 2011;15(5):707e20.
    • [6] Loreto G, Leardini L, Arboleda D, Nanni A. Performance of RC slab-type elements strengthened with fabric-reinforced cementitious-matrix composites. J Comp Constr 2013;18(3):A4013003. http://dx.doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE) CC.1943-5614.0000415. 2014.
    • [7] Koutas LN, Bournas DA. Flexural strengthening of two-way RC slabs with textile-reinforced mortar: experimental investigation and design equations. J Compos Constr 2016. http://dx.doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)CC.1943- 5614.0000713.
    • [8] Azam R, Soudki K. FRCM strengthening of shear-critical RC beams. J Comp Constr 2014;18(5):04014012. http://dx.doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)CC.1943- 5614.0000464.
    • [9] Tzoura E, Triantafillou TC. Shear strengthening of reinforced concrete T-beams under cyclic loading with TRM or FRP jackets. Mater Struct 2014. http:// dx.doi.org/10.1617/s11527-014-0470-9.
    • [10] Tetta ZC, Koutas LN, Bournas DA. Textile-reinforced mortar (TRM) versus fiber-reinforced polymers (FRP) in shear strengthening of concrete beams. Comps Part B 2015;77:338e48.
    • [11] Tetta ZC, Koutas LN, Bournas DA. Shear strengthening of full-scale RC T-beams using textile-reinforced mortar and textile-based anchors. Comps Part B 2016;95:225e39.
    • [12] Ombres L, Verre S. Structural behaviour of fabric-reinforced cementitious matrix (FRCM) strengthened concrete columns under eccentric loading. Compos Part B 2015;75:235e49.
    • [13] Bournas DA, Triantafillou TC, Zygouris K, Stavropoulos F. Textile-reinforced mortar versus FRP jacketing in seismic retrofitting of RC columns with continuous or lap-spliced deformed bars. J Compos Constr 2009;13(5): 360e71.
    • [14] Bournas DA, Triantafillou TC. Bond strength of lap-spliced bars in concrete confined with composite jackets. J Comp Constr 2011;15(2):156e67.
    • [15] Bournas DA, Triantafillou TC. Bar buckling in RC columns confined with composite materials. ASCE J Compos Constr 2011;15(3):393e403.
    • [16] Bournas DA, Triantafillou TC. Biaxial bending of RC columns strengthened with externally applied reinforcement combined with confinement. ACI Struct J 2013;110(2):193e204.
    • [17] Koutas L, Bousias SN, Triantafillou TC. Seismic strengthening of masonryinfilled RC frames with TRM: experimental study. J Comp Constr 2015;19(2):04014048. http://dx.doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)CC.1943- 5614.0000507.
    • [18] Papanicolaou CG, Triantafillou TC, Karlos K, Papathanasiou M. Textile reinforced mortar (TRM) versus FRP as strengthening material of URM walls: outof-plane cyclic loading. Mater Struct 2007;41(1):143e57.
    • [19] Faella C, Martinelli E, Nigro E, Paciello S. Shear capacity of masonry walls externally strengthened by a cement-based composite material: an experimental campaign. Constr Build Mater 2010;24(1):84e93.
    • [20] D'Ambrisi A, Feo L, Focacci F. Experimental analysis on bond between PBOFRCM strengthening materials and concrete. Compos Part B 2013;44(1): 524e32.
    • [21] D'Antino T, Pellegrino C, Carloni C, Sneed LH, Giacomin G. Experimental analysis of the bond behavior of glass, carbon, and steel FRCM composites. Key Eng Mat 2014;624:371e8.
    • [22] Sneed LH, D'Antino T, Carloni C. Investigation of bond behavior of PBO fiberreinforced cementitious matrix composite-concrete interface. ACI Mater J 2014;111(1e6).
    • [23] Tran CT, Stitmannaithum B, Ueda T. Investigation of the bond behaviour between PBO-FRCM strengthening material and concrete. J Adv Conc Tech 2014;12(12):545e57.
    • [24] Awani O, El Refai A, El-Maaddawy T. Bond characteristics of carbon fabricreinforced cementitious matrix in double shear tests. Constr Build Mater 2015;101:39e49.
    • [25] D'Antino T, Sneed LH, Carloni C, Pellegrino C. Influence of the substrate characteristics on the bond behavior of PBO FRCM-concrete joints. Constr Build Mater 2015;30(101):838e50.
    • [26] Ombres L. Analysis of the bond between fabric reinforced cementitious mortar (FRCM) strengthening systems and concrete. Compos Part B 2015;28(69):418e26.
    • [27] Sneed LH, D'Antino T, Carloni C, Pellegrino C. A comparison of the bond behavior of PBO-FRCM composites determined by double-lap and single-lap shear tests. Cem Conc Compos 2015;64:37e48.
    • [28] EN 1015-11. Methods of test for mortar for masonry e Part 11: Determination of flexural and compressive strength of hardened mortar. Brussels: Comite Europeen de Normalisation; 1993.
    • [29] Serbescu A, Guadagnini M, Pilakoutas K. Standardised double-shear test for determining bond of FRP to concrete and corresponding model development. Compos Part B 2013;55:277e97.
    • [30] Raoof SM. Flexural strengthening of reinforced concrete beams with textile reinforced mortar (TRM). Department of Civil Engineering, The University of Nottingham; 2015. PhD annual report (2nd year).
    • [31] Yao J, Teng J, Chen J. Experimental study on FRP-to-concrete bonded joints. Compos Part B 2005;36(2):99e113.
  • No related research data.
  • Discovered through pilot similarity algorithms. Send us your feedback.

Share - Bookmark

Cite this article