Remember Me
Or use your Academic/Social account:


Or use your Academic/Social account:


You have just completed your registration at OpenAire.

Before you can login to the site, you will need to activate your account. An e-mail will be sent to you with the proper instructions.


Please note that this site is currently undergoing Beta testing.
Any new content you create is not guaranteed to be present to the final version of the site upon release.

Thank you for your patience,
OpenAire Dev Team.

Close This Message


Verify Password:
Verify E-mail:
*All Fields Are Required.
Please Verify You Are Human:
fbtwitterlinkedinvimeoflicker grey 14rssslideshare1
Languages: English
Types: Unknown
People can often find themselves out of their depth when they face knowledge-based problems, such as faulty technology, or medical concerns. This can also happen in everyday domains that users are simply inexperienced with, like cooking. These are common exploratory search conditions, where users don’t quite know enough about the domain to know if they are submitting a good query, nor if the results directly resolve their need or can be translated to do so. In such situations, people turn to their friends for help, or to forums like StackOverflow, so that someone can explain things to them and translate information to their specific need. This short paper describes work-in-progress within a Google-funded project focusing on Search Literacy in these situations, where improved search skills will help users to learn as they search, to search better, and to better comprehend the results. Focusing on the technology-problem domain, we present initial results from a qualitative study of questions asked and answers given in StackOverflow, and present plans for designing search engine support to help searchers learn as they search.
  • The results below are discovered through our pilot algorithms. Let us know how we are doing!

    • [2] Nicholas J. Belkin, Colleen Cool, Adelheit Stein, and Ulrich Thiel. (1995) Cases, scripts, and information-seeking strategies: On the design of interactive information retrieval systems. Expert systems with applications 9, no. 3: 379-395.
    • [3] Mikhail Bilenko and Ryen W. White. (2008) Mining the search trails of surfing crowds: identifying relevant websites from user activity. In Proc. WWW '08. ACM, New York, NY, USA, 51-60.
    • [4] Clark, Herbert H., and Susan E. Brennan. "Grounding in communication."Perspectives on socially shared cognition 13.1991 (1991): 127-149.
    • [5] Debora Donato, Francesco Bonchi, Tom Chi, and Yoelle Maarek. (2010) Do you want to take notes?: identifying research missions in Yahoo! search pad. In Proc. WWW '10. ACM, New York, NY, USA, 321-330.
    • [6] David Elsweiler, Max L. Wilson, and Brian Kirkegaard Lunn (2011), Chapter 9 Understanding Casual-Leisure Information Behaviour, in Amanda Spink, Jannica Heinström (ed.) New Directions in Information Behaviour, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, pp.211 - 241
    • [7] Susan R. Goldman. (2010). Literacy in the digital world: Comprehending and learning from multiple sources. In M.G. McKeown & L. Kucan (Eds.), Bringing reading research to life (pp. 257-284). New York: Guilford.
    • [8] R. Stuart Geiger and David Ribes, (2011), Trace Ethnography: Following Coordination through Documentary Practices, System Sciences (HICSS'11), Kauai, HI, pp. 1-10.
    • [9] Larry P. Heck, Dilek Hakkani-Tür, Madhu Chinthakunta, Gökhan Tür, Rukmini Iyer, Partha Parthasarathy, Lisa Stifelman, Elizabeth Shriberg, and Ashley Fidler. (2013). Multi-Modal Conversational Search and Browse. In SLAM@ INTERSPEECH, pp. 96-101.
    • [10] Jeon, Grace YoungJoo, and Soo Young Rieh. "Social search behavior in a social Q&A service: Goals, strategies, and outcomes." Proc ASIST 2015, 52.1 (2015): 1-10.
    • [11] William A. Katz, (2002) Introduction to Reference Work. Boston: McGraw-Hill,.
    • [12] Julia Kiseleva, Kyle Williams, Jiepu Jiang, Ahmed Hassan Awadallah, Aidan C. Crook, Imed Zitouni, and Tasos Anastasakos, (2016). Understanding User Satisfaction with Intelligent Assistants. In Proc. CHIIR '16. 121-130.
    • [13] Lena Mamykina, Bella Manoim, Manas Mittal, George Hripcsak, and Björn Hartmann. (2011) Design lessons from the fastest Q&A site in the west. In Proc CHI'11 2857-2866.
    • [14] Richard S. Marcus (1983). An experimental comparison of the effectiveness of computers and humans as search intermediaries. J. Am. Soc. Inf. Sci., 34: 381-404.
    • [15] Daniel Russell (2015). Mindtools: what does it mean to be literate in the age of Google? J. Comput. Sci. Coll. 30(3) 5-6.
    • [16] Pertti Vakkari (2016). Searching as learning: A systematization based on literature. Journal of Information Science. 42: 7-18.
    • [17] Ryen W. White, Bill Kules, Steven M. Drucker, and m.c. schraefel. (2006). Introduction. Comm. ACM 49 (4), 36-39.
    • [18] Barbara M. Wildemuth and Luanne Freund. (2012). Assigning search tasks designed to elicit exploratory search behaviors. In Proc HCIR '12. ACM, New York, NY, USA,
    • [19] Max L. Wilson (2011). "Search user interface design." Synthesis lectures on information concepts, retrieval, and services 3.3: 1-143.
  • No related research data.
  • No similar publications.

Share - Bookmark

Cite this article