LOGIN TO YOUR ACCOUNT

Username
Password
Remember Me
Or use your Academic/Social account:

CREATE AN ACCOUNT

Or use your Academic/Social account:

Congratulations!

You have just completed your registration at OpenAire.

Before you can login to the site, you will need to activate your account. An e-mail will be sent to you with the proper instructions.

Important!

Please note that this site is currently undergoing Beta testing.
Any new content you create is not guaranteed to be present to the final version of the site upon release.

Thank you for your patience,
OpenAire Dev Team.

Close This Message

CREATE AN ACCOUNT

Name:
Username:
Password:
Verify Password:
E-mail:
Verify E-mail:
*All Fields Are Required.
Please Verify You Are Human:
fbtwitterlinkedinvimeoflicker grey 14rssslideshare1
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Languages: English
Types: Article
Subjects: psychology
The sudden displacement of the retinal image during a saccade raises the visual threshold of human observers tofoveal stimuli. The fall in visual sensitivity observed during this phenomenon, known as saccadic suppression,seems to occur very early in the visual processing chain. The lateral geniculate nucleus (LGN) is a likely locus forthe multiple retinal and extraretinal interactions occurring during saccadic eye movements, therefore we used theresponses of relay cells of adult cats to simulate a pychophysical experiment. We first measured the responses of X and Y relay cells (27 X and 13 Y) to central spots of optimal size and different contrasts. The spots werepresented either alone or time locked with the rapid movement of a large, high-contrast peripheral pattern, referredto asshift . We measured the percentage of trials on which the relay cell fired more spikes when the spot (contrast:0.03–1.0) was present than when it was absent. In experiments with human observers the task was to indicate, bya keypress, which of two otherwise identical temporal intervals contained the spot. The shift reduces the sensitivity(raises the contrast threshold) of neurones in the cat relay cells to brief, stationary targets presented to thereceptive-field center. The suppression of visual sensitivity is significantly greater in Y cells than in X cells(average sensitivity ratios 5.665.4 in Y cells, 1.5960.9 in X cells:PϽ0.001,U test). The shift also reducesthe sensitivity of human observers to the same target. This suggests that the LGN is a potential locus for themodulation of visual responses that leads to saccadic suppression.
  • The results below are discovered through our pilot algorithms. Let us know how we are doing!

    • Breitmeyer, B., Valberg, A., Kurtenbach, W. & Neumeyer, C. (1980). The lateral effect of oscillation of peripheral luminance gratings on the foveal increment threshold. Vision Research 20, 799-805.
    • Burr, D.C., Holt, J., Johnstone, J.R. & Ross, J. (1982). Selective depression of motion sensitivity during saccades. Journal of Physiology 333, 1-16.
    • Burr, D.C. & Morrone, M.C. (1996). Temporal impulse response functions for luminance and color during saccades. Vision Research 36, 2069-2078.
    • Burr, D.C., Morrone, M.C. & Ross, J. (1994). Selective suppression of the magnocellular visual pathway during saccadic eye movements. Nature 371, 511-513.
    • Derrington, A.M. & Lennie, P. (1984). Spatial and temporal contrast sensitivities of neurones in lateral geniculate nucleus of macaque. Journal of Physiology 357, 219-240.
    • Derrington, A.M., Lennie, P. & Wright, M.J. (1979). The mechanism of peripherally evoked responses in retinal ganglion cells. Journal of Physiology 289, 299-310.
    • Derrington, A.M. (1984). Spatial frequency selectivity of remote pattern masking. Vision Research 24, 1965-1968.
    • Derrington, A.M. (1985). Interactions between receptive field and periphery in cat LGN cells. Journal of Physiology 358, 14P.
    • Enroth-Cugell, C. & Jakiela, H.G. (1980). Suppression of cat retinal ganglion cell responses by moving patterns. Journal of Physiology 302, 49-72.
    • Essock, E.A., Lehmkuhle, S., Frascella, J. & Enoch, J.M. (1985). Temporal modulation of the background affects the sensitization response of X- and Y-cells in the dLGN of cat. Vision Research, 25, 1007-1019.
    • Felisberti, F. & Derrington, A.M. (1997). Virtual saccades suppresses visual signals in the cat LGN. Investigative Ophthalmology and Visual Science 38, 1800.
    • Fischer, B., Barth, R. & Sternheim, C.E. (1978). Interaction of receptive field responses and shift-effect in cat retinal and geniculate neurons. Experimental Brain Research 31, 235-248.
    • Fischer, B., Krüger, J. & Droll, W. (1975). Quantitative aspects of the shift-effect in cat retinal ganglion cells. Brain Research 83, 391-403.
    • Fischer, W.H., Schmidt, M., Stuphorn, V. & Hoffmann, K.P. (1996). Response properties of relay cells in the A-laminae of the cats dorsal lateral geniculate nucleus after saccades. Experimental Brain Research 110, 435-445.
    • Funke, K. & Eysel, U.T. (1995). Pharmacological inactivation of pretectal nuclei reveals different modulatory effects on retinogeniculate transmission by X-cells and Y-cells the cat. Visual Neuroscience 12, 21-33.
    • Guillery, R.W. (1969). The organization of synaptic interconnections in the laminae of the dorsal lateral geniculate nucleus of the cat. Zeitschrift für Zellforschung und Mikroskopische Anatomie 96, 1-38.
    • Kaplan, E., & Shapley, R.M. (1982). X and Y cells in the lateral geniculate nucleus of macaque monkeys. Journal of Physiology 330, 125-144.
    • Krüger, J. & Fischer, B. (1973). Strong periphery effect in cat retinal ganglion cells. Excitatory responses in ON- and OFF-center neurones to single grid displacements. Experimental Brain Research 18, 316-318.
    • Krüger, J., Fischer, B. & Barth, R. (1975). The shift-effect in retinal ganglion cells of the rhesus monkey. Experimental Brain Research 23, 443-446.
    • Lal, R. & Friedlander, M.J. (1989). Gating of retinal transmission by afferent eye position and movement signals. Science 243, 93-96.
    • Lal, R. & Friedlander, M.J. (1990). Effect of passive eye movement on retinogeniculate transmission in the cat. Journal Neurophysiology 63, 523-538.
    • MacKay, D.M. (1970). Elevation of visual threshold by displacement of retinal image. Nature 225, 90-92.
    • McIlwain, J.T. (1966). Some evidence concerning the physiological basis of the periphery effect in the cat's retina. Experimental Brain Research 1, 265-271.
    • Molotchnikoff, S., Casanova, C., Laferriere, C. & Delaunais, D. (1983). The superior colliculus simultaneously modifies the responses of the lateral geniculate cells and of the oculomotor nuclei. Brain Research Bulletin 10, 719-722.
    • Montero, V.M. (1991). A quantitative study of synaptic contacts on interneurons and relay cells of the cat lateral geniculate nucleus. Experimental Brain Research 86, 257-270.
    • Noda, H. (1975a). Depression in the excitability of relay cells of lateral geniculate nucleus following saccadic eye movements in the cat. Journal of Physiology 249, 87-102.
    • Noda, H. (1975b). Discharges of relay cells in lateral geniculate nucleus of the cat during spontaneous eye movements in light and darkness. Journal of Physiology 250, 579-595.
    • Noda, H. & Adey, W.R. (1974). Retinal ganglion cells of the cat transfer information on saccadic eye movement and quick target motion. Brain Research 70, 340-345.
    • Pelli, D.G. & Zhang, L. (1991). Accurate control of contrast on microcomputer displays. Vision Research 31, 1337-1350.
    • Riggs, L.A. & Manning, K.A. (1982). Saccadic suppression under conditions of whiteout. Investigative Ophthalmology and Visual Science 23, 138-143.
    • Schmidt, M. (1996). Neurons in the cat pretectum that project to the dorsal lateral geniculate nucleus are activated during saccades. Journal of Neurophysiology 76, 2907-2918.
    • Schweigart, G. & Hoffmann, K.-P. (1992). Pretectal jerk neuron activity during saccadic eye movements and visual stimulations in the cat. Experimental Brain Research 91, 273-283.
    • Shapley, R.M. & Victor, J.D. (1981). How the contrast gain control modifies the frequency responses of cat retinal ganglion cells. Journal of Physiology 318, 161-180.
    • Sillito, A.M., Cudeiro, J. & Murphy, P.C. (1993). Orientation sensitive elements in the corticofugal influence on center-surround interactions in the dorsal lateral geniculate nucleus. Experimental Brain Research 93, 6-16.
    • Troy, J.B. (1983). Spatio-temporal interaction in neurones of the cat's dorsal lateral geniculate nucleus. Journal of Physiology 344, 419-432.
    • Valberg, A. & Breitmeyer, B. (1980). The lateral effect of oscillation of peripheral luminance gratings: Test of various hypotheses. Vision Research 20, 789-798.
    • Volkmann, F.C. (1986). Human visual suppression. Vision Research 26, 1401-1416.
    • Wahle, P., Stuphorn, V., Schmidt, M. & Hoffmann, K.P. (1994). LGNprojecting neurons of the cats pretectum express glutamic-acid decarboxylase messensger-RNA. European Journal of Neuroscience 6, 454- 460.
    • Wilson, J.R. (1993). Circuitry of the dorsal lateral geniculate nucleus in the cat and monkey. Acta Anatomica 147, 1.
  • No related research data.
  • No similar publications.

Share - Bookmark

Funded by projects

  • WT

Cite this article