LOGIN TO YOUR ACCOUNT

Username
Password
Remember Me
Or use your Academic/Social account:

CREATE AN ACCOUNT

Or use your Academic/Social account:

Congratulations!

You have just completed your registration at OpenAire.

Before you can login to the site, you will need to activate your account. An e-mail will be sent to you with the proper instructions.

Important!

Please note that this site is currently undergoing Beta testing.
Any new content you create is not guaranteed to be present to the final version of the site upon release.

Thank you for your patience,
OpenAire Dev Team.

Close This Message

CREATE AN ACCOUNT

Name:
Username:
Password:
Verify Password:
E-mail:
Verify E-mail:
*All Fields Are Required.
Please Verify You Are Human:
fbtwitterlinkedinvimeoflicker grey 14rssslideshare1
Languages: English
Types: Unknown
Subjects:

Classified by OpenAIRE into

ACM Ref: InformationSystems_INFORMATIONINTERFACESANDPRESENTATION(e.g.,HCI)
Notation is a central issue in modern western music. Composers have often sought ways of expanding and refining the functionality of notation and, in doing so, have re-shaped the music that they were originally aiming to describe. Other musical traditions have very different uses for notation; some have no use for it at all; each approach creates contrasting musical experiences.\ud The role that electronics and computers have played in music has also influenced the nature and function of notation. More traditional 'live' notation of note/pitch- based music generated algorithmically has proved particularly problematic: musical notation is itself a very complex subject. Composers and technologists have instead used libraries of images, algorithms for the pre- generation of material or simplified notations that can be used as the basis of more improvisatory performances.\ud This paper presents work involving the live presentation of 'traditionally precise' music notation created through algorithmically generated material. This notation can then be performed by a human musician alongside computer-generated diffused sound or other 'real' musicians. Technologies used include the SuperCollider audio programming environment and the INScore notation project with the Open Sound Control protocol used to communicate between them. As well as providing a fascinating musical experience, the process highlights a number of issues concerning performance practice, instrumental technique, rehearsal, time and timing, as well as the nature of notation itself and its relationship to improvisation.
  • The results below are discovered through our pilot algorithms. Let us know how we are doing!

    • [1] Agostini, A, and Ghisi, D., Bach Project, [Online], available at: http://www.bachproject.net/bach/home_page.ht ml, [retrieved 27 January 2012], 2012.
    • [2] Ariza, C. "The Interrogator as Critic: The Turing Test and the Evaluation of Generative Music Systems." Computer Music Journal 33(2), 2009.
    • [3] Chadabe, J. Electronic music Organised Sound: 9, p3-6, 2004
    • [4] Collins, N. "The Analysis of Generative Music Programs." Organised Sound 13(3). 2008
    • [5] Collins, N. "Musical Form and Algorithmic Composition." Contemporary Music Review 28(1): 103-114, 2009.
    • [6] Didkovsky, N., & Hajdu, G., "MaxScore: music notation in Max/MSP". ICMC, SARC, Belfast. 2008.
    • [7] Fober, D., Orlarey, Y., Letz, S., "INScore: An Environment for the Design of Live Music Scores". New Interfaces for Musical Expression, Oslo, Norway. 2011.
    • [8] Freeman, J. "Extreme Sight-Reading, Mediated Expression, and Audience Participation: RealTime Music Notation in Live Performance." Computer Music Journal 32(3): 25-41. 2008.
    • [9] Freeman, J. & Colella, A. “Tools for Real-Time Music Notation”, Contemporary Music Review, 29:1, 101-113. 2010.
    • [10] Frances-Hoad, C., Hall, T., Hoadley, R., Turner, J. Triggered. Cambridge and London: Music, dance, hardware and software design, 2011.
    • [11] Frances-Hoad, C. personal communication, 2012.
    • [12] Furneaux, S. and Land, M. “The Effects of Skill on the Eye-Hand Span during Musical SightReading.” Proceedings: Biological Sciences 266:1436, 2435-2440. 1999.
    • [13] Hajdu, G., Niggemann, K., Siska, A. & Andrea Szigetvari. “Notation in the Context of Quintet.net Projects”, Contemporary Music Review, 29:1, 39-53. 2010
    • [14] Hedelin, F. "Formalising Form: An Alternative Approach To Algorithmic Composition." Organised Sound 13(3): 249-257, 2008.
    • [15] Hoadley, R., Calder's Violin. [Online], available at: http://rhoadley.net/video/calder, [retrieved 25 May 2012], 2012.
    • [16] Hoadley, R., Fluxus Tree. [Online], available at: http://rhoadley.net/fluxustree, [retrieved 31 May 2012], 2012.
    • [17] Hoadley, R., INScore class for SuperCollider. [Online], to be available at: http://rhoadley.net/software/inscore, [retrieved 31 May 2012], 2012.
    • [18] Hudak, P., Makucevich, T., Gadde, S., Whong, B. "Haskore Music Notation - An Algebra of Music." Journal of Functional Programming 1(1). 1993.
    • [19] Loy, D. G., Musimathics : the mathematical foundations of music, Cambridge, Mass. ; London: MIT Press. 2006.
    • [20] McClelland, C., Alcorn, M., "Exploring new composer/performer interactions using real-time notation". ICMC, SARC, Belfast. 2008.
    • [21] Rayner, K. and Pollatsek, A. “Eye Movements, the Eye-Hand Span, and the Perceptual Span during Sight-Reading of Music”. Current Directions in Psychological Science. 6(2). 49- 53. 1997
    • [22] Rowe, R., Machine musicianship, Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press. 2001.
    • [23] Tsuji, M., Personal communication, 2012.
    • [24] Wulfson, H., Barrett, G., Winter, M., "Automatic Notation Generators". New Interfaces for Musical Expression, New York, 2007.
    • [25] Unknown reviewer, personal communication, 2012.
  • No related research data.
  • No similar publications.

Share - Bookmark

Cite this article