LOGIN TO YOUR ACCOUNT

Username
Password
Remember Me
Or use your Academic/Social account:

CREATE AN ACCOUNT

Or use your Academic/Social account:

Congratulations!

You have just completed your registration at OpenAire.

Before you can login to the site, you will need to activate your account. An e-mail will be sent to you with the proper instructions.

Important!

Please note that this site is currently undergoing Beta testing.
Any new content you create is not guaranteed to be present to the final version of the site upon release.

Thank you for your patience,
OpenAire Dev Team.

Close This Message

CREATE AN ACCOUNT

Name:
Username:
Password:
Verify Password:
E-mail:
Verify E-mail:
*All Fields Are Required.
Please Verify You Are Human:
fbtwitterlinkedinvimeoflicker grey 14rssslideshare1
Mantzourani, Efthymia; Potter Floyd, Georgia; James, Delyth (2017)
Publisher: Taylor & Francis
Languages: English
Types: Article
Subjects: RS

Classified by OpenAIRE into

mesheuropmc: education
Objective. To engage pharmacy students in a ‘mock medicines’ teaching activity to increase\ud their understanding of the patients’ perspectives of medicine-taking. To explore students’\ud awareness of intentional reasons for non-adherence.\ud Methods. Students were given one of five different dosing regimes and asked to take the\ud mock medicine (TicTacs©) over a one-week period. They completed a data capture form to\ud log each dose taken or missed and provide reasons for this. An adherence score was\ud calculated and all feedback transcribed for further analysis.\ud Results. Seventy-six out of 115 students submitted forms, where adherence ranged from 4\ud to 100% (mean 88.7, SD=19.77). Nine factors relating to unintentional non-adherence were\ud identified compared to only one for intentional non-adherence.\ud Conclusions. Students engaged well with this activity showing a high percentage adherence\ud but this was not related to the complexity of dosing schedule. Students demonstrated more\ud awareness of the unintentional reasons for non-adherence than intentional.
  • The results below are discovered through our pilot algorithms. Let us know how we are doing!

    • 1. Horne R. (2006) Beliefs and adherence to treatment: the challenges for research and clinical practice. In Halligan P, Aylward M. The Power of Belief Psychological Influences on Illness, Disability and Medicine. United States: Oxford University Press;115-135.
    • 2. Horne R. (2000) Non-adherence to medication: causes and implications for care. In: Paul Gard A Behavioural Approach to Pharmacy Practice. Oxford: Blackwell Science Ltd; 111- 130.
    • 3. Donovan JL, Blake DR. (1992) Patient non-compliance: deviance or reasoned decisionmaking? Soc Sci Med.34(5),507-513.
    • 4. Abdel-Tawab R, James DH, Fichtinger A, Clatworthy J, Horne R, Davies JG. (2011) Development and validation of the medication-related consultation framework (MRCF). Patient Educ Couns.83 (3):451-7.
    • 5. Darbishire PL, Plake KS, Kiersma ME, White JK. (2012) An introductory pharmacy practice experience on improving medication adherence. Am J Pharm Educ. 76(3):42:1-8.
    • 6. McDonough RP, Bennett MS. (2006) Improving communication skills of pharmacy students through effective precepting. Am J Pharm Educ. 70(3):58:1-12.
    • 7. James D, Nastasic S, Horne R, Davies G. (2001) The design and evaluation of a simulated-patient teaching programme to develop the consultation skills of undergraduate pharmacy students. World Sci 23(6):212-216.
    • 8. Schwartz B, Bohay R. (2012) Can empathy help teach professionalism and empathy to dental students? Adding patient videos to a lecture. J Dent Educ. 76(2):174-184.
    • 9. Shapiro J. How do physicians teach empathy in the primary care setting? (2002) Acad Med. 77(4):323-328.
    • 10. Chen JT, LaLopa J, Devra DK. (2008) Impact of patient empathy modelling on pharmacy students caring for the undeserved. Am J Pharm Educ. 72(2):40. p1-11.
    • 11. Eisner EW. (1982) Cognition and curriculum: a basis for deciding what to teach. New York: Longman.
    • 12. Divine HS, Cain J. (2009) Assessing the effect of a polypharmacy medication adherence simulation project in a geriatrics course in a college of pharmacy. J Am Geriatr Soc. 57(8):1487-1491.
    • 13. O'Connor DM, Savageau JA, Centerbar DB, Wamback KN, Ingle JS, Lomerson NJ. (2009) Lesson in a pill Box: teaching about the challenges of medication adherence. Fam Med. 41(2):99-104.
    • 14. Ulbrich T, Hamer D Lehotsky K. (2012) Second-year pharmacy students' perceptions of adhering to a complex simulated medication regimen. Am J Pharm Educ. 76(1):11.
    • 15. Fernandes M, Leite A, Basto M, et al. (2014) Non-adherence to antibiotic therapy in patients visiting community pharmacies. Int J Clin Pharm. 36(1):86-91.
    • 16. Kardas P. Patient compliance with antibiotic treatment for respiratory tract infections. (2002) J Antimicrob Chemother.49:897-903.
    • 17. Reginster JY, Rabenda V, Neuprez A. (2006) Adherence, patient preference and dosing frequency: understanding the relationship. Bone. 38(4 Suppl1):S2-S6.
    • 18. Payer J, Killinger Z, Sulkova I, Celec P. (2008) Preferences of patients receiving bisphosphonates- how to influence the therapeutic adherence. Biomed Pharmacother. 62(2):122-124.
    • 19. Caldeira D, Vaz-Carneiro A, Costa J. (2014) The Impact of dosing frequency on medication adherence in chronic cardiovascular disease: systematic review and metaanalysis. Rev Port Cardiol. 33(7-8):431-437.
  • No related research data.
  • No similar publications.

Share - Bookmark

Cite this article