Remember Me
Or use your Academic/Social account:


Or use your Academic/Social account:


You have just completed your registration at OpenAire.

Before you can login to the site, you will need to activate your account. An e-mail will be sent to you with the proper instructions.


Please note that this site is currently undergoing Beta testing.
Any new content you create is not guaranteed to be present to the final version of the site upon release.

Thank you for your patience,
OpenAire Dev Team.

Close This Message


Verify Password:
Verify E-mail:
*All Fields Are Required.
Please Verify You Are Human:
fbtwitterlinkedinvimeoflicker grey 14rssslideshare1
Wu, Wenjie
Languages: English
Types: Unknown
Mentalising as a process for explaining and predicting behavior relates to inferring mental states and traits of others. Previous research of mentalising has focused too heavily on mental states and insufficiently on personality traits. Given this context, the current thesis aimed to explore the phenomenon of forming first impressions of personality based on a brief sample of behavior.\ud \ud In the current research, after being filmed in diverse naturalistic scenarios, targets filled in an “empathy quotient” (EQ) questionnaire and the NEO Five-Factor Inventory-3 (NEO-FFI-3) for respectively measuring empathic traits and the Big-Five personality dimensions. Perceivers were asked to guess the results of target self-reported EQ or the Big Five traits while observing the target in the context of minimal information presented in different types of way (e.g., videos, audios and photographs). Findings from Studies 1 to 8 converge in revealing that perceivers are surprisingly effective in accurately guessing targets who either had low or high EQ and targets who were extreme in one or more personality dimensions, but not so effective in identifying targets with average personality. These judgments were based on the behavior of the target and not merely on an image of the target. Studies 1 and 2 revealed that perceivers were biased to assume the targets were rather similar to how empathizing they perceived themselves, but perceivers’ confidence did not predict their accuracy in judgments of target empathy. Study 6 demonstrated a relationship between perceivers’ ratings of targets’ expressivity and how perceivers judged target EQ. Additionally, a survey was created to examine people’s commonsense views about first impressions of personality. \ud \ud Results of all studies were discussed with reference to the processes by which people make first-impression personality judgments. The current research adds to the literature of mentalising in speaking about the breadth, versatility and sensitivity of our abilities.
  • The results below are discovered through our pilot algorithms. Let us know how we are doing!

    • Ames, D. R., Kammrath, L. K., Suppes, A., & Bolger, N (2010). Dissociation between accuracy and confidence in thin-slice impressions. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 36, 264-277.
    • Allport, G. W. (1937). Personality: A psychological interpretation. New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston.
    • Albright, L., Kenny, D. A., & Malloy, T. E. (1988). Consensus in personality judgments at zero acquaintance. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 55, 387-395.
    • Ambady, N. (2010). The perils of pondering: Intuition and thin slice judgments. Psychological Inquiry, 21 (4), 271-278.
    • Ambady, N., LaPlante, D., & Johnson, E. (2001). Thin slice judgments as a measure of interpersonal sensitivity. In J. A. Hall & F. J. Bernieri (Eds.), Interpersonal Sensitivity: Theory and Measurement (pp. 89-101), Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
    • Ambady, N., Bernieri, F., & Richeson, J. (2000). Towards a histology of social behavior: Judgmental accuracy from thin slices of behavior. In M. P. Zanna (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (pp. 201-272). New York, NY: Academic Press.
    • Ambady, N., & Rosenthal, R. (1993). Half a minute: Predicting teacher evaluations from thin slices of behavior and physical attractiveness. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 64, 431-441.
    • Ambady, N., & Rosenthal, R. (1992). Thin slices of expressive behavior as predictors of interpersonal consequences: A meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 111, 256-274.
    • Apperly, I. A. (2013). Can theory of mind grow up? Mindreading in adults, and its
  • No related research data.
  • No similar publications.

Share - Bookmark

Cite this article