LOGIN TO YOUR ACCOUNT

Username
Password
Remember Me
Or use your Academic/Social account:

CREATE AN ACCOUNT

Or use your Academic/Social account:

Congratulations!

You have just completed your registration at OpenAire.

Before you can login to the site, you will need to activate your account. An e-mail will be sent to you with the proper instructions.

Important!

Please note that this site is currently undergoing Beta testing.
Any new content you create is not guaranteed to be present to the final version of the site upon release.

Thank you for your patience,
OpenAire Dev Team.

Close This Message

CREATE AN ACCOUNT

Name:
Username:
Password:
Verify Password:
E-mail:
Verify E-mail:
*All Fields Are Required.
Please Verify You Are Human:
fbtwitterlinkedinvimeoflicker grey 14rssslideshare1
Publisher: Elsevier
Languages: English
Types: Article
Subjects:
The aim was to develop and evaluate an online learning tool for use with UK healthcare employees, healthcare educators and healthcare students, to increase knowledge of workplace wellness as an important public health issue. A ‘Workplace Wellness’ e-learning tool was developed and peer-reviewed by 14 topic experts. This focused on six key areas relating to workplace wellness: work-related stress, musculoskeletal disorders, diet and nutrition, physical activity, smoking and alcohol consumption. Each key area provided current evidence-based information on causes and consequences, access to UK government reports and national statistics, and guidance on actions that could be taken to improve health within a workplace setting. 188 users (93.1% female, age 18–60) completed online knowledge questionnaires before (n = 188) and after (n = 88) exposure to the online learning tool. Baseline knowledge of workplace wellness was poor (n = 188; mean accuracy 47.6%, s.d. 11.94). Knowledge significantly improved from baseline to post-intervention (mean accuracy = 77.5%, s.d. 13.71) (t(75) = −14.801, p < 0.0005) with knowledge increases evident for all included topics areas. Usability evaluation showed that participants perceived the tool to be useful (96.4%), engaging (73.8%) and would recommend it to others (86.9%). Healthcare professionals, healthcare educators and pre-registered healthcare students held positive attitudes towards online learning, indicating scope for development of further online packages relating to other important health parameters.
  • The results below are discovered through our pilot algorithms. Let us know how we are doing!

    • Atack, L. and Rankin, J. (2002). A descriptive study of registered nurses' experiences with web based learning.
    • Journal of Advanced Nursing 40(4): 457-465.
    • Back, D., Haberstroh, N., Antolic, A., Sostmann, K., Schmindmaier, G. and Hoff, E. (2014) Blended learning approach improves teaching in a problem-based learning environment in orthopedics - a pilot study. BMC Medical Education 14 (17).
    • Barnard-Ashton, P., Koch, L. and Rothberg, A. (2014) The influence of blended learning on student performance in an undergraduate occupational therapy curriculum. South African Journal of Occupational Therapy 44 (1): 75-80.
    • Biggs, J. (1999). Teaching for Quality Learning at University. Buckingham: SRHE and Open University Press.
    • Black, C. (2008) Working for a healthier tomorrow. London: The Stationary Office.
    • Black, C. And Frost (2011). Health at work - an independent review of sickness absence (Cm8205). London: The Stationary Office.
    • Blake, H. (2010). Computer-Based Learning Objects in Healthcare: The Student Experience. International Journal of Nursing Education Scholarship 7(1): 1-15.
    • Blake, H. and Chambers, D. (2011). Supporting nurse health champions: Developing a 'new generation' of health improvement facilitators. Health Education Journal 1-6.
    • GARTSHORE, E and BLAKE, H, 2014. "Workplace Wellness": online learning package. University of Nottingham.
    • Last accessed 04.07.2016.
    • Hegney D, Tuckett A, Parker D, Robert E (2010). Access to and support for continuing professional education amongst Queensland nurses: 2004 and 2007. Nurse Education Today, 27 (6) 602-9.
    • Mooney, B., Timmins, F., Byrne, G, and Corroon, A. (2011) Nursing students' attitudes to health promotion to: Implications for teaching practice. Nurse Education Today 31(8): 841-848.
    • Polit, D. and Tatano-Beck, C. (2013). Essentials of Nursing Research: Appraising Evidence for Nursing Practice (7th Ed). Philadelphia: Lippincott Williams and Wilkins.
    • Shareck, M., Frohlich, K. and Poland, B. (2013) Reducing social inequities in health through settings-related interventions -- a conceptual framework. Global Health Promotion 20(2): 39-52.
    • Smyth, S., Houghton, C., Cooney, A., Casey, D. (2012) Students' experiences of blended learning across a range of postgraduate programmes. Nursing Education Today 32 (4) pp.464-468 Ward R, Moule P, Lockyer L. (2009). Adoption of Web 2.0 Technologies in Education for Health Professionals in the UK: Where Are We and Why? Electronic Journal of e-Learning 7 (2): 165-72.
    • West, M., Dawson, J., Admasachew, L. and Topakas, A. (2011). NHS Staff Management and Health Service Quality Results from the NHS Staff Survey and Related Data. London: DH.
    • Wharrad, H., Sanderson-Mann, J., McCandless, F. and Riley, F. (2012). Using reusable learning objects to raise awareness and disseminate research findings about the impact of dyslexia on placement-based learning.
    • Diversity & Equality in Health & Care 9(2): 141-149.
    • Windle, R. Laverty, H., Herman, L., Hallawell, B. and Wharrad, H. (2010). Nursing students can teach their peers by developing e-learning resources. Learning Disability Practice 13(9): 26-29.
  • No related research data.
  • No similar publications.

Share - Bookmark

Cite this article