Remember Me
Or use your Academic/Social account:


Or use your Academic/Social account:


You have just completed your registration at OpenAire.

Before you can login to the site, you will need to activate your account. An e-mail will be sent to you with the proper instructions.


Please note that this site is currently undergoing Beta testing.
Any new content you create is not guaranteed to be present to the final version of the site upon release.

Thank you for your patience,
OpenAire Dev Team.

Close This Message


Verify Password:
Verify E-mail:
*All Fields Are Required.
Please Verify You Are Human:
fbtwitterlinkedinvimeoflicker grey 14rssslideshare1
Publisher: John Benjamin
Languages: English
Types: Article
Subjects: H
During the early years a young child gradually becomes a member of a culture by learning how to understand and then produce relevant social practices – particularly through interaction in conversation. This paper examines how one child adapts to the practices surrounding the production of questions and answers. Adopting a longitudinal case-study approach and employing conversation analysis, consideration is given to the question-answer practices this child produces during asymmetric conversations across the period when she is acquiring conversational skills (from 12 months to 3 years 7 months). Through a micro-analytic examination of extract examples across this period, it becomes clear that although initially a child can learn the format of question-answer sequences, it is not until the third year that some recognition of being accountable for the form of an answer becomes evident. Between the ages of 2 and 3, we observe that this child is called to account for answers that are deemed inappropriate or odd. Concluding comments consider these practices as forms of social adaptation within asymmetric interactive contexts.
  • The results below are discovered through our pilot algorithms. Let us know how we are doing!

    • Anselmi, D., Tomasello, M., & Acunzo, M. (1986). Young children's responses to neutral and specific contingent queries. Journal of Child Language, 13, 135-144.
    • Bruner, J. (1986). Acts of meaning. New York: Basic Books.
    • Butler, C., & Fitzgerald, R. (2010). Membership-in-action: Operative identities in a family meal. Journal of Pragmatics, 42(9), 2462-2474.
    • Cole, M. (1980). Foundations of social thought. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    • de Leon, L. (2007). Parallelism, metalinguistic play, and the interactive emergence of Zinacantec Mayan siblings' culture. Research on Language and Social Interaction, 40(4), 405-436.
    • Filipi, A. (2007). A toddler's treatment of MM and MM HM in talk with a parent. Australian Review of Applied Linguistics, 30(3), 33-41.
    • Freed, A.F., & Ehrlich, S. (Eds.). (2010). Why do you ask?:eTh function of questions in institutional discourse. New York: Oxford University Press.
    • French, P., & Maclure, M. (Eds.). (1981). Adult-child conversation. London: Croom Helm.
    • Gardner, R. (2010). Question and answer sequences in Garrwa talk. Australian Journal of Linguistics, 30(4), 423-445.
    • Gerholm, T. (2011). Children's development of facework practices - An emotional endeavor. Journal of Pragmatics, 43, 3099-3110.
    • Ginzburg, J., & Kolliakou, D. (2009). Answers without questions: eTh emergence of fragments in child language. Journal of Linguistics, 45(3), 641-673.
    • Golinko,f R.M. (Ed.). (1983). eTh transition from pre-linguistic to linguistic communication . Hillsdale, N.J.: Lawrence Earlbaum Associates.
    • Halliday, M. (1975). Learning how to mean. New York: Arnold.
    • Heinemann, T. (2010). eTh question-response system of Danish. Journal of Pragmatics, 42(10), 2703-2725.
    • Heritage, J. (2002). eTh limits of questioning: Negative interrogatives and hostile question content. Journal of Pragmatics, 34, 1427-1446.
    • Ingram, D., & Tyack, D. (1979). eTh inversion of the subject NP and Aux in children's questions. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 4, 333-351.
    • Jeefrson, G. (1983). On exposed and embedded correction in conversation. Studia Linguistica, 14, 58-68.
    • Keel, S. (2011). eTh parents' questioning repeats in response to young children's evaluative turns. Gesprächsforschung - Online-Zeitschrift zur verbalen Interaktion , 12, 52-94.
    • Kidwell, M., & Zimmerman, D. (2007). Joint attention as action. Journal of Pragmatics, 39, 592-611.
    • Lu, P.C., & Huang, C.C. (2006). Interruption in Mandarin mother-child conversation. Concentric: Studies in Linguistics, 32(2), 1-31.
    • MacWhinney, B. (2007). CHILDES - Tools for analysing talk. Electronic Edition (http://childes. psy.cmu.edu/manuals/chat.pdf). Ed. Mahwah, N.J.: Lawrence Earlbaum.
    • Marcos, H. (1991). Reformulating requests at 18 months: Gestures, vocalizations and words. First Language, 11, 361-375.
    • Ninio, A., & Snow, C. (1996). Pragmatic development. Boulder, CO: Westview.
    • O'Reilly, M. (2008). What value is there in children's talk? Investigating family therapists' interruptions of parents and children during the therapeutic process. Journal of Pragmatics, 40(3), 507-524.
    • Pan, B.A., & Snow, C.E. (1999). eTh development of conversation and discourse skills. In M.  Barrett (Ed.), eTh development of language (pp. 229-249). Hove, Sussex: Psychology Press.
    • Psathas, G. (1995). Conversation analysis. London: Sage.
    • Robinson, E.J. (1992). Young children's detection of semantic anomaly. First Language, 12, 207-222.
    • Sacks, H. (1992). Lectures on conversation, vol. 1. Oxford: Blackwell.
    • Shakespeare, P. (1998). Aspects of confused speech: A study of verbal interaction between confused and normal speakers. Mahwah, N.J.: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
    • Sidnell, J. (2010). Questioning repeats in the talk of four-year-old children. In H. Gardner, & M.A. Forrester (Eds.), Analysing interactions in childhood: Insights from conversation analysis (pp. 103-127). Chichester: Wiley-Blackwell.
    • Stokoe, E., & Edwards, D. (2010). “I advise you not to answer that question”: Conversation analysis, legal interaction and the analysis of lawyers' turns in police interrogations of suspects. In A. Johnson, & M. Coulthard (Eds.), Routledge handbook in forensic linguistics (pp. 155-178). London: Routledge.
    • Tomasello, M. (2005). Constructing a language: A usage-based theory of language acquisition. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press.
    • Vygotsky, L.S. (1979). Mind in society. Cambridge, Mass: Harvard University Press.
    • Wootton, A. (2007). A puzzle about 'please': Repair, increments and related matters in the speech of a young child. Research on Language and Social Interaction, 40, 171-198.
    • Wootton, A.J. (1997). Interaction and the development of mind. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
  • No related research data.
  • No similar publications.

Share - Bookmark

Cite this article