Remember Me
Or use your Academic/Social account:


Or use your Academic/Social account:


You have just completed your registration at OpenAire.

Before you can login to the site, you will need to activate your account. An e-mail will be sent to you with the proper instructions.


Please note that this site is currently undergoing Beta testing.
Any new content you create is not guaranteed to be present to the final version of the site upon release.

Thank you for your patience,
OpenAire Dev Team.

Close This Message


Verify Password:
Verify E-mail:
*All Fields Are Required.
Please Verify You Are Human:
fbtwitterlinkedinvimeoflicker grey 14rssslideshare1
Pilcher, Nick; Smith, Karen; Riley, Jackie (2013)
Publisher: International Society for Exploring Teaching and Learning (ISETL)
Languages: English
Types: Article
Subjects: LB

Classified by OpenAIRE into

mesheuropmc: education
Although end of course exams remain a key mode of assessment in higher education, little research has focused on international students’ experiences of exams. There seems to be a tacit assumption in most literature that exam preparation and strategies are universal, although differences in other areas of learning exist. As an exemplar, this article focuses on international students’ first encounters with UK exams and shows that while exams may appear universal, students perceive real differences between the exams they experienced in their home countries and those in the UK. International students’ previous experiences shaped their expectations and impacted on how they prepared for, undertook, and made sense of exams. We draw on findings from a questionnaire answered by 168 international students and in-depth “before” and “after” interviews with 21 students. The data show variety in previous experiences and expectations regarding how international students prepared for exams, the exam environment, and, most importantly, in exam answers students produced. We recommend that in addition to exploring differences in other areas of learning for international students, lecturers clarify what is expected in exams early on and use more exam - type tasks to\ud expose and explore contrasts that lie hidden below the surface of exams.
  • The results below are discovered through our pilot algorithms. Let us know how we are doing!

    • Acres, D. (1992). How to pass exams without anxiety. Plymouth, MA: How to Books.
    • Adrian-Taylor, S. R., Noels, K. A., & Tischler, K. (2007). Conflict between international graduate students and Faculty supervisors: Toward effective conflict prevention and management strategies. Journal of Studies in International Education, 11(1), 90-117. doi:10.1177/1028315306286313
    • Amsberry, D. (2010). Deconstructing plagiarism: International students and textual borrowing practices. The Reference Librarian, 51(1), 31- 44.
    • Ashworth, P., Bannister, P., Thorne, P., & Unit, S. (1997). Guilty in whose eyes? University students' perceptions of cheating and plagiarism in academic work and assessment. Studies in Higher Education, 22(2), 187- 203. doi:10.1080/03075079712331381034
    • Ballard, B., & Clanchy, J. (1991). Teaching students from overseas: A brief guide for lecturers and supervisors. Melbourne, Australia: Longman Cheshire.
    • Beard, C., Clegg, S., & Smith, K. (2007). Acknowledging the affective in higher education. British Educational Research Journal, 33(2), 235- 52. doi:10.1080/01411920701208415
    • Blass, E. (2009). Succeeding in exams and assessments. Harlow, UK: Pearson Education.
    • Byram, M., & Feng, A. (2004). Culture and language learning: Teaching, research and scholarship. Language Teaching, 37(3), 149-68.
    • Carroll, J. (2010). Assessing international students - 'TIS' about trying to stop worrying about the worries. Educational Development, 11(4), 1-2.
    • Carroll, J., & Ryan, J. (2005). Teaching international students: Improving learning for all. London, UK: Routledge.
    • Caruana, V., & Spurling, N. (2007). The internationalisation of UK higher education: A review of selected material. York, UK: Higher Education Academy.
    • Christians, C. G. (2011). Ethics and politics in qualitative research. In N. K. Denzin & Y. S. Lincoln (Eds.), The Sage handbook of qualitative research (pp. 61-80) Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
    • De Vita, G. (2002). Cultural equivalence in the assessment of home and international business management students: A UK exploratory study. Studies in Higher Education, 27(2), 221-31. doi:10.1080/03075070220120038
    • Duff, A. H., Rogers, D. P., & Harris, M. B. (2006). International engineering students-avoiding plagiarism through understanding the Western academic context of scholarship. European Journal of Engineering Education, 31(6), 673-81. doi:10.1080/03043790600911753
    • Duhs, R. (2010). “Please, no exams!” Assessment strategies for international students. Educational Developments, 11(4), 3-6.
    • Duncalf, B. (1999). How to pass any exam. London, UK: Kyle Cathie.
    • Evans, M. (2004). How to pass exams every time. Oxford, UK: How to Books.
    • Fereday, J., & Muir-Cochrane, E. (2006). Demonstrating Rigor Using Thematic Analysis: A hybrid approach of inductive and deductive coding and theme development. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 5(1), 80-92.
    • Fontana, A., & Frey, J. H. (2005). The interview: From neutral stance to political involvement. In N. K. Denzin & Y. S. Lincoln (Eds.), The Sage handbook of qualitative research (pp. 695-727). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
    • Foucault, M. (2000). Truth and juridical forms. In J. D. Faubion (Ed.), Essential works of Foucault. (Vol. 3, pp.7-87). New York, NY: New Press.
    • Gullahorn, J., & Gullahorn, J. (1963). An extension of the U-curve hypothesis. Journal of Social Issues, 19(3), 33-47. doi:10.1111/j.1540- 4560.1963.tb00447.x
    • Holstein, J. A., & Gubrium, J. F. (1995). The active interview. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
    • Hounsell, D., Falchikov, N., Hounsell, J., Klampfleitner, M., Huxham, M., Thomson, K., & Blair, S. (2007). Innovative assessment across the disciplines: An analytical review of literature. York, UK: Higher Education Academy.
    • i-graduate. (2013). International Student Barometer™ and Student Barometer™. Retrieved from http://www.i-graduate.org/services/internationalstudent-barometer-and-student-barometer/
    • Jia, W. (2001). The remaking of the Chinese character and identity in the 21st century: The Chinese face practices. Westport, CT: Ablex Publishing.
    • Johnson, J. M. (2002). In-depth interviewing. In J. F. Gubrium & J. A. Holstein (Eds.), Handbook of interview research : Context and method (pp. 103- 120). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
    • Johnson, R., & Duver, M. (1996). The usefulness of contrastive rhetoric theory in training TESOL teachers and English-as-a-second language students. The Teacher Educator, 32(2), 107-121. doi:10.1080/08878739609555137
    • Knight, P. T. (2002). Summative assessment in higher education: Practices in disarray. Studies in Higher Education, 27(3), 275-286. doi:10.1080/03075070220000662
    • Leader, W. G. (1990). How to pass exams. Cheltenham, UK: Thornes.
    • Lowes, R., Peters, H., & Turner, M. C. (2004). The international student's guide: Studying in English at university. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
    • McClure, J. W. (2007). International graduates' crosscultural adjustment: Experiences, coping strategies and suggested programmatic responses. Teaching in Higher Education, 12(2), 199-217. doi:10.1080/13562510701191976
    • McMillan, K., & Weyers, J. (2010). How to succeed in exams and assessments. Harlow, UK: Prentice Hall.
    • McMillan, K., & Weyers, J. (2011). Study skills for international students. Harlow, UK: Pearson.
    • Mullins, L., & Roberts, M. (1996). Assessment strategies: Some comparisons between UK and the US systems of higher education. International Journal of Educational Management, 10(4), 11-15. doi:10.1108/09513549610122183
    • Ninnes, P., Aitchison, C., & Kalos, S. (1999). Challenges to Stereotypes of international students' prior educational experience: undergraduate education in India. Higher Education Research & Development, 18(3), 323-342.
    • Patton, M. Q. (1990). Qualitative evaluation and research methods (2nd ed.). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
    • Price, M., Carroll, J., O'Donovan, B., & Rust, C. (2011). If I was going there I wouldn't start from here: A critical commentary on current assessment practice. Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education, 36(4), 479-492. doi:10.1080/02602930903512883
    • Reinders, H., Moore, N., & Lewis, M. (2008). The international student handbook. Basingstoke, UK: Palgrave McMillan.
    • Ridley, D. (2004). Puzzling experiences in higher education: Critical moments for conversation. Studies in Higher Education, 29(1), 91-107. doi:10.1080/1234567032000164895
    • Sax, L. J., Gilmartin, S. K., & Bryant, A. N. (2003). Assessing response rates and no response bias in Web and paper surveys. Research in Higher Education, 44(4), 409-432. doi:10.1023/A:1024232915870
    • Smith, C. (2011). Examinations and the ESL student - more evidence of particular disadvantages. Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education, 36(1), 13-25. doi:10.1080/02602930903173959
    • Spencer-Oatey, H. (1997). Unequal relationships in high and low power-distance societies. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 28(3), 284-302. doi:10.1177/0022022197283005
    • Taylor, Y. (2008). The tip of the iceberg: Working on the Victoria Climbié data corpus project. Qualitative Research, 8(1), 115-135. doi:10.1177/1468794107085299
    • Tracy, E. (2002). The student's guide to exam success. Buckingham, UK: OUP.
    • Tran, L. (2009). Making visible “hidden” intentions and potential choices: International students in intercultural communication. Language and Intercultural Communication, 9(4), 271-284. doi:10.1080/14708470902807693
    • Yorke, M. (2001). Formative assessment and its relevance to retention. Higher Education Research & Development 20(2), 115-26.
  • No related research data.
  • No similar publications.

Share - Bookmark

Cite this article