LOGIN TO YOUR ACCOUNT

Username
Password
Remember Me
Or use your Academic/Social account:

CREATE AN ACCOUNT

Or use your Academic/Social account:

Congratulations!

You have just completed your registration at OpenAire.

Before you can login to the site, you will need to activate your account. An e-mail will be sent to you with the proper instructions.

Important!

Please note that this site is currently undergoing Beta testing.
Any new content you create is not guaranteed to be present to the final version of the site upon release.

Thank you for your patience,
OpenAire Dev Team.

Close This Message

CREATE AN ACCOUNT

Name:
Username:
Password:
Verify Password:
E-mail:
Verify E-mail:
*All Fields Are Required.
Please Verify You Are Human:
fbtwitterlinkedinvimeoflicker grey 14rssslideshare1
Publisher: Springer Verlag
Languages: English
Types: Article
Subjects:
In most manufacturing systems the contribution of human labour remains a vital element that affects overall performance and output. Workers’ individual performance is known to be a product of personal attitudes towards work. However, in current system design processes, worker performance variability is assumed to be largely insignificant and the potential impact of worker attitudes is ignored. This paper describes a field study that investigated the extent to which workers’ production task cycle times vary and the degree to which such variations are associated with attitude differences. Results show that worker performance varies significantly, much more than is assumed by contemporary manufacturing system designers and that this appears to be due to production task characteristics. The findings of this research and their implications are discussed.
  • The results below are discovered through our pilot algorithms. Let us know how we are doing!

    • Mital, A., Pennathur, A., Huston, R.L., Thompson, D., Pittman, M., Markle, G., Kaber, D.B., Crumpton, L., Bishu, R.R., Rajurkar, K.P., Rajan, V., Fernandez, J.E., McMulkin, M., Deivanayagam, S., Ray, P.S. & Sule, D. (1999). The need for worker training in advanced manufacturing technology (AMT) environments: a white paper. International Journal of Industrial Ergonomics, 24, 173-184
    • Mollaghasemi, M., LeCroy, K. & Georgiopoulos, M. (1998). Application of neural networks and simulation modelling in manufacturing system design. Interfaces, 28, 5, 100-114
    • Mortimer, J. (Ed.). (1985). Integrated Manufacture. Berlin: Springer-Verlag Nemetz, P.L. & Fry, L.W. (1988). Flexible manufacturing organizations: implications for strategy formulation and organizational design. Academy of Management Review, 13, 4 627-638
    • Oliver, A., Cheyne, A., Tomas, J.M. & Cox, S. (2002). The effects of organizational and individual factors on occupational accidents. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 75, 473-488
    • Pacquet, V. & Lin, L. (2003). An integrated methodology for manufacturing systems design using manual and computer simulation. Human Factors and Ergonomics in Manufacturing, 13, 1, 19-40
    • Stone, D.L. & Eddy, E.R. (1996). A model of individual and organizational factors affecting quality-related outcomes. Journal of Quality Management, 1, 1, 21-48 Taylor, F.W. (1911). The Principles of Scientific Management. New York: Harper Tepas, D.I. (1994). Technological innovation and the management of alertness and fatigue in the workplace. Human Performance, 7, 3, 165-180
    • Viswesvaran, C. & Ones, D.S. (2000). Perspectives on models of job performance. International Journal of Selection and Assessment, 8, 4, 216-26
    • Womack, J.P., Jones, D.T. & Roos, D. (1990). 'The Machine that Changed the World'. New York: Macmillan Publishing
    • Youndt, M.A., Snell, S.A., Dean, J.W. & Lepak, D.P. (1996). Human resource management, manufacturing strategy, and firm performance. Academy of Management Journal, 39, 4, 836-855
    • Zammuto, R.F. & O'Connor, E.J. (1992). Gaining advanced manufacturing technologies' benefits: the roles of organizational design and culture. Academy of Management Review, 17, 701-728
  • No related research data.
  • No similar publications.

Share - Bookmark

Cite this article